
Originally Posted by
C-Dot
Supergirl said "Don't take this the wrong way, but I've found a place where I can make a difference. Where I'm more than Superman's kid cousin" as she's more than just associated with Superman. Supergirl is the same character from “Superman The Animated Series” just like Superman: Kara In-ze from planet Argo and not an El.
It's a message board. You can object, agree, comment, whatever on something or what someone says. No one said anything to you, but you sid something in response to something said to me. I can’t do the same with what you said? I’m not posting in all caps or “!!!!!!!” or raging. I disagreed and I’m very calm.
Anyone can like or dislike anything. But to make a generalization on what’s “more accessible” and paint a pic with no basis is a whole other thing. You and a few paint the pic of “what was originally done is dense and hard to comprehend” when it wasn’t and that one has a stronger tie to Superman than the other when that’s not true. Not based on opinion but on the fact that the character gained a lot of popularity from the story. And as far as Johns Superboy being “simplistic”, you have a hybrid “clone” of two people with a constantly revised origin versus a clone of just one with straightforward story. And now we have a clone with three people in the mix versus a clone of two people versus a clone of one.
Karl Kesel: "A few weeks after I took the assignment, there was a Superman summit where we figured out how to bring him back from the dead. I thought it would be nice if each of the Supermen somehow reflected the titles of their books. I remembered that the tagline from the old Superboy comic was ‘the adventures of Superman when he was a boy' and I thought Superboy should be the character in Adventures. I thought no one would go for it, but at the summit, we had a huge list of all the possible ways Superman could come back and Superboy was one of them. I really stomped to get it. I'm really happy that penciller Tom Grummett and I ended up with this Superman because he's a really fun character."
They could have made him a straight up clone but didn't. Number one, and the one a few seem to forget, is because it would defeat the purpose of the "Reign of the Supermen" story as none of the Supermen were Superman resurrected. He was presented as a "clone of Superman" to lay claim to being Superman resurrected, not to actually be a clone. That was his "angle". If he actually was a clone of Superman as he advertised, there would be no question as to who the true resurrected Superman was out of the four. That is why it was pointed out in the book that it was a misconception that he was Superman's clone. Every other Superman had the misconception that they were Superman brought back with their own supporters, but had more to their individual stories. Being hung up on "he's a clone of Superman" is just ignoring what was actually going on and done in the book.
Bookmarks