Clark Kent is Superboy!
Pre Crisis Superboy (Clark Kent / Kal El)
Kesel's Superboy (Kon El)
Johns' Superboy (Conner Kent)
DCnu Superboy
I really liked Conner right before the New reboot. I felt he finally really understood what being a hero was all about and was taking the next step to becoming a Superman of his own. I find it sad that DC needed to change him pretty much back to square one with the Reboot.
Agree it just didn't work, he altered just about everything about the character (origin, costume, personality, name) from his first story (Teen Titans not the characters 1st story), did virtually the same to Bart.
It didn't make any sense for Kon to go by the Conner Kent alias with his friends, they knew him as Kon. It also protected Clark Kents identity, the old Kon wouldn't even discuss Clark Kent being Superman with Lois when he first found out because he didn't want to risk Clarks identity by assuming she knew.
I agree, during and after Adventure Comics Superboy IMO really felt like he had matured, and in a way that he wanted. And as much as I find Lobdell current Superboy series to be interesting, especially in terms of ideas, I had much more (positive) emotional response to Johns' and Lemire's Adventure and Superboy series/runs.
I liked the Kesel and company '90s Superboy. The one who was an altered clone of Paul Westfield. He had this whole Peter Pan meets Superman meets '70s Jack Kirby thing going. I liked his attitude, too. He was kind of cocky and a show-off and a little bit of a hothead, but there was still something that was really likable about him. Probably his joie de vive. He seemed to really enjoy being a superhero, to the point where he'd sort of have fun with the perks of it (posing for pictures, signing autographs, etc).
Maybe, but he just didn't seem all that fun to read about for me anymore.Originally Posted by Lexrules
Story By Story- Story Circle of the Capital Region.
My own Youtube account, stories and public library use tips.
The old pre Teen Titans Kon, seemed far more responsible if a little naive at times, he also was very sure of himself and what he wanted to be.
Last edited by Ice Wolf; 04-22-2012 at 06:58 PM.
I just would have preferred that progression had it been born naturally out of who Kon originally was. I definitely don't begrudge Johns for wanting to give Kon some internal conflict, but he basically turned him into an entirely different character to do it. To me what was appealing about Superboy in the 90s was how different he was from a young Clark Kent. He has the same heart and the same desire to do good, but at the same time had a natural whimsy and ego that Clark did not. When Johns introduced the Lex conflict, Conner basically turned into a Clark clone with a fear of villainy on the side.
The former is what I see Lobdell's Kon evolving into. Right out of the pod he was extremely confident in himself to the point of arrogance despite being new not only to his powers but his own very state of being, but with the kind of robotic personality and nature that comes with basically having programmed intelligence. Now he's developing a personality, one that includes plenty of snark, sarcasm, and humor while at the same time displaying he has a heart. If Clark and Kon had grown up together as brothers, I see Kon as the one getting Clark into trouble and being overall the "naughtier" of the two. That's how I like to see Kon written.
Last edited by Sacred Knight; 04-22-2012 at 08:16 PM.
I think Lobdells SB is gonna make both camps (kesel and johns) happy in the future,just give it time.
Dont mess with the "S"
By the middle 90's Westfield was a afterthought. I see why DC switch the DNA to Luthor because it is a character that will always be there and would always make Conner unsure about what is his true personality.
They were kinda caught between a rock and a hard place with Superboy. I don't think they saw him as a character that would be around as long as he has when he was created back in 92 so they had to switch tactics and origins in the way they did.
I actually have to say, that that's kind of what I liked about Superboy's situation. Superboy was cloned from an evil man, but it had become a non-issue. How often do we see that in superhero comic books? Usually, it's some big thing that sticks with a character forever. The whole "daddy issues" thing has been done with so many other characters. It was done with Orion. It was done with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. It was done with Shand Chi. It was done with the Son of Satan (and just try topping that one for "most evil dad"). It was done, most famously, with Luke Skywalker. They're doing it right now in the Young Justice cartoon with Artemis. That's one of the biggest problems I had with the revamp of Superboy in the pages of Teen Titans. I felt like he had been changed into a character I had already seen in a million other places.
My other big problem is who they chose to be the DNA donor. Okay, I know there are a lot of Luthor fans around here. I know he's supposed to be Superman's archenemy and an important character. However, I don't think I've ever really enjoyed any of the Luthor stories I've read. He's just not a fun villian to read about. Yet, DC seems to use him in everything Superman-related anyway. But then, I prefer my DC super-villians over-the-top and colorful. Luthor's just so low-key in everything except his exposure.
Story By Story- Story Circle of the Capital Region.
My own Youtube account, stories and public library use tips.
Bookmarks