One thing that ROH has done very well over their entire history is protect the fact that their entire roster is like 5'4". Claudio and Hero being the main exceptions, but whoever has been in control of ROH has made sure that if they're going to bring in someone who is way taller than their normal guys, you're not going to see them standing next to anyone other than the one or two guys they're fighting. Even when Abyss was a lot better than he is now, ROH only brought him in once or twice.
There's a way to make Morgan work in ROH, but it would be way easier to make him work in WWE.
They did use him in the insurance commercial, so I don't think you can say none.
it's a marketing strategy....revenue by association....kids/fans see performer carrying said belt, they want a replica...now considering how popular the spinner was, that same strategy is probably what kept the deal going for so long
if you remove the spinner, the fans will not see it as important and therefore NOT want a replica
Support your local roller derby league
http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/2557...-returns-to-tv
WWE sent out a breaking news text which revelaed Vince McMahon's return on-camera to WWE television.
The text says on next week's RAW, McMahon will be on the show to evaluate John Laurinaitis' job performance. The text also reminded fans that the episode will be three hours.
You really don't have to double post this stuff. Just saying, I would guess most of us read the other threads, so no need to over do it since it isn't huge news.
Though how is Vince going to evaluate Big Johnny's Job if he got kicked out of his job.... I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU WWE
Last edited by KiFF86; 06-04-2012 at 05:25 PM.
I AM FOREVER- Master Shake
I mean I liked Face-Off, but I didn't go to college either.
Threee month rule
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...ThreeMonthRule
"It isn't jumping the shark if you never come back down." Chuck
Again, Its the three month rule.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...ThreeMonthRule
In professional wrestling, anything that happened more than three months ago is no longer true canon.
Professional Wrestling's version of Negative Continuity and Retcon.
The unwritten rule states that any events that took place more than three months ago do not need to be considered canon. This creates interesting situations where two wrestlers who were recently at each other's throats are now the best of friends. It also provides a means for the writers to not have to explain radical changes in a character's gimmick (went from a millionaire playboy to a voodoo priest and back again? No problem!).
Note that this is different from the Seven Year Rule; after three months, the aftereffects of a storyline can be forgotten, but after seven years, the storyline itself can be recycled wholesale.
An example of the rule being lampshaded
Vince always cvomes back when ratings dip, hads done it for years.
Nothing's gonna happen without a warning
http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/...rmination.html
Following WWE's announcement Wednesday that Randy Orton had been suspended for 60 days for his second violation of the Talent Wellness Program, the SmackDown wrestler met with Chairman Vince McMahon, Executive Vice President of Talent and Live Events Paul Levesque and Executive Vice President of Television Production Kevin Dunn at the organization's headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut on Friday.
A WWE source described the meeting's atmosphere as "hostile;" it was determined that a further decision concerning Orton awaits. Furthermore, "several" officials are lobbying for his termination as a cost-cutting measure. They feel his lucrative ten-year contract—signed in January 2010—can no longer be justified if he is brought back in a mid-level role.
McMahon especially, is infuriated with Orton, who felt he had matured in recent years. The nine-time world champion's suspension reportedly stems from a positive drug test for the anabolic steroid Dianabol, which is banned by the United States Congress under its Controlled Substances Act. He also reportedly tested positive for marijuana, which is subject to a $2,500 fine.
Bookmarks