Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 203
  1. #16
    Elder Member DeadXMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Big O
    Posts
    21,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darknessatnoon View Post
    *spits on the floor*

    Seconded

    *Spits* and throws a shoe at Marvel.
    Cyclops ad portas

  2. #17
    Senior Member blanchett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,158

    Default

    I usually like alternate universe stories but I'm not really digging the idea of this. The characters aren't exactly thrilling me...but Pak is a good writer worth giving it a go. Relieved it's not Claremont. I gave X-Men Forever a go, I was even excited by the concept but was thoroughly disappointed. Here's what the cover should look like with the logo. It really seems like they should have thought about the pink and orange blending together....

    http://blanchett.t15.org
    please don't edit or use pieces of my micros

  3. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Dazzler got my attention but the alt realities lost it. Just not my cup of tea for an ongoing. I do remember reading some previous Exiles issues and liked the direction the took with it and the rotating cast but it's just not my thing for an ongoing. I hope this doesn't mean Dazzler is out of 616 continuity completely. I really hated when they did that with Psylocke when she was in Exiles.

  4. #19
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,365

    Default

    I don't get it why all the hate for this book. It's just a new Exiles book. What the hell is so bad about that.

  5. #20

    Default

    I'll give it a chance. Nice to see someone at the X-offices actually give a crap about Dazzler. I'm curious about that cover too... the woman on the left looks far more like Emma (or Emmelina from the recent storyline -- and presumably not the steampunk Emma Pak references in the article) than Dazzler. Not sure why their core 3 would be dazzler, howlett, and kid nightcrawler, and then they'd skip having dazzler on the cover at all.

  6. #21
    Junior Member DarKHard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    211

    Default

    I'm not surprise Marvel... i already have a feeling that alternate timeline story will go on to another book and xtreme cast will be different than the last one,but a badass cowboy is always a welcome than that comedian headmaster although that headmaster is pretty much fun book and give me a few chuckle i'll give this one a shot,so i'm guessing that "that kael the invoker" is one of the enemy,right?

  7. #22
    Elder Member DeadXMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Big O
    Posts
    21,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewulf View Post
    I don't get it why all the hate for this book. It's just a new Exiles book. What the hell is so bad about that.
    Because the real X-treme was abouclandestinene group of x-men that did not trust the rest of the team and set out to complete the dyseny diaries in order to understand and prevent the future she envisioned all the same while setting the ground work for X.S.E.

    Mean while the original Exiles was equal parts of all that was good with Quantum leap, Sliders, and what if.
    Cyclops ad portas

  8. #23
    Senior Member rasx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    Why didn't they just call this book Team Exiles? And where's Blink?
    X-treme X-men without Storm and Sage is gonna be hard to digest.
    Favorites: Fearless Defenders* New Avengers* Bloodshot* Shadowman* Archer & Armstrong

  9. #24
    Elder Member DeadXMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Big O
    Posts
    21,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rasx View Post
    Why didn't they just call this book Team Exiles? And where's Blink?
    X-treme X-men without Storm and Sage is gonna be hard to digest.

    probaly because Exiles last revamped BOOOOOOMB soooooo bad.
    Cyclops ad portas

  10. #25
    crocheted evil Timberoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Syracuse, NY USA
    Posts
    738

    Default

    If Dazzler's in it, I'm in.

  11. #26
    MXAAGVNIEETRO were right The Black Guardian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    13,522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewulf View Post
    I don't get it why all the hate for this book. It's just a new Exiles book. What the hell is so bad about that.
    That it tries to be a new Exiles book.

    If Marvel wants to revisit Exiles, use Exiles and the characters that made it great. Otherwise: Do. Not. Bother.
    Last edited by The Black Guardian; 03-18-2012 at 11:50 AM.
    COEXIST | NOEXIST

    ShadowcatMagikДаякѕтая Sto☈mDustMercury MonetRachelCipher
    MagnetoNightcrawlerColossusRockslideBeastXavier

  12. #27
    Veteran Member airdreams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    5,157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by santino27 View Post
    I'll give it a chance. Nice to see someone at the X-offices actually give a crap about Dazzler. I'm curious about that cover too... the woman on the left looks far more like Emma (or Emmelina from the recent storyline -- and presumably not the steampunk Emma Pak references in the article) than Dazzler. Not sure why their core 3 would be dazzler, howlett, and kid nightcrawler, and then they'd skip having dazzler on the cover at all.

    i’m a little confused, too. according to the article, the team’s core characters are dazzler, governor general howlett and kid nightcrawler, emma is more like a relatively minor role only appearing in one or two arc. but the lady on the left of the cover definitely is her.

    and clearly she is not the steampunk emma frost from warren ellis's story (unless he means her inverted image).
    In dog days, all we need is Frost.

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    A 'brand new cast' that features two of the most over - used characters from the Marvel Universe. Nightcrawler reincarnated as Wolverine's 'son'. And here's bloody Armor again - a second rate Jubilee that for some perverse reason every X writer adores.

    Is this for real?

  14. #29

    Default

    I'd give it a go if it has Dazzler in it. It is essentially an Exiles book, but if it is even a fraction as good as that title I'll be happy. I would like to perhaps have a book without a Wolverine, but I understand Marvel needs to shift the book. But hey this is X-Treme X-Men so I assume the team will fluctuate.

  15. #30
    PINK WIG, THICK ASS. ZeoVGM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,755

    Default

    lol. I'm loving all the completely baseless hate in this thread.

    We get pissed when Marvel recycles ideas and then we get pissed then they try to do something a little different.

    Amazing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •