He sure did. It's interesting that most of the negative criticism directed at this series has to do with Vaughan's blithe refusal to uphold the propriety of any genre that he dips into. I don't think that the pattern necessarily disqualifies the criticism, since Saga's numerous shifts in tone and genre make for a prickly reading experience that disrupts the usual pleasures of watching a fictional world take shape. Still, other than Ellis, the harshest critics seem to have the best handle on what is distinctive about this first issue: it's peculiar mixture of elements. The closest parallel is probably the "New Weird" of novelists like China Mieville, based on potentially improper fictional worlds.
I liked the issue, but its pleasures have more to do with literary quirk than the creation of an immersive self-consistent mythology.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks