It's like saying that Jesse Custer from Preacher is a super-hero, since he has a costume (the collar), and powers (The Word).
It's like saying that Jesse Custer from Preacher is a super-hero, since he has a costume (the collar), and powers (The Word).
And it still doesn't make it a superhero comic. It used tropes and Gaiman was happy to use mainstream DC characters but it wasn't a superhero comic by any stretch of the imagination.
No, but you're missing the point.
Again, you miss the point, not to mention the signal sacking Karen Berger sent out to creators.
Oh bollocks to you.
You think Sandman is a superhero comic then fine, but that also makes you a large pink elephant typing with their tail. It's what I think so it must be true!!
I think I remember the case for Jon Sable; the early stories had the character wear a mask/makeup after all. But, that was just a hook, the book was so far away from super-heroes in terms of content.
I guess I could see Flagg! in the bright, primary colors of the Plexus Ranger uniform, but again, once you read an issue, you realize it's a book that doesn't have an easy classification. It's satire, it's futurist fiction, it's an examination of society now and then....it was a great book, (the first 12 issues were just perfect.)
That was Grell's point exactly; the mask was a hook, and once he'd hooked people in he quickly got shot of it.
The first 12 issues are among the best comics of any genre, they're superb but sadly unknown to a generation of fans, but yes, there were arguments about Flagg being some sort of superhero however Chaykin made it clear this wasn't the case but First were quite happy to blur the lines and let superhero fans pick up the comic. There was a similar argument over Nexus as well though that uses some obvious tropes, it became clear it really wasn't a superhero title at all.
Bookmarks