For his last full column of 2012, Marvel Editor-in-Chief Axel Alonso looks back at the biggest challenges of his first year on the job and looks forward to how "Avengers Vs. X-Men" will change the whole Marvel line.
Full article here.
For his last full column of 2012, Marvel Editor-in-Chief Axel Alonso looks back at the biggest challenges of his first year on the job and looks forward to how "Avengers Vs. X-Men" will change the whole Marvel line.
Full article here.
Whilst i'm a big fan of Gambit, i don't think it would be a good idea to give him a solo, especially nowadays. Just a better role in an Xbooks, which he seems to be getting now in Legacy and Astonishing.
Check out the O.A.W. Report at www.majinoaw.blogspot.com. You want to see why I say the things I do or understand what's in my head... this is the place to go.
It seems weird that Kieron Gillen isn't involved in this event - I wish Marvel would dump this daft 'architects' promotion.
Comic bletherings by me at: http://dangermart.blogspot.com/
Did I see Pietro in those X Factor preview pages? That's interesting
We must have waffles. We must all have waffles forthwith![]()
For "some reason?" The reason is right there in the name you've chosen for them, Stranded Limited Series, as they're pretty much stranded without any support or marketing push to make them 'essential reading' in the environment Marvel, not the reader, has created, where only certain books 'count.'Originally Posted by Alonso
Plus, flooding the market last year with all the confusing Thor and Cap miniseries certainly didn't help matters.
This is a great sentiment, as an editor, and EIC, _he_ is the one that can change the market, and bring it closer to an ideal world where it's not mostly about books that 'count.' But instead, his side of the column is all about the big event, and not one mention of an upcoming book that's great, but less relevant.Originally Posted by Alonso
Thank you Kiel Phegley for asking about pricing and double shipping concerns of budget minded fans, even if I'm disappointed in the answer. And a big thank you, and to Axel Alonso also, for taking the time to do these columns each week. They often make my head explode, but I appreciate you both taking the time to do them and interacting with the fans.
Last edited by Rheged; 12-16-2011 at 03:23 PM.
Nice Preview Art for the X-men.
Isn't "Whilst" used for a period of time, not meant to replace "while" in the contrastive sense? Just something I remember reading.
As for the topic, I do agree with this. Lower tiered characters are having a tougher time attracting an audience and, as much as I love the character, I know the series wouldn't last.
On the other hand, at least I'd get a few more issues to add to my collections, so I say no harm in trying!
Now that is what i like to hear a Man who love the industry and not the brand.
Wow someone at Marvel who actually understands the true risks of double shipping and doesn't just insult those questioning it. Axel admits that double shipping may well cause readers to drop other books they are reading (something I've said many times here and been put down by Wacker for). Axel is gambling that that Marvel's net readership stays the same.
It is a concern. Of course, part of the risk is ours: We realize that someone who is buying four extra issues of "Deadpool" in a calendar year might, as a result, pass over a 4-issue limited series that we publish. But keep in mind, those four issues probably replaced a Deadpool limited series or something similar.
Price your book at $3.99 and I'll trade wait. Make me wait too long for the trade PAPERback and I'll say screw it. I'm looking at you Marvel and Spider Island.
My biggest problem with the double-shippings is that it increases the amount of artists for a title and they almost never have similar styles. That really bugs me.
I also think that they make it harder for smaller titles to succeed. If someone needs to trim down its pull-list because of the double-shippings, it's very likely that the "less important" titles will get dropped.
Top 3: Batman, Wonder Woman, X-force
I actually think a solid Gambit ongoing could do very well. Gambit has a very very big core group of fans. In my opinion, I'd bet it would sit right around MoonKnight status. And if they wrote it well, could do even better. Further, given his lack of attention in X-Men, more people would pick it up than before since they can't find him in 5 other comics like before.
If there is no chance of an Ongoing, at least give this guy a role front and center (cough XML main character cough). I'm sorry, but I just don't think people want to read about Namor, Hope, Science Club, and some of the other characters we are getting too much of...
That is some nice art on UXM #4, and Luppacchino's work on X-Factor is as pretty as ever. Looks like ole Pietro has stopped by as well.
I like AA's statement that he'd rather read a great story that's out of continuity rather than one that draws from and builds upon it. Unfortunately, most of the market seems to be continuity junkies and I'm at a loss as to what can be done to remedy that.
Bookmarks