No offense taken.
and yeah but sometimes is just easier to erase 20 times a videocassette. LOL
and apparently I am not the only one.
BTW, many music artist are tying to bring back LP, I hear some are releasing both CD and LP. I cant remember who these are. I think Katy Perry is one of them.
I thought that Evan Bourne had suddenly beefed up. You wouldn't think it would make that much of a difference, but...
Totally.
Vinyl does sound better, if you've got good equipment and are doing nothing but listening to music. I listen to music all the time, but usually while I'm doing other things. Good quality MP3s are usually more than good enough, especially if you factor in things like road noise or other distractions, with the bonus of being super-portable. Plus, records cost a damned fortune. Anyways, "pretty good" works for me, mainly because I don't want to deal with the added expense and difficulty of getting that last 10% of quality.
[QUOTE=Alex;15079922]"SPIKE TV’S “IMPACT WRESTLING” MOVING TO 8:00PM ET/PT ON THURSDAYS BEGINNING MAY 31
what, sitcoms getting better ratins on other channels. 1st 1/2 hour they will lose viewers due to BBNGTHEORY which'll make 'em switch back....
it's not like Steve Austin's progression from semi-long to crew cut to bald. and Roode's not balding even- i had really long hair , but it was starting to thin so i just cut it and shaved my head.
i said it before, i'll say it again. videotapes- when they're stopped and pulled out they remain in the exact place [scene] you stopped them at. plus the whole rerecording thing. i love 'em. DVDS, however, will not always be at the very scene you stopped at if pulled out- plus no rerecording. inferior product!
i hate Kaz's hair. it just looks ... juvenile.
Vinyl and cassette tapes are/were great. Vinyl will always be louder than this new tech. Cassettes for cars were better for handling too.
[There's a place in my mind.The one part that isn't looking for a joke.When laughter breaks down, and humor can't quiet its hunger,the rage gets out]-Harley Quinn
Mr. Backlund continued wrestling under the new gimmick of an out of touch, yet highly dangerous, maniac out to teach the new generation a lesson.[3] He often appeared in business suits, had a hyperactive personality, and used (or, often, misused) large words to sound important. He also demanded that he be addressed as "Mr. Backlund". He would only sign autographs for wrestling fans if they could recite the names of all of the US Presidents in chronological order
Mr. Backlund continued wrestling under the new gimmick of an out of touch, yet highly dangerous, maniac out to teach the new generation a lesson.[3] He often appeared in business suits, had a hyperactive personality, and used (or, often, misused) large words to sound important. He also demanded that he be addressed as "Mr. Backlund". He would only sign autographs for wrestling fans if they could recite the names of all of the US Presidents in chronological order
I think the show doesn't have enough credibility or interest depth for my liking. I like Magnus, for example. (Though I probably prefer his RKK stuff to TNA's.) I'm cool with seeing him get a tag title run. But the tag division has been neglected over time. There just aren't many compelling teams. Aries is cool but the X-Division is all but Double A & his bitches. Similar story in the Knockouts division with Gail & Mickie (who unlike AA aren't even compelling characters.)
I do love Bully Ray. And I'm glad to see Storm and Roode get solo chances. Though I confess that their chemistry/enjoyment factor as a team has not been matched by anything I have seen from either so far.
Jeff Hardy still sucks, to me. And anything involving a Bischoff is pretty much guaranteed to be God Awful.
If they were finding their niche, I might more consider saying,"Alright, I just don't enjoy it." But most of the speak I've seen has not only their ratings & PPV buys tumbling, but now reports are their house shows are further struggling.
Honestly as it is presented, I don't think TNA has much appeal toward picking up new fans, certainly domestically speaking. And apparently is having an increasingly difficult time holding on to the ones it already possessed.
Last edited by The Great Grape; 05-01-2012 at 01:55 AM.
No eight tracks for me, but I too still use a vcr to tape things. The Sony VCR/DVD is close to a decade old and still hanging in, so I figure why not run with it. No sense spending in an area that doesn't really require it.
I haven't bought video tapes in many years. But I still have some from back far as the 80's. Virtually all still play quite well to perfectly. Their main practical disadvantage is their weight and the space they take up.
Same thing with me. I find the VCR tapes easier to record than the DVDs. With the VCR you just push the record button and it does it's thing. With a DVD recorder there are alot of steps one has to do. Also when you stop a tape on a VCR it remains right on the scene that you stopped it on when you play it again. They still have drawbacks but I find myself recording on VHS more than I do DVD's
"It isn't jumping the shark if you never come back down." Chuck
http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/tna/..._revealed.html
At today's Impact tapings, the word about the "new concept" that Hulk Hogan was been saying would "change the business" and be "momentum-shifting" is something where TNA will be calling on their fans to film TNA wrestlers whenever they may encounter them, in or out of the ring.
It almost sounds like a TMZ-style "paparazzi" thing, with people trying to film the every move of the TNA wrestlers.
Early reports are that the idea isn't going over very well with the TNA locker room, with one person pointing out that Hogan is perhaps the last person who should promote something like this with the way his own personal videos are coming back to haunt him these days.
Bookmarks