I think on the podcast he put over Cena/Lesnar as a match pretty well, aside from the finish, and he loved Daniel Bryan Sheamus, said it might have been Sheamus best match, and was one of Daniel Bryans best in WWE, said Jericho/Punk was 3rd best match, not because it was bad but because the other 2 were so good.
And i can't recall what he said about the other stuff, complaigning about big show stepping through the table as a finish.
Speaking of that though, it's important to remember Cena/Lesnar the match itself was very good. Kane/Orton was a fine brawl, Sheamus/Bryan was a very very good pro wrestling match, Punk/Jericho was a good brawling sort of match, that's 4 good matches on a card on a b ppv.
Im wondering if DB/Sheamus might get 5 stars.
I really dont have a problem with Lesner losing. I do have a problem with Cena being able to speak at all. This should have been more like Hunter/Taker 2, where the Taker is being carried out. Cena does not need to job at every big match. He has nearly every big match he has been for the last year. Lesner is not beloved. Lesnar can lose matches and still be dominant. The way to continue to make him special, is for him to be a guy, who does whatever he wants to whoever he wants.