Yeah, that's what I thought, but was too lazy to look it up to make sure. My basic point was that I'm at a something of a loss to explain the superhero trappings present in V, since they seem completely unnecessary to the story.
The mask and cape didn't bother me that much - you could make a case for that with the concept of the Guy Fawkes imagery as symbolic rebel - and the emotionless anonymity of the mask made for a pretty memorable visual effect. It was the superpowers V supposedly had that felt out of place to me. Like Dan, I forgot all about them until I re-read it a few years back instead of seeing the movie, upon which my reaction was, "Oh yeah, forgot about that bit. Never did understand why Moore wrote that in."The Guy Fawkes mask didn't originate with V. And Gibbons has claimed that the use of the mask, cape and hat were his suggestions.
It's hardly a secret that something is badly wrong with me. - dan bailey
I am ... a condescending prick sometimes. But I usually mean to be. - Paradox
I'm not infallible. I just act like it. - Me
(not wanting to speak for dan, but just offering my own take on it...)
Straightforward and comprehensible, yes...but just not the real Marvel Universe.![]()
The whole Ultimates line is like one giant "What If..." as far as I'm concerned. I'm only interested in the proper 616 Marvel Universe, as created by Lee, Kirby, Ditko etc, way back in the early '60s. Except no substitutes!
![]()
MY PULL LIST
All-Star Western • Avenging Spider-Man • Hit-Girl • Lady Mechanika • Road To Oz • Sherlock Holmes: The Liverpool Demon • Superior Spider-Man • Star Wars • Star Wars: Dark Times
Not far out super-powers like flying, but I'm pretty sure (without checking) that the hormone injections he was given at Larkhill gave V enhanced reflexes, somewhat greater strength, higher resistance to pain and increased mental abilities. I'm pretty sure that's also true of V in the movie.
MY PULL LIST
All-Star Western • Avenging Spider-Man • Hit-Girl • Lady Mechanika • Road To Oz • Sherlock Holmes: The Liverpool Demon • Superior Spider-Man • Star Wars • Star Wars: Dark Times
I tend to split superhero comics fans into "People who like Krypto" and "People who don't like Krypto."
Basically, if you miss the wonder of a dog flying around in a little Superman cape, you're in the wrong hobby.
-- Reptisaurus!
Actually, I don't want to see Avengers because of Marvel/Disney's callous disregard for the creators who made such cash cows possible. It wouldn't matter if every member of the cast was as white as the attendance for the ceremonial cross-burning after a Mitt Romney rally. There's also the little fact that I tend not to much like superhero movies, for whatever reasons.
And, as it happens, the Nick Fury that the aforementioned creators came up with happens to be white. If that offends you, it's something you'll have to take up with Stan Lee &, if you've got access to a good Ouija board, Jack Kirby.
Similarly, a few years after that they created a character called the Black Panther. He happens to be black, as I suppose the name implies (though the Black Cat isn't black, so I guess that's not exactly guaranteed). I'd find it equally absurd for him to be portrayed by, I dunno, Johnny Depp, which I'm sure also makes me an unregenerate racist.
I tend to split superhero comics fans into "People who like Krypto" and "People who don't like Krypto."
Basically, if you miss the wonder of a dog flying around in a little Superman cape, you're in the wrong hobby.
-- Reptisaurus!
I didn't even like it when they cast a blonde guy as James Bond. The actor won me over once I saw Casino Royale, but I still think they should dye his hair black. It's just the way James Bond is supposed to look. Granted, the physique of all the Bond actors has been a lot beefier than he's described in the books, but that's harder to change.
But for me it's the overall impression that's more important than just the visual alone. For example, when Idris Elba was cast as Heimdall in the Thor movie, my main worry was that he'd sound like an American guy from the 'hood. As it turned out, he delivered one of the best performances in the movie, though in a smallish role. In fact - and everybody might laugh at this - I seriously think they should have cast him as Thor. If Olivier can play Othello, I sure they could have figured something out so that the visual wasn't too far removed from the long-haired blonde guy we all know from the comics.
Daniel Craig, just remembered his name.
With Samuel Jackson, I think the main problem is that he's gotten to the point where he's just playing Samuel Jackson in everything, so that's a distraction from the character. It's as much to do with the way he talks as the appearance. To me it's like if you cast 50-Cent as the Thing: underneath all that orange, he's not going to sound the way I think Ben Grimm is supposed to sound.
I think the fact that, while I have read little outside of Ultimate Spiderman, I find the series different in a positive way in comparison to 616 Spiderman, I'll be incurring the wrath of many here. 8-) Not better just different, and that different appeals to me more than 616. Outside of that I haven't read much Ultimates other than some issues of FF for Thanos appearances.
"To alcohol, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems." -- Homer Simpson
"The Christian resolve to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
i saw Avengers, it was really good for what it was. although the movie snob in me disagrees! But altogether this is how a superhero movie should be done, though i do feel theyve got some pretty weak actors in the main roles. Captain America looks laughable.
no doubt its like the new Star Wars for little kids, so cant hurt Marvels long term entertainment-peddling ambitions.
Last edited by CromagnonMan; 05-09-2012 at 05:35 AM.
Bookmarks