I mean, how could you explain to a kid that their most favorite Superhero, made a deal with the devil to save a life ?
Especially if that kid's Christian.![]()
I mean, how could you explain to a kid that their most favorite Superhero, made a deal with the devil to save a life ?
Especially if that kid's Christian.![]()
No offence, but this is sort of a silly topic for a thread.
First off, why would you need to?
What I mean is, we are talking about a character whose long history has already involved such "un-Christian" and questionable (for children) topics such as: pre-marital sex, his best friend's drug overdoses, indirectly causing his lover's death, thousands of violent fights, being killed after having eyeball eaten by Morlun, etc.
I mean.....why pick on this one story when there is a long history of other like I just listed??![]()
"What oldschool said"
The Shadow, 2008
Just say the kid asked?
"Hey Dad, isn't that red guy with the horns the bad guys?".![]()
"You can't trust them as poets either. The true poet is anonymous, as to his habits, but these boys have to look, act, and apparently smell like poets"
Flannery O'Connor on the beats.
I would only allow my kid to read spidey comics up until OMD/BND stuff, honestly, so i would not have to explain anything.
"Superior New Day" is temporary: but maybe Juggernaut can be the new She-Hulk! And Skeletor can be Battle Cat. Darth Vader can be Princess Leia in the new Superior Star Wars! Unleash the Whacken!
I'm wondering what the odds are that it's going to matter.
If a kid picks up a story in which Peter and MJ were married, and then reads a more recent story, will any explanation other than "They broke up?" really be necessary to explain what happened between those two stories?
Why would someone be talking about OMD with a child?
I mean jeez, make some friends your own age.
I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
-Theophilus
If they are truly repentant, then I take no issue. Though if that is not the case I don't particularly like it. I mean remember just following orders doesn't get you off the hook.
That is just a side effect of different writers. Though I will say if you have no issue with him working with outright murders then you have no real right to be upset about OMD.
That is kind of the problem with superhero comics in general, they are more about idealism. They are more than willing to let people die as long as they don't have to "sink to their level". Though this is a different argument for a different time.
Yeah this is one of the more out there topics.
Maybe, but I still like the idea of using sock puppets to soften the blow.
Last edited by charlesthehammer; 05-28-2012 at 10:41 PM.
Honestly, if we're talking his "suitability for kids," I'd argue that the mainstream continuity Spider-Man was never written for young kids, but for teens and up. I can't even imagine young children reading the Stan Lee era of Spidey and fully understanding it, so I'm going to have to agree with this last string of posts and ask why you would ever need to explain it to a young kid. Give them Marvel Adventures (or whatever the kid line is now, if it still exists) and tell them to go read that, if you really have nothing better to do than talk about Spider-Man with children.
I had a letter printed once in Amazing Spider-Man #604!
Before Marvel NOW!, my pull list was 14 Marvel books. Now, it's more like 5 Marvel, 7 DC, and a few indies.
Twitter: @RRiddell3
Bookmarks