Page 2 of 29 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 433
  1. #16
    Arkadeian prince aegisbearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,813

    Default

    Andy is the Olympian! :)
    Last edited by aegisbearer; 12-27-2009 at 04:26 AM.
    Keep faith. Trust to love. Fight with honor. But, fight to win. - Gail Simone, Wonder Woman
    _________________________________________

    Author, Task Force: Gaea (Available on Amazon.com)

  2. #17
    BANNED jameslm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Yup! Sure is!

  3. #18
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyMangels View Post
    There are problems collecting most of the missing data.

    1984-1988 are years I haven't snagged the SOOs for YET; after that, DC stopped filing them. I'll be getting them, just have not.

    1984-2006 is also when the rise of the Direct Market had a major effect. There were two MAJOR direct distributors (Diamond and Capital), numerous smaller ones (Heroes World, Second Genesis, and others), AND there was still a newsstand market. So collating sales figures WITHOUT any SOOs is going to be next to impossible. I have sales charts for several of the distributors, so I can show ranking, but that's a long and laborious process and involves getting a lot of boxes out of storage.

    The interesting thing with the SOOs is that the correlation between print run and actual sales was ABSURD. DC was often printing up to three times the amount of actual copies sold. If WW was selling 50,000 copies (including subscriptions), DC might print and ship to newsstands 150,000, of which 100,000 copies would be destroyed!

    Once the Direct Market nearly completely took the place of the newsstand market, sales narrowed down more than they ever had, cutting off all but the "fans" who would go to comic book stores; casual buyers who would pick up the title on newsstands thus disappeared, as did their sales.

    Then too, one must look at the cultural world around comics, and how outer entertainment factors have affected comics as a whole.
    * The rise of television in the 1950s-1960s dealt a major blow to the comics field, probably much moreso than anything Wertham and Kefauver ever did.
    * The rise of video games -- and video tapes -- in the 1980s struck the second major blow.
    * The rise of the internet in the 1990s struck almost a killing blow.
    * These latter two, combined with the rise of the Direct Market supremacy and the strangling to death of newsstand sales, meant that by the 1990s, comics were selling only a fraction of what they once had.
    * Add in today's high prices vs. the recession, and it's lucky comic fans have any market to visit.

    As to your assertion about the Loebs run, that period will be one of the hardest to graph, as it is post-SOO and smack in the middle of the multiple-distributors newsstand-dying era. But I actually believe, from the evidence I've read, that Byrne's run (which as one can see, was well into the 40K range) was the highest the book had been since the early days of Perez's run. I think the Loebs run started small in sales, and experienced a spike during the Deodato era, but not equal (or possibly barely equal) to Byrne's sales.

    So, it's really post-Byrne that the sales -- and fans -- were lost.
    Thanks for your response; but, didn't Loebs get the cheesecake reputation when Deodato came aboard? Actually, I believe that Loebs equal and surpassed Byrne while Deodato was onboard. I was just offering a suggestion; I only want success for Wonder Woman and I'm glad you have a firm grasp on all of the causes; I only listed two of those factors, one you stated (e.g. the Internet) and one I stated (e.g. cheesecake; maybe just a risky speculation at this point).

  4. #19
    Wonder Woman Museum AndyMangels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhiannon View Post
    Remember that many people download their comics these days. Yes, it's illegal and annoying but there it is, there might be another 40,000 people downloading Wonder Woman comics.
    People also borrow and trade comics between friends so one copy doesn't mean one person. It might mean 2, 3 or even 10 people. I borrow a lot of comics off my ex, sometimes I'll buy my own and sometimes I'll just keep his and hope he forgets about them.
    Wonder Woman is still selling 30-60 thou and I think we should try to be more positive instead of complaining all the time about some weird arbitrary marker of success.
    I believe that you're significantly exaggerating the downloaded copies of Wonder Woman. In my experiences at conventions and online, the amount of downloaders is significantly smaller than what most people believe it to be. And while it's true that more people may be READING Wonder Woman in download form, the comic store employees I've discussed the matter with (and sales levels in general) show that since the rise of comics downloading (the last 5 years), the actual sales level has not dropped very significantly. Almost everyone I know who downloads Wonder Woman ALSO buys the physical comic.

    Statistically, the sales highs and lows have stayed very consistent in the low-20Ks to mid-40Ks for 13 charted years, rising and falling for new creative teams, or sales stunts.

    The "pass along rate" doesn't matter in the comic SALES question, as a passed-along comic does not affect SALES of the comic itself.

    Pass-along readers ARE better for the company than "average consumers," however, as they may be more likely to buy trade paperbacks, and are certainly more likely to buy more Wonder Woman merchandise. And merchandise is the main reason that Wonder Woman remains a marketable commodity for Warner.

    It's interesting to look at the trades and collection numbers, as they've stayed remarkably consistent, eroded only mostly by the HC/SC introduction. From them, we can see that the TRADE audience for Wonder Woman is likely in the 20K-29K range, plus or minus. Archives started out around 29K and by #5 are down to 15K. If one compares that to, let's say, high-end Tonner dolls where the edition size has shrunk from the over-a-thousand to 500, to 200 to 100, you start to get a picture where the hardcore demographic of Wonder Woman is versus the casual buyer.

    But a Wonder Woman t-shirt still likely has a higher print-run -- and likely higher sales -- than most issues of her comic book.

    As for your assertions that "Wonder Woman is still selling 30-60 thou" and labelling them "weird arbitrary marker of success," either you don't fully understand the numbers or you're being disingenious.
    * Wonder Woman has NOT sold 60K since Picoult came onboard.
    * Wonder Woman has not sold 50K since Gail's first issue.
    * The entire last year has run from 26K-32K, with the latest issue (#38) being the lowest sales level since #213, five years ago.
    * These are not just "weird arbitrary marker of success," these are Sales Figures. They're cold, hard, facts. Unfortunately, emphasis is on "cold."

    Do these spell doom for the Wonder Woman comic? No, no more than any other comic. Wonder Woman's sales ranking has stayed remarkably consistent. But the continued erosion of the comic book sales -- Wonder Woman included -- are undeniable.

    What can be done? A good movie would spike sales for at least a solid year. Iron Man has grown incredibly around the film. A television series wouldn't hurt. Other than that, not much.

  5. #20
    Wonder Woman Museum AndyMangels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dshipp17 View Post
    Thanks for your response; but, didn't Loebs get the cheesecake reputation when Deodato came aboard? Actually, I believe that Loebs equal and surpassed Byrne while Deodato was onboard. I was just offering a suggestion; I only want success for Wonder Woman and I'm glad you have a firm grasp on all of the causes; I only listed two of those factors, one you stated (e.g. the Internet) and one I stated (e.g. cheesecake; maybe just a risky speculation at this point).
    Wow, a whole bunch of responses while I was formulating and researching MY responses. Thanks for the kind words, pals 'n' gals!

    Deodato did bring the cheesecake quotient into high gear, but it was reflective of comics at the time (see: Jim Balent's Catwoman at DC and any number of "Bad Girl" independent comics). I'll see if I can get some thoughts from the editor of the book as to Loebs' general sales level, but I don't think it ever significantly topped Byrne's or Perez's. As I explained, reliable sales figures are nearly impossible to get from the period.

    And I want Wonder Woman to succeed as well. I'd love to see her atop the charts one day, with Gail writing, or any creative team who also respects her character and history rather than her bust size and thong song.

  6. #21
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyMangels View Post
    Wow, a whole bunch of responses while I was formulating and researching MY responses. Thanks for the kind words, pals 'n' gals!

    Deodato did bring the cheesecake quotient into high gear, but it was reflective of comics at the time (see: Jim Balent's Catwoman at DC and any number of "Bad Girl" independent comics). I'll see if I can get some thoughts from the editor of the book as to Loebs' general sales level, but I don't think it ever significantly topped Byrne's or Perez's. As I explained, reliable sales figures are nearly impossible to get from the period.

    And I want Wonder Woman to succeed as well. I'd love to see her atop the charts one day, with Gail writing, or any creative team who also respects her character and history rather than her bust size and thong song.
    Oh, they'd respect the character; it's just fun to have the cheesecake, also. I don't think that just narrows things down to her bust size and thong song; those are just two other enjoyable features of Wonder Woman.

  7. #22
    Veteran Member SJNeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyMangels View Post

    So, it's really post-Byrne that the sales -- and fans -- were lost.
    Not surprising considering his art and stories... left a lot to be desired. To put it nicely.

    In my very humble opinion, of course.

  8. #23
    Senior Member lariatofhestia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,264

    Default

    Thank you so much for your hard work and I am afraid sales do mean something contrary to what some people like to think.

    It has to influence whether DC is willing to risk a second title and that might not be if the only one can't even plateau and maintain something respectable between 30 and 40 k. It is just losing too many readers. And this was a relaunched title...not one that has just been going on for years!!!

    It shows that there is an audience as seen by the sales upon the relaunch but as the story progressed people have been gradually losing interest.


    If one is a DC boss then one has to pay attention to the reasons why the current series is not really gelling. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure that out. It's as simple as that if one wants Diana to succeed.

    Anyway thanks for that.

  9. #24
    Member marvelboy74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA
    Posts
    650

    Default

    Really depressing when you look at the recent sales numbers. It's a shame because Gail's run has had better stories and moments than most of Byrne's run and she didn't have to do retcons. I'm skeptical to believe the Heinberg's name was the sole reason WW sales jumped but it appears so, which is a shame because it was such a let down.

  10. #25

    Default

    Thanks for the hard data, Andy!

    And yeah, the sales numbers don't spell doom. Bear in mind that there are a few points in Wondy's history where the sales numbers are close to the current level and they didn't spell doom there, either.
    Lightbringer - The World's First Superhero

    Long Live the Revolution! Revolution of the Mask - Issue 2 Now Available!

    Let's set bad comics on fire from Atop the Fourth Wall

  11. #26
    Mew Nember Atomcrush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marvelboy74 View Post
    Really depressing when you look at the recent sales numbers. It's a shame because Gail's run has had better stories and moments than most of Byrne's run and she didn't have to do retcons. I'm skeptical to believe the Heinberg's name was the sole reason WW sales jumped but it appears so, which is a shame because it was such a let down.
    Heinbeg also benefitted from the soft reboot and renumbering.
    "We are not what we did, but what we will do" --- Jann Arden

  12. #27
    Mew Nember Atomcrush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    Yes Andy, thanks a bunch. You seem like an exceptionally busy fellow, with several irons in the fire, so it is much appreciated that you took the time to share this information with us.
    "We are not what we did, but what we will do" --- Jann Arden

  13. #28
    His Name Is The Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,060

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SJNeal View Post
    Not surprising considering his art and stories... left a lot to be desired. To put it nicely.

    In my very humble opinion, of course.
    I don't think you understood what he meant. Byrne sold well. But sales started falling after Byrne left and we got the interim period of Priest doing a few fill-ins and then the short Erik Luke run. Byrne, love him or hate him is a big name creator and DC didn't have anyone of similar quality ready to take over the series. Luke was critically acclaimed for his work at Dark Horse but didn't have the name recognition that a Byrne or Perez would. Sales dropped because there wasn't an immediate changeover to a permanent creative team, and said eventual creative team just wasn't as big a draw.

    I do wonder what would have happened had Byrne stuck to his original plan and kept on the book longer, since he left the book early when he was told that Kupperberg was leaving and wanted to bow out with him. Since Kupperberg ended up staying longer, Byrne ended up leaving prematurely. In a world where Byrne's run lasted another year, who knows what would have happened? With more advance notice, who could DC have gotten to take over the title? Jurgens?

  14. #29
    Wonder Woman Museum AndyMangels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Found one more SOO for Series 2, but since DC stopped running them in 1988, this is all there was. Still, it shows that the Perez run was a HUGE jump forward in sales from the previous series.

    1987 Wonder Woman #15 SOO 118,550

    Also, thanks to the Standard Catalog of Comic Books (2nd Edition), I found some Capital City orders of almost all of the Series 2 issues. These are ONLY one distributors' orders, and did not factor in orders from Diamond, Heroes World, Second Genesis, or others, nor newsstand sales. My bet is that these were probably around 1/4 of total sales.

    The CC orders do, however show trends in sales. I've marked a few spots where artist changes were made. Surprisingly, while sales declined after Perez left the book, it was not immediate, and Perez sales were often less than 1/3 of when he had started. The Deodato sales didn't immediately pick up, but were rising already before "The Contest" issues, and peaked as those showed up. And Byrne's sales started strong.

    I tried to add these CC orders into posting #2 below, but was unable to due to too much material, so it's in this post. You can now see SOME figures for all but thirteen issues. It isn't likely that Diamond will ever release their numbers prior to 1996, and the other distributors are out of business, so this is most likely the closest look we'll ever actually get at sales.

    Still, I'll eventually do a lot of digging in storage to pull out old Capital City Internal Correspondances and catalogues, as well as Diamond and Heroes World catalogues, to see if I can find more sales figure. Don't expect that to happen anytime too soon though!

    ++++++++++

    The following are order numbers from Capital City Distributors ONLY, and are not reflective of total sales. They likely reflect about 1/4 of total sales, when factoring in other distributors, newsstand sales, and subscriptions.

    NEW as of Nov 30, 2010: Thanks to new numbers being posted at TheComicChron, I've been able to update some of the numbers below with Diamond (blue); Diamond numbers mean one point equals about 700-800 copies sold:

    October 1995 Wonder Woman #102 $1.95 (CCo) 20,650
    October 1995 Wonder Woman #102 $1.95 (Diamond rank 35) 71.96
    September 1995 Wonder Woman #101 $1.95 (CCo) 29,800 Byrne
    September 1995 Wonder Woman #101 $1.95 (Diamond rank 20) 89.36
    August 1995 Wonder Woman Annual #04 $3.50 (Diamond rank 94) 39.92
    July 1995 Wonder Woman #100 $2.95 (CCo) 28,825
    July 1995 Wonder Woman #100 Collectors Ed $3.95 (Diamond rank 40) 79.23
    July 1995 Wonder Woman #100 Newsstand Ed $2.95 (Diamond rank 230) 16.33
    July 1995 Wonder Woman #099 $1.75 (CCo) 20,200
    July 1995 Wonder Woman #098 $1.50 (Diamond rank 65) 57.50
    June 1995 Wonder Woman #098 $1.75 (CCo) 16,100
    June 1995 Wonder Woman #098 $1.50 (Diamond rank 72) 40.0
    May 1995 Wonder Woman #097 $1.50 (CCo) 16,200
    May 1995 Wonder Woman #097 $1.50 (Diamond rank 75) 39.0
    April 1995 Wonder Woman #096 $1.50 (CCo) 15,400
    April 1995 Wonder Woman #096 $1.50 (Diamond rank 85) 25.6
    March 1995 Wonder Woman #095 $1.50 (CCo) 14,175
    March 1995 Wonder Woman #095 $1.50 (Diamond rank 109) 33.7
    February 1995 Wonder Woman #094 $1.50 (CCo) 12,900
    January 1995 Wonder Woman #093 $1.50 (CCo) 12,850

    ++++++++++

    December 1994 Wonder Woman #092 $1.50 (CCo) 11,100
    November 1994 Wonder Woman #091 $1.50 (CCo) 9,500
    October 1994 Wonder Woman #000 $1.50 (CCo) 16,400
    September 1994 Wonder Woman #090 $1.50 (CCo) 8,750
    August 1994 Wonder Woman #089 $1.50 (CCo) 7,600
    July 1994 Wonder Woman #088 $1.50 (CCo) 8,050
    June 1994 Wonder Woman #087 $1.50 (CCo) 7,500
    May 1994 Wonder Woman #086 $1.50 (CCo) 7,600
    April 1994 Wonder Woman #085 $1.50 (CCo) 7,400 Deodato
    March 1994 Wonder Woman #084 $1.50 (CCo) 7,800
    February 1994 Wonder Woman #083 $1.50 (CCo) 8,100
    January 1994 Wonder Woman #082 $1.25 (CCo) 8,375

    ++++++++++

    December 1993 Wonder Woman #081 $1.25 (CCo) 8,600
    November 1993 Wonder Woman #080 $1.25 (CCo) 8,550
    October 1993 Wonder Woman #079 $1.25 (CCo) 8,650
    September 1993 Wonder Woman #078 $1.25 (CCo) 8,900
    August 1993 Wonder Woman #077 $1.25 (CCo) 9,600
    July 1993 Wonder Woman #076 $1.25 (CCo) 9,700
    June 1993 Wonder Woman #075 $1.25 (CCo) 10,350
    May 1993 Wonder Woman #074 $1.25 (CCo) 9,450
    April 1993 Wonder Woman #073 $1.25 (CCo) 9,650
    March 1993 Wonder Woman #072 $1.25 (CCo) 9,400
    February 1993 Wonder Woman #071 $1.25 (CCo) 9,350
    January 1993 Wonder Woman #070 $1.25 (CCo) 9,100

    ++++++++++

    December 1992 Wonder Woman #069 $1.25 (CCo) 9,400
    November 1992 Wonder Woman #068 $1.25 (CCo) 10,000
    October 1992 Wonder Woman #067 $1.25 (CCo) 10,950
    September 1992 Wonder Woman #066 $1.25 (CCo) 11,450
    August 1992 Wonder Woman #065 $1.25 (CCo) 12,050
    July 1992 Wonder Woman #064 $1.25 (CCo) 12,050
    June 1992 Wonder Woman #063 $1.25 (CCo) 13,550
    May 1992 Wonder Woman Special $1.75 (CCo) 17,400
    February 1992 Wonder Woman #062 $1.00 (CCo) 17,100 Last Perez
    January 1992 Wonder Woman #061 $1.00 (CCo) 21,100

    ++++++++++

    November 1991 Wonder Woman #060 $1.00 (CCo) 19,750
    October 1991 Wonder Woman #059 $1.00 (CCo) 16,850
    September 1991 Wonder Woman #058 $1.00 (CCo) 18,950
    August 1991 Wonder Woman #057 $1.00 (CCo) 10,750
    July 1991 Wonder Woman #056 $1.00 (CCo) 10,450
    June 1991 Wonder Woman #055 $1.00 (CCo) 10,500
    May 1991 Wonder Woman #054 $1.00 (CCo) 10,800
    April 1991 Wonder Woman #053 $1.00 (CCo) 11,050
    March 1991 Wonder Woman #052 $1.00 (CCo) 11,050
    February 1991 Wonder Woman #051 $1.00 (CCo) 11,450
    January 1991 Wonder Woman #050 $1.50 (CCo) 13,200

    ++++++++++

    December 1990 Wonder Woman #049 $1.00 (CCo) 11,600
    November 1990 Wonder Woman #048 $1.00 (CCo) 11,200
    October 1990 Wonder Woman #047 $1.00 (CCo) 11,200
    September 1990 Wonder Woman #046 $1.00 (CCo) 11,400
    August 1990 Wonder Woman #045 $1.00 (CCo) 11,400
    July 1990 Wonder Woman #044 $1.00 (CCo) 11,850
    June 1990 Wonder Woman #043 $1.00 (CCo) 12,200
    May 1990 Wonder Woman #042 $1.00 (CCo) 12,500
    April 1990 Wonder Woman #041 $1.00 (CCo) 12,600
    March 1990 Wonder Woman #040 $1.00 (CCo) 13,400
    February 1990 Wonder Woman #039 $1.00 (CCo) 13,950
    January 1990 Wonder Woman #038 $1.00 (CCo) 14,600

    ++++++++++

    December 1989 Wonder Woman #037 $1.00 (CCo) 14,650
    November 1989 Wonder Woman #036 $1.00 (CCo) 49,900
    October 1989 Wonder Woman #035 $1.00 (CCo) 15,650
    September 1989 Wonder Woman #034 $1.00 (CCo) 16,100
    August 1989 Wonder Woman #033 $1.00 (CCo) 16,300
    July 1989 Wonder Woman #032 $1.00 (CCo) 17,450
    June 1989 Wonder Woman #031 $1.00 (CCo) 17,000
    May 1989 Wonder Woman #030 $1.00 (CCo) 17,450
    April 1989 Wonder Woman #029 $1.00 (CCo) 17,900
    March 1989 Wonder Woman #028 $1.00 (CCo) 17,950
    February 1989 Wonder Woman #027 $1.00 (CCo) 18,150
    January 1989 Wonder Woman #026 $1.00 (CCo) 20,200
    January 1989 Wonder Woman #025 $1.00 (CCo) 21,550

    ++++++++++

    Holiday 1988 Wonder Woman #024 $1.00 (CCo) 19,150
    December 1988 Wonder Woman #023 $1.00 (CCo) 20,850
    November 1988 Wonder Woman #022 $1.00 (CCo) 20,100
    October 1988 Wonder Woman #021 $1.00 (CCo) 21,250
    September 1988 Wonder Woman #020 $0.75 (CCo) 21,000
    August 1988 Wonder Woman #019 $0.75 (CCo) 21,100
    July 1988 Wonder Woman #018 $0.75 (CCo) 21,900
    June 1988 Wonder Woman #017 $0.75 (CCo) 21,400
    May 1988 Wonder Woman #016 $0.75 (CCo) 25,750
    April 1988 Wonder Woman #015 $0.75 (CCo) 23,650
    March 1988 Wonder Woman #014 $0.75 (CCo) 23,450
    February 1988 Wonder Woman #013 $0.75 (CCo) 28,050
    January 1988 Wonder Woman #012 $0.75 (CCo) 27,800

    ++++++++++

    December 1987 Wonder Woman #011 $0.75 (CCo) 22,700
    November 1987 Wonder Woman #010 $0.75 (CCo) 24,600
    October 1987 Wonder Woman #009 $0.75 (CCo) 24,200
    September 1987 Wonder Woman #008 $0.75 (CCo) 24,400
    August 1987 Wonder Woman #007 $0.75 (CCo) 23,450
    July 1987 Wonder Woman #006 $0.75 (CCo) 22,200
    June 1987 Wonder Woman #005 $0.75 (CCo) 21,600
    May 1987 Wonder Woman #004 $0.75 (CCo) 23,050
    April 1987 Wonder Woman #003 $0.75 (CCo) 22,700
    March 1987 Wonder Woman #002 $0.75 (CCo) 25,650
    February 1987 Wonder Woman #001 $0.75 (CCo) 39,250
    Last edited by AndyMangels; 11-30-2010 at 01:10 AM.

  15. #30
    Thinker Tom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhiannon View Post
    Wonder Woman is still selling 30-60 thou and I think we should try to be more positive instead of complaining all the time about some weird arbitrary marker of success.
    Wonder Woman is NOT selling 30-60 thousand, no matter how much you may want it to be so. And sales charts are the only real way to measure how a book is doing, so there's nothing arbitrary about them at all.

    Look, I think it's silly when readers get into the minutiae of sales charts, but pretending like they don't exist or pretending that they're saying something other than what they're saying is just as, if not more, silly.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •