Page 1 of 24 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 355
  1. #1
    BANNED Decepticons_Rule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    366

    Default When do you think Spidey will get back to normal again?

    When do you think Marvel will pull the plug on this BND stuff?

    I miss seeing him and MJ as a wedded couple, with Pete teaching, and just battling villains with an established past.

  2. #2
    Sad Hawkguy in the snow CyberHubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    22,661

    Default

    Hopefully never.

    Fingers crossed!
    I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!

    If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
    -Theophilus

  3. #3
    Moderator Mister Mets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Posts
    21,122

    Default

    The definition of normal varies.

    Some would say this is it.
    Sincerely,
    Thomas Mets

    Formerly,
    Cyberman

    Blog,
    What Would Spidey Do?

  4. #4
    Team Harry Regulus B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CyberHubbs View Post
    Hopefully never.

    Fingers crossed!
    Here's to this. Toes crossed too, for extra luck.

  5. #5
    Magic. Got it. Johnny Sorrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Very soon.

    Fingers crossed!
    "This is the best movie I've ever seen. It has a vampire and an explosion!"

  6. #6
    HAIL SATAN! BlackToe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,033

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CyberHubbs View Post
    Hopefully never.

    Fingers crossed!
    I put some ancient mojo magic on this. Almost cost me my soul... If it wasnt for Qual'thok and his merry band of bandits, I would'nt have prevailed against Ka and her soul scepter of doom.

    Then the goddamn Locnar came along for some reason...

    Yeah thats right...I'm using Heavy Metal references!
    Peter Parker is a adulterous heathen - Jeffgamer

  7. #7
    Impressive Endless Flight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    N.H.
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Maybe when Joe Q leaves as EiC. I wouldn't bet on any sooner.
    "DC editors in the sixties would have scoffed at the notion of a "brilliant" comic book. It was an oxymoron." - Jim Shooter

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    335

    Default

    I wonder if the next editor of chief comes in and he happened to be the marriage fan and restore it, I wonder if he would be hated by the those who like the BND as much as Joe was by marriage fans.

    Yeah sorry, hate is too much of a strong word even how about angry. I guess.

    I'm all for the marriage restore and the character development, just letting you know but I try to keep my mouth shut most of the matter because I don't want to piss off anyone or start augment.

  9. #9
    Junior Member MathC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    166

    Default

    There is no need for a marriage to tell good spidey stories. I think that reverting back to the previous status quo and doing as if OMD had not happenned would be even more lame than OMD. I mean, OMD wasn't a good idea, but let's not make any more of a mess of the continuity and just deal with this new status quo.

  10. #10
    Spider-man/DCU Moderator ShaggyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In Moderator land
    Posts
    28,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Decepticons_Rule View Post
    When do you think Marvel will pull the plug on this BND stuff?
    Come on never.......

    I miss seeing him and MJ as a wedded couple, with Pete teaching, and just battling villains with an established past.
    1) Pete and Mj was played out
    2) Pete should have never been a teacher.... 9-5 in a classroom gets in the way of being spider-man from 9-5...... Stupid concept.
    3) Hes doing fine with new characters that have there past being established.... Plus they are using old enemies from time to time.

    I think spidey is back to normal and i hope they dont go back to what you suggest as i find it abnormal.
    Last edited by ShaggyB; 06-02-2009 at 07:35 AM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member oldschool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,696

    Default

    As Mets so eloquently said, the definition of normal varies. To me, ASM #546 represented a resounding return to form and the book has very steadily gotten better with almost every issue since. To me, the book felt lost and off-kilter thoughout much (though not all) of JMS' run and was marked by poor writing during other periods (Mackie, O'Neill). Right now, I feel it has "recentered" Peter as Spidey, breathed new life into the old cast, introduced new supporting cast and villains and showcased very good writers and artists. So.....I'm digging it!!
    "What oldschool said"
    The Shadow, 2008

  12. #12
    Impressive Endless Flight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    N.H.
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    I don't think the book centers on Peter at all now. It seems to center on his supporting cast.

    You might as well call the book Harry Osborn guest starring Peter Parker.
    "DC editors in the sixties would have scoffed at the notion of a "brilliant" comic book. It was an oxymoron." - Jim Shooter

  13. #13
    Junior Member MathC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Endless Flight View Post
    I don't think the book centers on Peter at all now. It seems to center on his supporting cast.

    You might as well call the book Harry Osborn guest starring Peter Parker.
    A good supporting cast is often sign of a great book. Also, I don't get what you mean, Peter is still very much the center of every story.

  14. #14
    Impressive Endless Flight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    N.H.
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MathC View Post
    A good supporting cast is often sign of a great book. Also, I don't get what you mean, Peter is still very much the center of every story.
    It can be. Depends on the book.

    I think in this case, they overcompensated too much from the JMS era.

    With Peter having no romantic life whatsoever right now, it makes it seem even worse.
    "DC editors in the sixties would have scoffed at the notion of a "brilliant" comic book. It was an oxymoron." - Jim Shooter

  15. #15
    Senior Member oldschool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MathC View Post
    A good supporting cast is often sign of a great book. Also, I don't get what you mean, Peter is still very much the center of every story.
    Yeah, well said. If you go back to all of what are considered to be the classic runs on this title (Lee, Stern, DeMatteis), they all had a healthy emphasis on the supporting cast. And why not? It is/was one of the best in comics.....one more reason, I thought the Mackie and JMS runs did not work for me: they either killed off or ignored every supporting cast member.
    "What oldschool said"
    The Shadow, 2008

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •