Because your brain didn't get freezed up enough today:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...its-arrow.html
Because your brain didn't get freezed up enough today:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...its-arrow.html
one of the highest principles of America is that we're a nation of people from different backgrounds living in equal dignity and mutual loyalty - Eboo Patel.
I hate that theory. It is wrong. I can prove it's wrong with a simple thought experiment.Such a conjecture might hold if the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is shown to be correct, Maccone says. This scenario proposes that the universe is actually made up of a multitude of parallel universes, one for every physical possibility.
Flip a coin. What are the odds that it will land either heads or tails? 50/50?
No. There is a 100% chance that it will land either heads or tails. It is just that there is no way to know which, until you flip that coin and observe the result.
So it is for everything, every so-called random possibility. There is always a 100% chance of something happening. It is just that we don't know what that will be until it happens.
So, even if there are other quantum realities, they will be identical to ours. Nothing will be different. They will be the same right down to the last molecule.
virtue untested is innocence
What he's saying is that there is no variance in the condition of an event. Play that event back a million times and it will happen exactly the same way each and every time, because every quantum particle is in the exact same spot at that exact same moment. Or side-step into any of the "other worlds" and watch the same event happen and there will be no variance, since there is no variance in the basic particles.
What he fails to acknowledge is that the theory specifically states that the variance occurs as its premise, based on wave theory and the like. He's dismissing the theory because he dismisses the premise.
I don't have the luxury of dismissing such theory because I'm fully aware that there's so much that I don't know.
Last edited by Dreadstar; 09-02-2009 at 03:28 PM.
I understand it fine. Flipping a coin, rolling a dice, or deciding between chips and beans for dinner, are more than a matter of luck.
The outcome is determined by all preceding factors - time of day, weather patterns, temperature, the electrical impulses in your brain at that exact moment in time.
Cause and Effect. Chaos Theory (a misnomer if ever there was one, there's nothing chaotic about it).
All preceding factors, everything that is set up in the universe at that exact moment in time determines the only possible outcome of an event. Only one possibility. There can be no other.
virtue untested is innocence
one of the highest principles of America is that we're a nation of people from different backgrounds living in equal dignity and mutual loyalty - Eboo Patel.
Only if you ignore most of Heisenberg and everyone after him, at the quantum level predicting through cause ad effect becomes and exercise in probability with some outcome likely but a nearly infinite number of possibilities, and the electron that jumps shells may very well end up across the universe instead of the next shell.
There is a lot of chaos in chaos theory, the same starting conditions in truly complex systems don't produce identical results every time, they are likely to be similar but random and unpredictable factors do apply
Bookmarks