Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    90

    Question A Force of Nature: Rulk = Joker?

    I hope people read the message instead of just snapping to the title, because as a Hulk fan I just want to express something I fear is going to happen.

    I am worried that Loeb is basically trying to write a "Joker" character for Hulk, in the way that Rulk just shows and starts causing havoc just for the sake of it to write interesting stories.

    Meaning that in Loeb's run, we will never find out who or what Red Hulk his until some other writer takes over many years down the line and puts his spin on it.

    My problem if this is the way to go is not the concept but the execution. The Joker (and others like him) are so well written and have so much of a contrast quirk that they stand out thus not needing for any background to make a dynamic interesting.

    The problem with Rulk if they decide to go this rout is that as Loeb put it: He is just everything that the Green Hulk is not, to a tee. This just to me comes off as lazy writing. The Hulk has had some very good, well written villains and I think he not only deserves more of those but deserves better than this.

    Uh...yea. Hope everyone understood my view weather you agree or not.
    Last edited by Sidepocket; 11-14-2008 at 08:45 PM.

  2. #2
    Cat smells like fish StoneGold's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    43,831

    Default

    There's going to be some identity and motive involved. It's been teased to much, and Loeb loves his mysteries too much. Whether or not that will leave you satisfied is another story, but I don't think Rulk will simply be.
    The Punisher: I’m going to cauterize your rectum, sealing it shut, so when you turn those delicious Pink Pants™ Fruit Pies into waste products the bilirubin in your feces will leach into your bloodstream and you’ll die screaming! And I’ll watch while having sex with this grateful prostitute!

    Trussed-Up Hooker: Blueberry are my favorite!

    In other words, what StoneGold said.
    -Expletive Deleted

    Check out my travel site, Geekations.com

  3. #3
    devoid of tact gorthon616's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,582

    Default

    i like how you use Lobe instead of it's proper spelling... good way to throw off the haters.

    and no. the thing with the joker is that they never really did a whole mystery of "who is the Joker?" thing. while they are doing that with Rulk. it seems clear that the identity of Rulk is part of the story, whereas with the joker it never was.

  4. #4
    Junior Member Gadget3440's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    163

    Default

    I totally agree with your penultimate sentence. While I think there's nothing original about Rulk whatsoever, that deosn't mean he could not be used a lot better than Loeb's currently doing with his lazy writing.

    Anyway, this mystery that Loeb's built is not conducive to the creation of Joker-esque character. There's been too much surrounding the "who" aspect of Rulk, and because of the nature of Gamma spawn and the clues info from Hulk #3 (the SHEILD retina scan), we pretty much know there's a dual character involved, one who (to an extent) is known to the MU.

    On the other hand, rolling with the gist of your argument, perhaps a better analogy would have been Hobgoblin. To me, Hobgoblin fits much better with your concerns than Joker does.

  5. #5
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gadget3440 View Post
    On the other hand, rolling with the gist of your argument, perhaps a better analogy would have been Hobgoblin. To me, Hobgoblin fits much better with your concerns than Joker does.
    Good point.

    It is just like, they have potential for a good character idea but it is too heavy to get off the runway. :rolleyes:

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •