Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 64
  1. #1
    Mild-Mannered Reporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    21,272

    Default CBR: X-POSITION: Mike Carey & Daniel Way

    Writers Mike Carey and Daniel Way answer <I>your</I> questions about the big
    Wolverine/Professor X crossover, "X-Men: Original Sin," continuing through
    "Wolverine: Origins" and "X-Men: Legacy." Plus <b>exclusive art!</b>


    Full article here.

  2. #2
    Were You There? Michael P's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Location, Location!
    Posts
    30,047

    Default

    John Barber could stand to brush up on his history:

    DW: If anything, Professor X knows more about Logan than Logan does. And yes, the Weapon X series of experiments conducted on Wolverine took place sometime between the mid-to late-fifties and the late sixties, “Marvel time.”

    JB: But the experiments where he got the Adamantium happened after the Korean War.
    "Between the mid-to-late fifties and the late sixties" would qualify as "after the Korean War," John. Did you perhaps mean Vietnam?
    "If you can't say anything good about someone, sit right here by me." - Alice Roosevelt Longworth, on manners

    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's whether I win or lose." - Peter David, on life

  3. #3
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    1,593

    Default

    Awesome a Castlemere & Mercedes VS. Wolverine match! XP
    Last edited by greenshoes713; 10-07-2008 at 05:12 PM.

  4. #4
    New Member Karn Evil 9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    In “Wolverine: Origins” #28, we see Wolverine meeting Professor X for the first time…except they had already met before in the Korean War, right?
    I'm sorry, can anyone tell me if there's an issue with a backstory for this? It seems I've missed this somehow.

  5. #5
    Alpha Male rwsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael P View Post
    John Barber could stand to brush up on his history:

    "Between the mid-to-late fifties and the late sixties" would qualify as "after the Korean War," John. Did you perhaps mean Vietnam?
    Yeah, he must've meant after Vietnam because, as shown in the second Wolverine: Origins arc with Nuke, Logan did not have the adamantium in 'Nam.

  6. #6

    Default

    What's more important, WTF happened with Silver Fox? How did she die only to turn up in Team X? Is that going to be explained!







    yes, i know i'm the only one who gives a shit.

  7. #7
    Look me in the eye... Obsidian Thought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    466

    Smile

    Wow.. I just love how Mike Carey breaks down the way he portrays the X-men; I don't know about the rest of you but it seems to me he has a hell of a grasp on some of the these X-folks. I think that's what makes for good storytellin', when you know who you're writing about. I think I'll start collecting Legacy (in graphic novel form) when I get the chance.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Canemacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidian Thought View Post
    Wow.. I just love how Mike Carey breaks down the way he portrays the X-men; I don't know about the rest of you but it seems to me he has a hell of a grasp on some of the these X-folks. I think that's what makes for good storytellin', when you know who you're writing about. I think I'll start collecting Legacy (in graphic novel form) when I get the chance.
    I find him to be pretty hit-or-miss. For example, I generally like his Iceman despite not being a fan of the character, but his fawning attitude towards Mystique is very grating. He nailed Cable, but his Gambit is laughably bad, almost Milligan caliber.The man writes an awesome Sinister though(when he isn't getting killed via headlock that is :rolleyes: ).
    "What can change the nature of a man?"

  9. #9
    Look me in the eye... Obsidian Thought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    466

    Cool

    I have most of "Supernovas" but I still haven't read it yet; from what I read on the net and hear, he's got a lock on certain X-characters and this interview proves it.

    On a side note, greenshoes, that was Mercedes of the Hellfire Club fighting wolvie in that panel? Isn't she a new character? I thought she was a brunette?

  10. #10
    Rand International claimtosubclaim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA / San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,697

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canemacar View Post
    He nailed Cable, but his Gambit is laughably bad, almost Milligan caliber.
    Well, that's because nobody cares about Gambit.
    Carey only brought him in due to an editorial edict and because of his ties to Rogue.

    The only time I feel Carey has written someone out of character was Cannonball in Divided We Stand, and that was partially due to editorial edict as well. (Sam joining the New Brotherhood was a red herring, so we had to have a misleading story that showed him "going bad.")
    Last edited by claimtosubclaim; 10-07-2008 at 08:42 PM.

  11. #11
    AssKickerOfTheFantastic DasPoppen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    558

    Default

    The bottom line is that I am bringing Professor X back in from the cold, but I'm doing it in a way that doesn't deny any of the character beats already defined for him
    God bless Mike Carey. The X-line can be happy to have him as a writer!

  12. #12
    Sarcastic Red Savina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    186

    Default

    I like Mike Carey.

    I just wish his writing was a bit perkier.

    On one hand, I really believe he respects the line and the characters but on the other I think he takes the X-History and his approach to the adult heroes characterization much too seriously. When Ramos or Bachelo aren't there to lighten up the mood, the somber tone goes dull very quickly.



    I hope Daken joins up Rogue and the crew after this phase of adjectiveless X-Men wraps.

  13. #13
    salt in my porridge jarrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    23,645

    Default

    Yeah, I don;t get much "miss" from Carey. I think his weakest characters so far have probably been Gambit, Husk and Nightcrawler, but when compared to the characters he's done exceedingly well (Xavier, Rogue, Emma, Cyclops, Beast, Mystique, Iceman, Cannonball, Mastermind, Magneto, Cable, Sabretooth, Shaw, Karima, etc) it's no contest. And even his weaker characters aren't necessarily "off", it's usually narrative leads and demands that weaken the portrayals imo.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Canemacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by claimtosubclaim View Post
    Carey only brought him in due to an editorial edict and because of his ties to Rogue.
    He brought Gambit in because the mess Milligan made of the character was dumped into his lap when he followed him up on the book. How he managed to take a character that was at an all time low and go even lower is anyone's guess.

    Quote Originally Posted by jarrod View Post
    And even his weaker characters aren't necessarily "off", it's usually narrative leads and demands that weaken the portrayals imo.
    I wouldn't say that.

    His Sunfire was a cardboard cutout villain with no personality or motivation. This isn't even consistent with what milligan did to the character; Sunfire was at least half-rational. When a character looked better in the Blood of apocalypse arc than they do in yours, you've got problems. He may as well have been twirling a mustache and tying girls to train tracks.

    His Gambit is just all kinds of bad. The dialogue is stilted, accent is way overdone, the French incomprehensible, and he can't even keep the character's power consistent. One minute he's being scranned by every telepath that comes along, the next he's charging flesh but couldn't charge an inanimate cage.

    His Mystique was particularly grating. He keeps pushing this sympathetic angle that just doesn't wash and dumbs down everyone around her so she can get away with the stuff she does. No, fighting off a badguy doesn't make up for disemboweling your daughter. At least his rogue is fallable to some extent.

    Then we have inexplicable things like Emma telepathically blocking sinister from a world away, Mystique out-muscling Sinister, Emma slapping Charles around telepathically, Iceman being seduced by mystique, etc. Basically, he's good at snappy dialogue and interesting plots, but his characterization isn't all people make it out to be; he writes the characters to fit his story rather than writing his story to fit the characters.
    Last edited by Canemacar; 10-08-2008 at 08:28 AM.
    "What can change the nature of a man?"

  15. #15
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    1,593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidian Thought View Post
    I have most of "Supernovas" but I still haven't read it yet; from what I read on the net and hear, he's got a lock on certain X-characters and this interview proves it.

    On a side note, greenshoes, that was Mercedes of the Hellfire Club fighting wolvie in that panel? Isn't she a new character? I thought she was a brunette?
    I was just guessing tho

    Maybe Deodato decided to change the color

    P.S. Wolverine was also fighting a wolf man

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •