To my understanding, this isn't quite right - the money for the DC-owned properties that would otherwise go to Moore is being given to his artistic collaborators, and while Moore deserves his share, it'd be hard to find a better second choice for who deserves that money than the artists.Unless the money comes with a contract saying that that bans you from expressing an opinion on the film, it's not hush money or buy-off money. It's money you earned with your work, even if it's indirect money, and it's yours by right. Not taking it just keeps it in the pockets of people who deserve it less than you do. (The other option, donating it to charity, while noble and a good example and all, is still taking the money; you're just spending it differently than most people would.)
It may explain why David Lloyd and Dave Gibbons seem eversomuchmoreso happy about the films. (Well, that and that the movies do a good job of bringing what they did to the screen, even if V - obviously, the only of the two I've seen - did only so-so in capturing what Moore did.)




Bookmarks