Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    :( K-DoG7p7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    9,406

    Default Attack on Iran comming soon?

    http://www.metimes.com/International..._in_gulf/7724/ <-- published ... MONDAY not 2003 or 1990 :P

  2. #2
    ShaunN
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Fredericton, NB
    Posts
    2,143

    Default

    Dear KDog,

    It sounds like this is more about enforcing a blockade, as opposed to launching an attack. Of course, the one could easily lead to the other.

    Right now, given things like the price of oil, causing a conflict that could close down the Strait of Hormuz seems to make little sense, but a lot that Western powers do makes little sense. They are caught in a paradigm that has to see Iran as an enemy, and they are unable and unwilling to think outside of the box on this.

    Sincerely,

    Shaun

  3. #3
    Elder Member Charles RB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    33,892

    Default

    It's nearly impossible that the French, British and American governments would be able to plan this without it being made public in one of those three countries, especially when military action has to be agreed by parliament or equivalent thereof and they do open meetings.
    "We must fight on!"
    "We'll die. We fight and we die, that's how it goes."
    "Then we die gloriously!"
    "There's an important word there, and it's not gloriously."
    - Only You Can Save Mankind

  4. #4
    :( K-DoG7p7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    9,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles RB View Post
    It's nearly impossible that the French, British and American governments would be able to plan this without it being made public in one of those three countries, especially when military action has to be agreed by parliament or equivalent thereof and they do open meetings.
    Stop using logic !!

  5. #5
    Elder Member Charles RB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    33,892

    Default

    I didn't even mention the impossibility of mobilising three armed forces for overseas combat, invasion and occupation without anyone noticing.
    "We must fight on!"
    "We'll die. We fight and we die, that's how it goes."
    "Then we die gloriously!"
    "There's an important word there, and it's not gloriously."
    - Only You Can Save Mankind

  6. #6
    Senior Member Buzz Dixon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles RB View Post
    I didn't even mention the impossibility of mobilising three armed forces for overseas combat, invasion and occupation without anyone noticing.
    ...uh...they're already in the neighborhood, y'know...

  7. #7
    Elder Member Charles RB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    33,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buzz Dixon View Post
    ...uh...they're already in the neighborhood, y'know...
    Yeah, but they're occupied. You'd need to send new troops in if only to replace the first lot in Iraq & Afghanistan.
    "We must fight on!"
    "We'll die. We fight and we die, that's how it goes."
    "Then we die gloriously!"
    "There's an important word there, and it's not gloriously."
    - Only You Can Save Mankind

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •