Thread where you can ask various Spider-man related questions

[Rere]

Alright, small question here:

Was the Edward in SM:Reign suppose to be Brock? Reading some summaries like the ones on Wikipedia, it makes it sound like a different character/host.

Uh. I'm pretty sure that was indeed Eddie Brock. Well, at least I never read anything stating otherwise.

In fact, the Wiki entry for 'Venom' even list Eddie Brock as Venom in that alternate universe appearance.

I could be wrong though.

[KirkWarren]

Yeah. Basically, Cletus found a new symbiote on another planet.

I'm torn as to whether Marvel should address it.
1. It's got slight potential.
2. It was a shitty obscure story.

Doesnt really matter at this point. Sentry took Carnage into space and ripped him in half and left him there during the opening arc of New Avengers. Issue 6 or something I believe. Hasnt been seen since.

[Venom]

Doesnt really matter at this point. Sentry took Carnage into space and ripped him in half and left him there during the opening arc of New Avengers. Issue 6 or something I believe. Hasnt been seen since.

He could well be back in Mighty Avengers #8. If it is true then I hope he rips Sentry in half.

[agirlyman]

Howdy Brethren,

Could somebody tell me what mag this pic is from?



Thanks!

[Dawidos]

Spectacular Spider-Man V2 #25 (#288). This woman Spider-Man is kissing is the daughter of Gwen Stacy. Don't worry. Peter doesn't cheat on Mary Jane. The cover is misleading ;)

[agirlyman]

Spectacular Spider-Man V2 #25 (#288). This woman Spider-Man is kissing is the daughter of Gwen Stacy. Don't worry. Peter doesn't cheat on Mary Jane. The cover is misleading ;)

You know what I just found out the whole deal, and let me tell you "Sins Past" is pure horsesh!t! Gwen Stacy would never do that to Peter, ever . Somebody better recon, or magic that bs out of existence.

Greg Land is a great artist by the way! lol

[agirlyman]

Amazing Spiderman #75 vol 1 who dies? I remember reading this reprint in Marvel Tales, but I'll be damned if I can't remember.

[Sean Whitmore]

I think that was the one where Silvermane drank something that he thought would make him immortal, but instead it de-aged him into nothingness (which didn't stop him from eventually coming back as a cyborg with an old-man face).


SEAN

[agirlyman]

I think that was the one where Silvermane drank something that he thought would make him immortal, but instead it de-aged him into nothingness (which didn't stop him from eventually coming back as a cyborg with an old-man face).


SEAN

Lmao I remember that issue, thanks Sean!

[Mr.50]

Do you remember what issue numbers those were?

Mr.50

Ok. Well, I'll give it a shot.

I think what you are calling 'the Queen arc' was actually a 6-issue long Spectacular Spider-Man arc (the 2nd volume, released back in 2003) that were primary divided into 2 arcs that were named 'Under My Skin' (the 1st two issues) and 'Changes' (for the other 4).

All of it was written by Paul Jenkins, but when it comes to art is a bit more trick; Michael Ryan did the art of the first arc, Humberto Ramos took care of the first 2 issues of the second arc and finally Paco Medina did the art on the last 2 issues of the 'Changes' arc.

[Rere]

Do you remember what issue numbers those were?

Mr.50

Sure.

Spectacular Spider-Man (vol. 2) #15-16 ('Under my Skin' arc) and Spectacular Spider-Man (vol. 2) #17-20 ('Changes' arc).

[Mr.50]

Much obliged Rere. :)

Mr.50

[Joe Acro]

I've noticed in various places that the Peter Parker: Spider-Man comics of the reboot and beyond are considered Spider-Man Vol. 2. I know that Spider-Man Vol. 1 did have the heading Peter Parker: Spider-Man for a time, but I don't believe it ever officially changed names, much like how the X-Men had Uncanny on the cover for years before the title was officially changed.

So why do people refer to Peter Parker: Spider-Man as Spider-Man Vol 2?

[Duy]

I've noticed in various places that the Peter Parker: Spider-Man comics of the reboot and beyond are considered Spider-Man Vol. 2. I know that Spider-Man Vol. 1 did have the heading Peter Parker: Spider-Man for a time, but I don't believe it ever officially changed names, much like how the X-Men had Uncanny on the cover for years before the title was officially changed.

So why do people refer to Peter Parker: Spider-Man as Spider-Man Vol 2?

Both Amazing and Peter Parker were relaunched, sometime in like 99, I think. Amazing recently returned to the original vol. 1 numbering; Peter Parker has not, so it's still number 2.

[Joe Acro]

Both Amazing and Peter Parker were relaunched, sometime in like 99, I think. Amazing recently returned to the original vol. 1 numbering; Peter Parker has not, so it's still number 2.

But what I'm saying is that there wasn't a Peter Parker: Spider-Man prior to the relaunch. The title with that on it's cover was always officially just Spider-Man. Why isn't it just considered Peter Parker: Spider-Man vol. 1?