PDA

View Full Version : Ethan Van Sciver subliminal art.


Harry
12-19-2005, 12:08 AM
Hopefully I'm posting this in the right forum.

Hot on the heels of New X-Men 118 (kind of) which featured the word "sex" subliminally inserted in the background of almost every page, Van Sciver claims to have inserted subliminal images in both his Batman/Catwoman prestige format series and in Green Lantern #4 (an image he prays no one finds, apparently.) I've spent a good amount of time at work examining these pages with my usual stunted attention span, and as a result have found NOTHING, except now I'm paranoid and seeing subliminal images anywhere.

Anyway, the point of this thread is... anyone have any idea exactly what's hidden in these issues?

hitokiri_
12-19-2005, 01:25 AM
oh that. the tentacle of kilowog... oh, it's his tounge. it's near jordan's crotch.

generalbradicus
12-19-2005, 03:48 PM
Hopefully I'm posting this in the right forum.

Hot on the heels of New X-Men 118 (kind of) which featured the word "sex" subliminally inserted in the background of almost every page, Van Sciver claims to have inserted subliminal images in both his Batman/Catwoman prestige format series and in Green Lantern #4 (an image he prays no one finds, apparently.) I've spent a good amount of time at work examining these pages with my usual stunted attention span, and as a result have found NOTHING, except now I'm paranoid and seeing subliminal images anywhere.

Anyway, the point of this thread is... anyone have any idea exactly what's hidden in these issues?

I found something in the whole series. Gardner not being a tool.

ScottDMSimmons
12-19-2005, 03:59 PM
... and in Green Lantern #4 (an image he prays no one finds, apparently.)

Then why claim that there is one there in the first place?

--Scott

THE OG GL
12-19-2005, 04:01 PM
well your not ment to find them

Harry
12-22-2005, 01:09 AM
Then why claim that there is one there in the first place?
Do you actually want an answer to that question? Becaaaause you'd have to ask him.

kossori
12-28-2005, 07:17 PM
Hmmm.... I'll have took it over again...