PDA

View Full Version : Aeon Flux, or Why Gorgeous Women in Black Leather Will One Day Rule Us All...


Dry Observer
12-04-2005, 12:52 AM
(Originally from my site on superhuman things...)

Aeon Flux (http://www.aeonflux.com/) is a new movie starring Charlize Theron, set in a dark future centuries hence, where the title character fights for freedom against the power of an oppressive government. Now, you might be asking, despite Aeon's clearly superhuman gifts in the original MTV cartoon, and the themes of cybernetic transformation, cloning, etc found in the movie and series, what a gorgeous woman in black leather has to do with transcending human limitations.

The answer, of course, is everything.

Forget the interviews (http://www.filmstew.com/Content/DetailsPrinter.asp?ContentID=12182) and reviews (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/02/AR2005120201384.html). For a moment, even forget the movie and storyline itself (http://homepage.mac.com/merussell/iblog/B835531044/C1162162177/E20051128001823/index.html). When you see someone like Charlize Theron, you see someone with a dozen years of ballerina experience, a Hollywood career and an Academy Award, who worked out for four and a half to five hours a day, six days a week for three and a half months with a trainer from Cirque du Soleil (http://www.filmstew.com/Content/DetailsPrinter.asp?ContentID=12182) just to get ready for this movie.

So, aspiring transhuman, what do you say to her?

Bzzt! Too late! =)

My point here, of course, is not that my readers need to be better at chatting up celebrities. Or maybe you do, but that's your business. Instead, the actress -- and the character -- serve to point out a flaw in the philosophies of many who embrace the idea of transcending their human limitations.

Most people who aspire to being "more than human" are having enough trouble living a fully human life in the first place.

Or to put it another way, most people realize they can't keep track of absolutely everything going on around themselves (given conventional abilities, anyway). So we tend to take mental shortcuts, to tune out information deemed unimportant. A common side effect of highly specialized knowledge and skills, as it happens, is coming to ignore a great deal of the rest of life as irrelevent, or coming to understand other fields primarily in terms of one's own specialty alone.

As a result, many people who embrace the idea that they can become superhuman often latch on to a particular favorite strategy -- which is always to develop one or more of what I like to call "Rapture technologies." These are technologies whose enthusiasts believe will be capable of instantly transforming the world, or at least their discoverers, thus leading to the sudden Ascension of a posthuman "Power" and the instant irrelevence of all other forces and intelligences. Including the whole of humanity.

While it's hard to say whether or not one of the technologies being researched today will have such an impact, much less how quickly, one result of this theory can already be seen today. If you believe research into artificial intelligence is the one thing that will save humanity, and indeed the only thing that can, then you may become an obsessive AI researcher. Or obsessed about supporting AI research. The same holds true if your obsession is nanotech, uploading minds into computers or any other exclusive ultra-technology-that-is-going-to-save-us-all.

The problem here is that, personal philosophies not withstanding, the Singularity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity), if it comes, may come gradually, as the accumulated changes brought about by a host of human augmentations and a legion of technological innovations that, in aggregate, transform the human condition. As opposed to a single, blinding white flash 0.03 microseconds after a circuit closes inside this or that piece of RaptureTech in some underground lab.

This may not seem as elegant an evolution for those who have their hearts set on making their own private godling, but the possibility does bring us back to the movie, and to Aeon Flux.

Ms. Theron's considerable resume is a useful illustration. Many people in transhumanist circles talk about escaping their human limitations, but few of us have lived at anything like our full potential within those limits. This point may be moot if a god-computer raises us all up and grants us new flesh in the time of the nano-apocalypse, but in the case of a more gradual change, it's worth noting...

Charlize Theron is apt to become a transhuman before most if not all of the people reading this article. Why? If the first transhumans are basically just optimized humans who have been optimized again and again and again, what kind of person is apt to have the resources to use biotech augments once they're established as completely safe? Who will be operating in a challenging environment where extended and enhanced youth and beauty, not to mention talent, intelligence and athletic ability, will be absolutely key to her success?

And perhaps most key, who is pushing herself to her limits now, and thus most likely to fully utilize accelerated learning, biotech augments and non-invasive mindtech to become something more than just an "optimal man" when the opportunity arises?

Now, you might say, "You don't know whether or not Charlize Theron is actually interested in any of those things. Sure, she may be interested in improving her skills, but that doesn't mean she'll jump at any of this tech stuff. Even if it's known to work safely."

And you'd have a point. But Ms. Theron is just an illustration.

The point is, if humanity evolves into "superhumanity" by way of a "slow" evolution of biotech, accelerated learning, mind-stimulating devices and other options (cybernetics, limited AI, limited nano), then whoever is pushing forward hardest on all fronts -- developing skills to unheard of levels, acquiring effective, synergized enhancements, making use of revolutionary personal tech, etc -- will presumably cross the finish line first.

Which means that Charlize Theron is probably ahead of most of us looking at the possibility now, even though she presumably doesn't know she's in a race. And meanwhile, most of us are either just standing here watching her head down the final leg, or are slowly, smugly jogging in that direction, confidant that we're well in advance of any potential contenders. (Save perhaps a few friends.)

Imagine if "the superman" turns out to be more like Paul Atreides of Dune than True Omnipotence. Imagine if there are gradations of transhuman, if there are specialties even among these seeming-demi-gods.

Imagine, in short, if humanity still has levels of accomplishment and drive. And if people like Ms. Theron, who are stars in this world, continue to outshine you utterly in that one. And why? Perhaps because while she didn't realize she was in this race, she's been running it as though it mattered. And you haven't been. Because the god-computer is going to reach down and save you in the "end times."

Time to reconsider your habits, perhaps? Or just time to fetch your running shoes?

Or to pray to your false gods? =)

Ralph

shrike
12-04-2005, 01:18 AM
Excuse me, huh?

You've just set off my WTF-ometer.

Put down the bottle and step away, mister...

Lester C.
12-04-2005, 08:32 PM
The weekend box office numbers are now in. Aeon Flux checked in number two this weekend grossing thirteen million dollars. I don’t know if that good or bad but here is the link.

http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/boxoffice/weekend/

Converge
12-04-2005, 08:48 PM
charlise theron is a terrible choice for this role. shes has a look that's a combination girl next door and bull-****. terrible terible choice for this role. they should have gotten someone like angelina joie or that one british actress. what's her name?

Pepsigirl
12-04-2005, 08:52 PM
they should have gotten someone like angelina joie or that one british actress. what's her name?

That one that was in that movie with that guy and that other chick? Yeah, I totally know who you're talking about.

Converge
12-04-2005, 08:54 PM
transhuman = http://www.funnytheworld.com/2005/Feb/RockyTim.jpg

Adam Crocker
12-04-2005, 08:55 PM
Excuse me, huh?

You've just set off my WTF-ometer.

Put down the bottle and step away, mister...

He's using the Aeon Flux movie to start up a philosophical discussion on transhumanism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism), a pet fascination of Dry Observer's, though also an area of interest to Warren Ellis and particularly Grant Morrison (whose New X-Men run was shot through with some transhumanist ideas).

Either way I'll get to this tomorrow, though scanning through his post I find the title misleading since the Aeon Flux film is only tangential to the actual discussion.

Lester C.
12-04-2005, 09:20 PM
He's using the Aeon Flux movie to start up a philosophical discussion on transhumanism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism), a pet fascination of Dry Observer's, though also an area of interest to Warren Ellis and particularly Grant Morrison (whose New X-Men run was shot through with some transhumanist ideas).

Either way I'll get to this tomorrow, though scanning through his post I find the title misleading since the Aeon Flux film is only tangential to the actual discussion.

Thank you. His post is much more coherent and intriguing now that I understand what he’s talking about.

Dry Observer
12-05-2005, 12:27 AM
The weekend box office numbers are now in. Aeon Flux checked in number two this weekend grossing thirteen million dollars. I don’t know if that good or bad but here is the link.

http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/boxoffice/weekend/

Actually, I've heard the movie isn't that good. Unfortunately, or fortunately, I'm probably going to be snowed in for a few days, and so I'll have to wait and hear what more people have to say before I decide whether to check it out. =)

Ralph

BcAugust
12-05-2005, 07:15 AM
Hmm... I saw it and really enjoyed it. It's good technically(story, acting and plot meshed and worked on a technical level), and the effort they went to to build the world shows. That said... it's weird. If you like weird, it's great. If you don't... well, the movie will disappoint. As a friend said, it's live action anime.

Though... I give the filmmakers a lot of credit for really trying out something new with it. It's very much an inspired by the cartoons, rather then based off of them. Jazz in movie form?

DarkCrisis
12-05-2005, 10:08 AM
I saw it. They took ALOT of liberties with the characters which I felt wasn't needed. The core of who Aeon and Trevor are were changed to fit the story.

Over all it was an okay movie. A good way to spend a Sunday afternoon.

Dry Observer
12-05-2005, 01:08 PM
He's using the Aeon Flux movie to start up a philosophical discussion on transhumanism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism), a pet fascination of Dry Observer's, though also an area of interest to Warren Ellis and particularly Grant Morrison (whose New X-Men run was shot through with some transhumanist ideas).

Either way I'll get to this tomorrow, though scanning through his post I find the title misleading since the Aeon Flux film is only tangential to the actual discussion.

Thanks, DJ, though I'd take issue with the thought that the film is really tangential to my argument. Admittedly, I didn't describe everything Charlize Theron did to prepare for that movie -- at the end of that initial training period she hurt her neck, and then had to spend a long time in rehab, followed by yet more training. And all to prepare for a single part she may never revisit.

My point? How many people do you know who are that devoted to self-improvement? Even with a particular goal in mind? Even among those who might talk about being a great athlete, a great artist or writer or scientist or musician, or even about transcending their human limits? Ms. Theron is one of many people who happens to be working very hard at improving her own talents and abilities. She and others like her may not know about extraordinary tech for self-enhancement now... but when they do, who do you think will be at the head of that pack as well?

I ask this question not to annoy, but to point out that most people want to achieve more, but it's often hard for people to focus on how to become better themselves. Or how important these "little choices" could be to my future, and to yours. =)

Ralph

Dennis
12-05-2005, 02:43 PM
My point? How many people do you know who are that devoted to self-improvement?

lots of people work hard at their jobs, including many actors.


jessica simpson talking about the dukes of hazzard:
Q. Did you have to work out to fit in shorts?
A. I worked out a lot, I immediately went on the South Beach diet. I trained for six days a week, two and a half hours a day, which was pretty grueling for me. Especially being in Baton surrounded by lots of Cajun fried goodness.
I hired a trainer and did lots of squats and lunges. I spent an hour a day running on the treadmill. I was determined to look good in those shorts.

Dennis
12-05-2005, 02:48 PM
new age musician Yanni:

"when he was 14 years old, he broke the Greek national freestyle swimming record."

"A very focused individual, he spent 15 hours a day at the keyboards..."

"he gave up pursuit of a Ph.D. in clinical psychology to dedicate himself to working on his music full time."

Bruce Wayne Jr.
12-05-2005, 02:57 PM
..... If I was making the same money, I'D become Aeon Flux! Honestly, what's your point? It's not like she's working out to actually save the world or anything!

And really, if she was improving her talents and abilities, wouldn't she be vying for more roles outside the cartoon adaptation/action/sci-fi genre?

There's a pretty lengthy list of people who deserve praise for self-improvement who come before Ms. Theron.

Dry Observer
12-05-2005, 08:52 PM
Actually, my point isn't that we all need to bow down before Charlize Theron as a living god(ess). Rather, that a lot of people who are big on human potential (not everyone on this list, I know) or who expect one day to be something "more" (whether in the transcendant sense or just in terms of remarkable achievement) are remarkably resistant to doing anything that might substantially improve their circumstances.

I welcome these other examples you guys have given, because they're making much the same point. (All right, maybe Jessica Simpson wasn't making the same degree of effort, but oh well. =) ) Many of the folks who like to talk about these "revolutionary technologies" (nanotech, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, cybernetics) like to imply that "when the Revolution comes," all the folks who used to be on top will be pushed aside by a new, godlike elite (usually the hobbyists themselves, or the researchers), or else the playing field will be leveled for everyone, regardless of personal effort.

I'm suggesting that indeed, things might not go that way. Actually, we could easily end up with a reinforced elite in which only the richest can afford to pay for genetic modifications for themselves or their kids. F. Scott Fitzgerald once wrote, "The rich are different from you and I." In that world, his words would finally be literally true.

On the other hand, a more egalitarian society might offer enhancements of proven safety and benefit to everyone, allowing us all to rise together.

But the point is -- on the one hand, society probably won't make very good choices on these subjects if it doesn't know it's making a decision. And individuals may be forfeiting their opportunity to make decisions altogether. Including, ironically, those who should be keenly aware that there is a choice to be made.

What's your choice? There's a ton of accelerated learning techniques available for free on the Net (http://www.winwenger.com). There's non-invasive technology designed to stimulate human intelligence (http://www.toolsforwellness.com/mind-machines-biofeedback.html). And this is all without getting into more controversial things, like nootropics (Piracetam (http://www.ceri.com/noot.htm), Modafinil (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil), CX717 (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166514,00.html), etc), genetic modifications, other biotech augmentations, or even cybernetics. And it's also without getting into really well known, accepted methods of self-improvement, like exercise, eating right and reading informative books. (Despite popular folklore, your librarian won't actually eat you. Not even if you forget to return books. =) )

Sure, it's one thing to say, "I don't know about all that hi-tech stuff," or "I don't have the time or energy to be working on those things." There are plenty of folks for whom those are legitimate arguments. But I originally wrote this article for that sliver of the population which does know about at least some of them, and which mostly has the resources to pursue them.

You've got to admit, if you know about techniques that don't alter you biologically, but do make you smarter or more creative, then you might ask, "Why don't I use these methods to achieve my own goals? Wouldn't that make more sense than waiting for someone else to do it for me?"

Ralph

Bruce Wayne Jr.
12-06-2005, 10:35 AM
:confused: Nevermind.

Dennis
12-06-2005, 05:35 PM
edit: all this stuff will never be possible.

Night Swordsman
12-06-2005, 06:37 PM
All i have to say is Gorgeous Women in Black Leather can rule me ANYTIME ;)

Preferably with a bag of skittles ;)

Dry Observer
12-06-2005, 11:37 PM
edit: all this stuff will never be possible.

Which part?

What's your choice? There's a ton of accelerated learning techniques available for free on the Net (http://www.winwenger.com/). There's non-invasive technology designed to stimulate human intelligence (http://www.toolsforwellness.com/mind-machines-biofeedback.html). And this is all without getting into more controversial things, like nootropics (Piracetam (http://www.ceri.com/noot.htm), Modafinil (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil), CX717 (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166514,00.html), etc), genetic modifications, other biotech augmentations, or even cybernetics. And it's also without getting into really well known, accepted methods of self-improvement, like exercise, eating right and reading informative books. (Despite popular folklore, your librarian won't actually eat you. Not even if you forget to return books. =) )

All of these things I listed above are already here with us. A scary number of working genetic and other biotech augmentations (for far greater strength, endurance, intelligence and longevity) have already been applied successfully to lab animals.

One of the reasons I talk about these ideas so much more often these days is that breakthroughs are coming faster than most wild-eyed enthusiasts would have guessed, just a couple years ago.

Ralph