PDA

View Full Version : Old Article on Dark Phoenix, Jean Grey, Claremont, Byrne, and the Rescript.


Novaya Havoc
11-14-2005, 10:10 AM
Hey all,

So I like to do research on Dazzler, because I get sick of all the horse-hooey that people "know" about her character, her creater, and her origins.

Recently, I received an old mag with pictures and a lengthy article about the Dark Phoenix Saga - how it was changed that Phoenix had to die, the creation and controversy of the Phoenix character, and some clear "creative differences" between Claremont and Byrne.

I'll post a snippet I transcribed. If people are interested, I'll finish the rest (this is only about 1/2 of the total article) for your viewing pleasure. If anything, it gives a first-hand, contemporary account into Phoenix and the DPS, and will hopefully be of benefit to the fan community, which is unfortunately full of misinformation.

Here we go....
-----

“The Many Alternate Fates of the Phoenix: The Complete Story Behind the Death of Jean Grey”
By Peter Sanderson
From Comics Feature No. 4, July-August, 1980.

----

By now, X-Men readers are well aware that Jean Grey, who was Marvel Girl in the original X-Men and Phoenix in the current group, committed suicide in last month’s conclusion to the “Dark Phoenix” saga (issue 137). What readers may not know is that the “Dark Phoenix” storyline had been planned nearly two years ago, and that numerous possible conclusions had been considered and discarded. In fact, issue 137 was originally completely penciled and scripted with an ending in which Jean Grey survived. The present conclusion, in which she dies, was substituted at the last minute. Comics Feature wishes to thank Marvel editor-in-chief Jim Shooter, X-Men penciller/co-plotter John Byrne and X-Men co-plotter/scripter Chris Claremont for allowing us to publish some of the artwork from the original ending in these pages.

To understand the course of events that led to the decision that Jean had to die in 137, we must look back to the decision to turn her into Phoenix in the first place. Len Wien and Dave Cockrum, the creators of the “new” X-Men series, wrote Jean out of the book in issue 94 along with all the other original X-Men except Scott Summers (Cyclops). When Chris Claremont began plotting the book, he asked Cockrum to bring her back in issue 97, but to make her look like a “young, sophisticated New York collegian” instead of retaining what Claremont calls her former “young middle-American Republican” look. Drawing her this way made Cockrum enthusiastic about the character. He and Claremont decided to change the superheroic name (since “Marvel Girl” sounded too much like the “Ms. Marvel” character then being planned), to change her costume to give her a more striking appearance, and to upgrade her powers to make her more comparable to the group’s other female member, Storm.

Claremont says that he wanted to make Phoenix “a female analogue to Thor, Firelord, and the Silver Surfer,” and thus a heroine on the “cosmic” level of power. He and Cockrum intended that the more she used her power, the more she would become like a god. In face, she would become a “power junkie,” who enjoyed the rush of pleasure exercising her power would bring. This fact, Claremont says, would lead to some interesting storylines. In she used a great deal of her power before she had learned how to control that much of it, she might accidentally wreck havoc. Moreover, if she unleashed even more of this power before she was fully prepared to handle it, her passion for using her power might unbalance her mind as it eventually did in the “Dark Phoenix” serial. Therefore, the X-Men’s mentor, Professor Xavier, would have to train her in the use of her powers. Shooter believes that the concept of the X-Men as a school for super-powered mutants is fundamental to the series’ appeal, but Byrne and Claremont agree that the current X-Men do not need school since except for Colossus they had all been using their powers for years before the new team was formed. Claremont saw the training of Phoenix as a means of bringing back the “school” motif. Moreover, he envisioned creating situations in which Jean was caught between her need to use her powers to rescue the other X-Men, and her awareness of the dangers that using it could create.

When X-Men went monthly, Cockrum left the book and John Byrne took over. Byrne had and still has fundamental objections to Jean’s Phoenix persona. “It’s not that I don’t like Jean Grey,” he explains. “I have an abiding fondness for redheads, and have been in love with Jean when we first ‘met,’ about a million years ago when I was thirteen.” Byrne saw Marvel Girl in the original series as a heroine who pulled her own weight in battle with the team (thereby contrasting, he points out, with Sue Storm of the Fantastic Four), without making a big deal out of the fact.

On the other hand, Byrne regards Phoenix as “too brassy, too loud, too hip and too feministic,” and hence not in keeping with the personality he feels was established for Jean in the “old” X-Men series. Claremont agrees that his treatment of Jean’s personality differs from Stan Lee’s and Jack Kirby’s in the early issues, but says that Jean was becoming more assertive in the issues on which Roy Thomas and Neal Adams collaborated. Claremont says that he relates to the Jean Grey of the latter stories rather than the earlier ones. Besides, he continues, anyone who has been a superheroine for at least seven years of “Marvel-time” would naturally have become more assertive by now.

Byrne does not see why there should be another “strong female character” (in terms of both powers and personality) in the X-Men when they already have Storm. Claremont, on the other hand, attacks what he sees as a double standard in comics that decreed that “ a superhero group can have an infinite number of strong males, but not two strong females.” Byrne argues that the male X-Men do not have equally assertive personalities, and contrasts Colossus and Nightcrawler with Wolverine.

As for strength as measured in terms of sheer power, Byrne believes that Phoenix was too powerful to be a member of a superhero group. She had, after all, saved the entire universe in issue 108. What would there be for the other X-Men to do in stories that had “Phoenix flexing a pinkie and putting everything back to rights while the others had looked on?” Claremont argues that this is not at all and insurmountable problem. If Phoenix stayed in the book, she would stay on a Thor/Surfer power level rather than equaling or surpassing Galactus as she did in 135-137, and, Claremont points out, writers have been able to come up with effective adversaries even for the Surfer. Keeping Phoenix in the book would simply “require a better class of villain” for the X-Men, and “making the villains work for a change.” A villain on the order of Proteus could be used, or villains could come up with means of draining her power, he contends. Moreover, “for all her Phoenix-like ability, she was still heart-and-soul a twenty-four year old woman from upstate New York;” her effectiveness in battle would be limited by her amount of experience and her courage in facing horrifying adversaries. She could be fought through mental disorientation, Claremont says, or psychic domination as in the Mesmero and Wyngarde stories, or through threatening her loved ones. He notes, too, she would be aware that to unleash too much power at the stage of her life and training would be to risk losing control of it and even turning into the evil Dark Phoenix. Byrne maintains, however, that as long as Phoenix was around, “the X-Men had become guest stars in their own comic book.”

When Claremont decided to have the Beast and one of the X-Men get separated from the others at the finale of the Magneto story in 113, Byrne suggested it be Phoenix. As a result, the Phoenix was out of the book for nine issues. Still, the problem of what to do with her had only been postponed, and as the time for her return approached, Byrne began losing interest in the book.

X-Men’s editor also felt that Phoenix should not be a member of the team, and Claremont decided that he did not want to make Byrne “do a character that he’s uncomfortable with” and so “there’s no sense in keeping her around.” But then what would be done with her?

Marvel writer Steven Grant supplied the key by proposing that Phoenix become a villain. Claremont had already decided to bring in the Hellfire Club. Byrne suggested using Mastermind and having Jean psychically enthralled, whereupon Claremont decided to have him turn her into the decadent Black Queen. “Almost simultaneously,” both co-plotters seized upon Grant’s idea for the next plot development: Jean’s psychological transformation into a villainess would be permanent, and the Black Queen would become the comic-powered Dark Phoenix.

But then what would happen to Dark Phoenix? Byrne and Claremont devised at least seven different scenarios, four of which were constructed over the course of three nights! Among them were the following.

Jean would lose her Phoenix powers and once again become Marvel Girl. The problem here was the same as the one that had arisen when Phoenix’s power was limited during the Magneto story (112): it could not be agreed what level of power she should have.

Phoenix would be destroyed but then Jean would show up a few months later, without explanation. The characters would spend months wondering whether Jean would again turn on them, and eventually she would. Jean’s eventual attack seemed too inevitable to create a real sense of mystery, and so this idea was rejected.

-=END FIRST HALF=-

-Ben

xgeek52
11-14-2005, 10:48 AM
*sheesh*...i kinda remember that article...it was the the first time (at least that we knew) there was editorial controversy existed in marvel...y'see there was no internet to speak of and everything we learned about the comic industry was what was published in magazines...

the dark phoenix saga was about a clash of writer concept -- ie how they wanted the direction of the xmen to go and who would lead the charge so to speak...marvel wanted what they wanted, byrne wanted what he wanted; cockrum had had his own ideas and claremont had his own concept...

i had always thought the dark phoenix saga was a flawed concept...as far as the writing and art work was concerned it was -- not a work of genius -- but a well structured novel...but in the back of my mind then, the direction they took by killing jean grey off would only create problems...marvel had written themselves into a corner by doing that...the question lent itself what to do with scott summers and who would lead the xmen...that led to ororo taking over scott walking away, meeting lee forrester and later the madelyne pryor story line...

can we say the clone saga...

so marvel had to figure a way to bring jean back and put the team together again -- hence xfactor...

looking forward to seeing the rest of the article again... :cool:

LoneWolf21
11-14-2005, 12:04 PM
Thanks for typing all that up. That's a very interesting read. If you have the time, you think you could put more up?

Titan76
11-14-2005, 12:08 PM
I remember seeing this a few years back. I wish Claremont had gotton his way and maybe Jean would have gotton her own solo book since Claremont wanted her to be on the same or higher power level then Thor and the Silver Surfer and since she would have been too powerful to stay on the X-men Claremont might have been able to push for her a solo. Claremont was at his prime during this time so I could see him writing a Phoenix solo book and being real successful. But he didn't get his way and its like I have been saying all along which is Jean is the one of the X-men all the writers like to write but have a very hard time writing her because she is so dam powerful. Only one person right now can write her with the power of the Phoenix, Morrison I'm looking right at you! ;)

DDM
11-14-2005, 01:12 PM
Please write up the other half soon.

StarsAndGarters
11-14-2005, 07:18 PM
I would love to read the rest of it. Thank you!

Factor-X
11-14-2005, 07:25 PM
Thank you for posting that, I always like reading about stuff that could of happen in comics.

I might add one of the endings was released in "Phoenix: The Untold Story"

fishtaco
11-14-2005, 07:34 PM
Thanks! Please post the other half.

Babylon23
11-14-2005, 10:46 PM
Interesting article. It's fascinating to read an article so close to the event, as most of the ones I've read were very much after the fact. I didn't realise Steven Grant suggested the villain angle.

milhouse123321
11-14-2005, 11:52 PM
Wow please post the second half!

Novaya Havoc
11-15-2005, 01:30 PM
Hey all -- I'll post it some time tonight. Finals are kicking my butt.

Personally, I thought the Claremont/Byrne dichotomy on the role of "strong" females is interesting. I'm inclined to agree with Claremont that the book shouldn't limit itself to one strong woman. On the other hand, I agree with Byrne that Phoenix was just way too poweful to keep around (and constant personal limitations, depowerings, psonic manipulations and so forth would get REALLY old). Hindsight is of course, 20/20, and we've seen the power levels of Claremont's heroines. What do you all think?

----

In the meantime, you can read about the origins of Dazzler, including how she was created by committee (including then Archie writer, Tom DeFalco!), the delays (and changes) of Dazzler #1, and how the Dazzler series contrasted heavily with her inital X-Men debut.

Dissecting the Dazzler (http://www.geocities.com/benunni/cf-7.rtf).

----

But I'll get up the rest of this for you Dark Phoenix fans.

gary
12-13-2005, 03:41 AM
I found this intersting article by John Byrne that talks about the same thing. I found it intersting that he writes how Chris Claremont's knowledge of the X-Men's history was originally so poor!

http://www.slushfactory.com/content/EpuyFFVEkAlbRiTbIM.php

Babylon23
12-13-2005, 05:16 PM
I found this intersting article by John Byrne that talks about the same thing. I found it intersting that he writes how Chris Claremont's knowledge of the X-Men's history was originally so poor!

http://www.slushfactory.com/content/EpuyFFVEkAlbRiTbIM.php

I find it best to take everything Byrne says with a grain of salt. He often bignotes himself, and puts others down, especially Claremont.

streator
12-13-2005, 07:24 PM
as interesting as this article may be, it was written over 25 years ago. whatever marvel has planned for the phoenix in the future probably has little to do with this and i think some posters need to realize this.

fishtaco
12-13-2005, 07:49 PM
as interesting as this article may be, it was written over 25 years ago. whatever marvel has planned for the phoenix in the future probably has little to do with this and i think some posters need to realize this.Nobody thinks that it's of any relevence. It's still interesting.

Novaya Havoc
12-13-2005, 08:37 PM
as interesting as this article may be, it was written over 25 years ago. whatever marvel has planned for the phoenix in the future probably has little to do with this and i think some posters need to realize this.

Um, I don't think anyone -- least of all me -- is trying to say Phoenix now and then. More it is trying to get at the "behind the scenes" and "inside the minds" of the X-Men writers, to see the arguments and crossroads of one of the X-Men's biggest stories and characters.

Considering that several posters think of people -- especially the Claremont/Byrne team -- as infallible god-creators, it's nice to see the quarrels and to debunk the myths. I like to do that often by highlighting that DeFalco -- not Claremont -- is Dazzler's "creator" (and back it up with primary sources -- interviews -- to boot!).

Guess you must not have liked history in school.

And by the by -- I have transcribed the second half and will get it up soon. I'd forgotten about this!

-B

streator
12-13-2005, 09:41 PM
Um, I don't think anyone -- least of all me -- is trying to say Phoenix now and then. More it is trying to get at the "behind the scenes" and "inside the minds" of the X-Men writers, to see the arguments and crossroads of one of the X-Men's biggest stories and characters.

Considering that several posters think of people -- especially the Claremont/Byrne team -- as infallible god-creators, it's nice to see the quarrels and to debunk the myths. I like to do that often by highlighting that DeFalco -- not Claremont -- is Dazzler's "creator" (and back it up with primary sources -- interviews -- to boot!).
Guess you must not have liked history in school.
And by the by -- I have transcribed the second half and will get it up soon. I'd forgotten about this!

-B
i'm actually a senior history major in college, going to law school next fall. so i do like history and i liked reading what you posted.
i was thinking ahead/more so thinking outside of this thread in terms of what many posters define the phoenix as or consider it to be.
ben, right? correct me if i'm wrong.
i did not mean at all to knock you posting the old article.
i simply meant to say that it's no longer applicable to current understandings of the character and that certain posters should not incorporate it into their perceptions of the character/the future character because it's well in the past regardless of who wrote it and things have changed since.

fishtaco
12-14-2005, 06:36 AM
i'm actually a senior history major in college, going to law school next fall. so i do like history and i liked reading what you posted.
i was thinking ahead/more so thinking outside of this thread in terms of what many posters define the phoenix as or consider it to be.
ben, right? correct me if i'm wrong.
i did not mean at all to knock you posting the old article.
i simply meant to say that it's no longer applicable to current understandings of the character and that certain posters should not incorporate it into their perceptions of the character/the future character because it's well in the past regardless of who wrote it and things have changed since.We know it's not currently applicable or relevant. Since not all of us were reading the X-Men since 1980, it's interesting to see people's perspectives of the Dark Phoenix Saga back then. It is also interesting to see how the story was created and what was originally intended, aside from the stuff we saw in Phoenix: The Untold Story.

comicartfan
12-14-2005, 07:01 AM
Here is a link to more comments about Dark Phoenix and the X-Men in general from Byrne :
Dark Phoenix FAQ (http://www.byrnerobotics.com/FAQ/listing.asp?ID=2&T1=Questions+about+Comic+Book+Projects#39)

Tennoarashi
12-14-2005, 10:27 AM
Byrne does not see why there should be another “strong female character” (in terms of both powers and personality) in the X-Men when they already have Storm. Claremont, on the other hand, attacks what he sees as a double standard in comics that decreed that “ a superhero group can have an infinite number of strong males, but not two strong females.”My bloody hero.