PDA

View Full Version : uncanny 465...

thik_3rd
07-13-2005, 09:28 PM
...marks the 100 issue anniversary since the last time uncanny x-men was a decent comic book. :(
chicainery
07-13-2005, 09:28 PM
...marks the 100 issue anniversary since the last time uncanny x-men was a decent comic book. :(


Thanks for the update. I'll have to get this milestone issue!!!
thik_3rd
07-13-2005, 09:31 PM
me too, for sentimental reasons.
Vegetarian Goat
07-13-2005, 09:36 PM
Not to be rude, but was this thread necessary?

I really enjoy Uncanny X-Men.
Beast
07-13-2005, 09:37 PM
Not to be rude, but was this thread necessary?

I really enjoy Uncanny X-Men.
Not rude at all, Veggie. The thread is totally unnecessary. :)
thik_3rd
07-13-2005, 09:39 PM
is any of this really necessary?
Bishop_Proudstar
07-13-2005, 10:28 PM
...marks the 100 issue anniversary since the last time uncanny x-men was a decent comic book. :(


Submit plots to Marvel...

I'm sure you'll get the job.
thik_3rd
07-13-2005, 10:37 PM
nah, im sucky.
Bishop_Proudstar
07-13-2005, 11:25 PM
nah, im sucky.

Hey! That's "cool" now in comics..
Babylon23
07-14-2005, 12:19 AM
Funny, I was just thinking that 465 marks the 22 issue since X-Men became a great read again.
Brian M.
07-14-2005, 12:30 AM
Was issue 365 really that good?
thik_3rd
07-14-2005, 12:59 AM
Hey! That's "cool" now in comics..
ive noticed.

Was issue 365 really that good?
no, the 100 issues of wackness follows a period of mediocrity.
Brian M.
07-14-2005, 01:24 AM
ive noticed.


no, the 100 issues of wackness follows a period of mediocrity.


Well everyone's got there opinions.
Huzzah!
07-14-2005, 01:29 AM
what the hell was 365? Was that a maggot issue? maggot blew ass like snot rockets
thik_3rd
07-14-2005, 03:01 AM
nah, it wasnt a maggot issue (maggot wasnt that bad actually, bur whatever). it was the last issue before alan davis's run when the series pretty much just got bad and never recovered.
Huzzah!
07-14-2005, 03:13 AM
The x-men were bad after the phalanx showed up. Joe Mad art is the only thing that kept many fans reading it
fishtaco
07-15-2005, 01:20 PM
...marks the 100 issue anniversary since the last time uncanny x-men was a decent comic book. :(Totally unneccesary. A number of people here happen to think Uncanny X-men is the best X-book, including myself. Can you not just create threads for the sole purpose of bashing numerous creators (Lobdell, Kelly, Austen, Claremont, Davis, etc).

And if youre calling everything on forums pointless, then why bother posting here?
Christopher O
07-15-2005, 01:28 PM
Well, I thought Joe Casey produced some really good stuff. He had a bad start, but he really hit a good stride toward the end. Other than that, I've enjoyed very little of this title, since Claremont's first run on the book, but Claremont's current run does have potential. His XSE ideas are really interesting, but he'd rather shunt that to the side and do traditional super-heroics, which aren't really to my tastes when done by him--as many here can tell you. ;)
fishtaco
07-15-2005, 01:32 PM
Im not saying that any of these creators are good or bad (besides Claremont, for obvious reasons), its rude to do that.

What I just realized is that everybody got over this, as it was on the second page. So why the *&#^ did I just bring it back??!?! :confused:

eh. just drop this.
TinMan
07-15-2005, 01:54 PM
The x-men were bad after the phalanx showed up. Joe Mad art is the only thing that kept many fans reading it


and Joe Mad sucked sour frog ass
thik_3rd
07-15-2005, 02:32 PM
Can you not just create threads for the sole purpose of bashing numerous creators (Lobdell, Kelly, Austen, Claremont, Davis, etc).

dont worry, i would never bash lobdell.