PDA

View Full Version : Strange Coinicidence Time: Covers


bartl
06-15-2005, 08:45 AM
Interestingly enough, just last week, in ODDBALL COMICS, I posted one of my not infrequent diatribes about the state of comic covers (how, except for the humor and kid's comics, they're largely just pinups, giving the sales message, "This comic is pretty much like any other one"). And, as an example of covers that sold comics, I posted a link to several ACTION comics covers from 1967 or so, including the one you used as an example (SON OF ANNIHILATOR).

That was the time I started regularly buying comics, and I can tell you that, back then, at age 9-11, the cover had a LOT to do with whether I bought a comic or not. And the covers of ACTION always hooked me in (the one thing I hated was the habit of making the cover scene the last panel of a continued story).

A lot of them were done by Neal Adams. Say what you want about his speed, (or lack thereof), or his writing skills (or lack thereof) but he knew how to make a cover that would sell a comic (not to mention his innovations in story sequencing); probably the reason why DC used him so heavily as a cover artist back then.

Last time I looked at the covers on a comic rack was about three or four weeks ago, and, frankly, they still were all pinups. As I mentioned, the exceptions were the ARCHIE line and DC's CARTOON NETWORK line.

Inkthinker
06-15-2005, 11:13 AM
I'd agree with that on about 90% of the covers I see.

I think that the covers for 100 Bullets by Dave Johnson and the covers for Fables by James Jean are excellent, though, and not "just pin-ups". They show a genuine sense of graphic design and are well-composed and well-executed in unique styles. Of course, it doesn't hurt that those guys have been working as the cover artists for almost every issue of their respective series.

Mignola's "pulp-style" covers are pretty good as well, as are some of Powell's covers for The Goon. And while I'm not reading it, I suppose some credit should be given to the Luna's on Ultra for their series of magazine parody covers.

It's certainly true that more thought should be put into a cover than "let's just draw a splash pinup of one of the female characters, or a fight scene, and slap the logo up at the top".

Steven Grant
06-15-2005, 11:29 AM
I just love that ACTION cover because it's so emblematic of the goofiness of DC at the time. I love the teenage kid dressed like Marlon Brando out of THE WILD ONE over 10 years earlier, and the ridiculous looking supervillain. The whole cover is just kind of goofy -- why is the kid hitting a building to prove himself to Superman instead of just hitting Superman?

But, goofy or not, Neal pulls it off great. I think it was one of his earlier covers for the company...

bartl
06-15-2005, 01:17 PM
But, goofy or not, Neal pulls it off great. I think it was one of his earlier covers for the company...
Here are the covers from ACTION during that period, to which I was referring:

Page One (http://www.milehighcomics.com/cgi-bin/backissue.cgi?action=list&title=01062288700&publisher=DC&snumber=101)
Page 2 (http://www.milehighcomics.com/cgi-bin/backissue.cgi?action=list&title=01062288700&publisher=DC&snumber=121)