View Full Version : CBR: Getting Lost with Judd Winick: Part 1
CBR News
03-29-2010, 12:58 PM
In the first of a two-part interview, Judd Winick shared details about his new Jason Todd projects: the six-issue miniseries "Red Hood: Lost Days" for DC Comics and the "Batman: Under the Red Hood" animated film.
Full article here (http://comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=25456).
Gabe De Los Muertos
03-29-2010, 01:03 PM
Winick just won major points with me. Good to know he has the book done. And I'm glad he likes Grant's version of Jason as well.
FailureByDesign
03-29-2010, 01:34 PM
He kept making a point of how Jason is a "bad guy", almost feels like he is preparing us for something. I just hope it isn't anything similar to BFTC "bad guy", he works best as an anti-hero.
taintedshimmer
03-29-2010, 01:48 PM
Winick's Jason is everything he should be. A snarky street kid, a manic robin and a lethal vigilante who can challenge Batman's moral issues by appealing to the paternal feelings Bruce has for his adopted son and the loss there of. There's a moral issue, an emotional issue and plenty of snappy dialogue and broad concepts of vengeance, love, betrayal and social commentary. Screw Harvey Dent, I Believe that Gotham needs a lethal vigilante to toe the line and a Batman to keep him in check.
I'm really glad it was Johns he namechecked: he did the best job with Jason apart from Winick himself. I don't mind Morrisons so much either, actually, he could be a lot worse. Just not keen on the aesthetic choices. As long as Winick keeps to him being a antihero and small case letters bad guy who kills when he deems it appropriate (aka not a child), then I am a happy fan. I enjoy Jason causing shit for people, as long as he's written right and I understand the motivations and that motivation isn't just taking Winick's "he's a bad guy" to an extreme. He's a bad guy, he's not an arkhamite psycho.
Bloody brilliant looking for the DVD and miniseries though, I can't wait for it.
Kiryu
03-29-2010, 01:50 PM
I enjoy Jason causing shit for people, as long as he's written right and I understand the motivations and that motivation isn't just taking Winick's "he's a bad guy" to an extreme. He's a bad guy, he's not an arkhamite psycho.
Bloody brilliant looking for the DVD and miniseries though, I can't wait for it.
I dunno, Winick himself wrote Jason running around with a duffle bag full of severed heads from criminals he'd killed.
Pretty psychotic.
TonyStark1012
03-29-2010, 01:52 PM
Winick's Jason is everything he should be. A snarky street kid, a manic robin and a lethal vigilante who can challenge Batman's moral issues by appealing to the paternal feelings Bruce has for his adopted son and the loss there of. There's a moral issue, an emotional issue and plenty of snappy dialogue and broad concepts of vengeance, love, betrayal and social commentary. Screw Harvey Dent, I believe Gotham needs a lethal vigiante to toe the line and a Batman to keep him in check.
I'm really glad it was Johns he namechecked: he did the best job with Jason apart from Winick himself. I don't mind Morrisons so much either, actually, he could be a lot worse. Just not keen on the aesthetic choices. As long as Winick keeps to him being a antihero and small case letters bad guy who kills when he deems it appropriate (aka not a child), then I am a happy fan. I enjoy Jason causing shit for people, as long as he's written right and I understand the motivations and that motivation isn't just taking Winick's "he's a bad guy" to an extreme. He's a bad guy, he's not an arkhamite psycho.
Bloody brilliant looking for the DVD and miniseries though, I can't wait for it.
In 100% agreement with everything said here!
taintedshimmer
03-29-2010, 01:55 PM
I dunno, Winick himself wrote Jason running around with a duffle bag full of severed heads from criminals he'd killed.
Pretty psychotic.
There's a difference between lopping peoples heads off because they were born on the 2nd of the month or you want to make them laugh than chopping them off as a message to stop dealers from selling to children.
benicio127
03-29-2010, 02:27 PM
He kept making a point of how Jason is a "bad guy", almost feels like he is preparing us for something. I just hope it isn't anything similar to BFTC "bad guy", he works best as an anti-hero.
Hmm. Winick did use the term anti-hero repeatedly to describe Jason, so that's a plus.
Winick's Jason is everything he should be. A snarky street kid, a manic robin and a lethal vigilante who can challenge Batman's moral issues by appealing to the paternal feelings Bruce has for his adopted son and the loss there of. There's a moral issue, an emotional issue and plenty of snappy dialogue and broad concepts of vengeance, love, betrayal and social commentary. Screw Harvey Dent, I Believe that Gotham needs a lethal vigilante to toe the line and a Batman to keep him in check.
I'm really glad it was Johns he namechecked: he did the best job with Jason apart from Winick himself. I don't mind Morrisons so much either, actually, he could be a lot worse. Just not keen on the aesthetic choices. As long as Winick keeps to him being a antihero and small case letters bad guy who kills when he deems it appropriate (aka not a child), then I am a happy fan. I enjoy Jason causing shit for people, as long as he's written right and I understand the motivations and that motivation isn't just taking Winick's "he's a bad guy" to an extreme. He's a bad guy, he's not an arkhamite psycho.
Bloody brilliant looking for the DVD and miniseries though, I can't wait for it.
Exactly. I can't wait to see an explanation of why he uses the dagger he does. Hopefully we get that.
And Brian Azzarello writing Jason? That would be glorious.
Kryptofan1
03-29-2010, 02:32 PM
I have always liked Jason.
Jason wasn't troubled when we was first introduced. He was Dick Grayson 2.0.
Post Batman 400, with the COIE retcon, he became the angry street kid. Even then, he had his moments: e.g. his apparent murder of a crminal (rapist? definitely an abuser of women) and telling Batman "he fell". Sadly "angry Jason" lasted less than 3 years. Frank Miller had made it safe to kill Robin-just not "the real Robin".
I am glad that he is back. The only thing I don't like I about the resurrected Todd is the the Superboy punch. I blame DC for that, not Winnick. If he stays an anti-hero, I will definitely be along for the ride.
taintedshimmer
03-29-2010, 03:07 PM
Exactly. I can't wait to see an explanation of why he uses the dagger he does. Hopefully we get that.
I love the kris. I'd love to know.
kjc007
03-29-2010, 03:51 PM
Just to get off topic for a second. Did you guys notice that on the DVD cover for the Red Hood, there was a pic of Jonah Hex and that it looked like the Spectre Short did on JL: Crisis on Two- Earths.
Battyman
03-29-2010, 03:53 PM
I think the DVD has the possibility of being the best of the bunch, and finally a strait forward batman story. Jason's a great character, but I'm kinda partial since this was the 1st batman arc I recall buying since Knightfall.
Battyman
03-29-2010, 03:55 PM
Yeah a Jonah Hex short to boot, this should be great.
SJNeal
03-29-2010, 04:11 PM
Upon its announcement I decided to trade-wait this, but the interview has me pretty excited! I just may have to pick up the singles now...
Retro315
03-29-2010, 05:54 PM
A little unity of vision always impresses me - so Judd liking Morrison's update is pretty cool. I've hoped all along that we see Jason dying his hair at some point during Lost Days. (At any rate, Morrison is definitely a "writer's writer" so DC writers probably all tend to love what he brings.)
Anyway, Grant took "Jason wants to be a better vigilante than Batman" directly from Judd, and the love/hate with Grayson and hate/hate with Drake remained true (Including his meeting Damian and the tone of yet another Robin).
If Judd takes anything back from what Grant did, I hope it's that kind of embracing of the fact that Jason has now been "born" from both Batman & Robin, and the Joker. He owes his current incarnation to both of them. And it's sort of ingenious that he stole Joker's original identity because it's the PERFECT codename and costume design to reflect those origins.
Keehar
03-29-2010, 06:10 PM
Can't wait for this mini, or the DVD.
Battyman
03-29-2010, 07:30 PM
It would be cool to see him on the secret six team some time in the future.
TonyStark1012
03-29-2010, 07:38 PM
It would be cool to see him on the secret six team some time in the future.
That would be pretty freaking cool!:cool:
Godlike13
03-29-2010, 07:39 PM
"Remember that he's a bad guy. If there's ever some middle ground, don't forget, he's bad."
:cool: That i like. Todd's only good as bad IMO.
SpideyZERO
03-30-2010, 12:33 AM
I enjoy Under The Red Hood. Can't wait for this, and the dvd
Angelo2113
03-30-2010, 08:32 PM
A little unity of vision always impresses me - so Judd liking Morrison's update is pretty cool. I've hoped all along that we see Jason dying his hair at some point during Lost Days. (At any rate, Morrison is definitely a "writer's writer" so DC writers probably all tend to love what he brings.)
If Judd takes anything back from what Grant did, I hope it's that kind of embracing of the fact that Jason has now been "born" from both Batman & Robin, and the Joker. He owes his current incarnation to both of them. And it's sort of ingenious that he stole Joker's original identity because it's the PERFECT codename and costume design to reflect those origins.
I was actually also impressed that Judd Winick admitted that he liked how Grant Morrison handled Jason Todd. Not many writers, at least that I've read, have appreciated how other writers take their characters and use them.
I really hope that Judd Winick will give the philosophy on Jason's fascination of taking Joker's original criminal name, as his vigilante name, and still having Batman's urge to punish crime, and I really hope that Jason's first kill will be a major factor into that.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.