X-23 and X-Force

[ChrisLHanssen]

I got the Trade Paperback of X-Force Old Ghosts. I'm just wondering in the issue 10:

SPOILER
WARNING:


S



P



O



I



L



E




R

In Issue #10 X-23 (Laura Kinney) just had the Legacy Virus pumped inside her when one of the Smiley Troops punches her in the stomach and the vial of the virus enters her body and she gets infected. Then she runs to an vat of molten steel and then tries to jump in and kill herself so the virus does not infect others and anyone who wants to kill the remaining mutants. Then Joshua (Elixir) Foley runs after her. Elixir then pleads with Laura not to kill herself because he had so many other friends die and does not want to see another death take place. As Laura jumped into the vat Elixir he catches her in mid jump then an argument takes place then Elixir uses his powers in combination to Laura's mutant healing factor to burn the virus out of her system and he uses to much power then by accident lets her go do to exhaustion and she hits the edge of the vat and catches fire. Josh gave her his shirt to wear because her clothes were also burned. If her clothes got burned would her pants, underwear if she is wearing any), and her boots would she be bottomless and walking around barefoot? She is red as a beet and you see her wearing pants still. So can you concider this an error?

[Jess C.H.]

It almost sounds like someone wanted this scene to go alot further than mainstream comics will allow. I think you know that was'nt an oversight.

[worstblogever]

No prize moment-


Her upper half fell closer to the molten metal, and ignited first. She stop-drop-&-rolled before the flames caught all the way down to her pants.

See? Easy.

[Havok83]

she got that ability from Wolverine. His pants stayed on in the movie even though his body and shirt was being vaporized by Jean

[Grunty]

Josh gave her his shirt to wear because her clothes were also burned. If her clothes got burned would her pants, underwear if she is wearing any), and her boots would she be bottomless and walking around barefoot? She is red as a beet and you see her wearing pants still. So can you concider this an error?

For me it looked like Josh was in his undewear, since i think i saw his legs. which made me belive that he gave her his whole uniform.

On the other hand worstblogever's theory sounds even more plausible and explains how she could walk around without leaving behind stuck on pieces of skin from her feet.

[XaviersMisprint]

Yes, Josh gave her his pants and wore his underwear. After he had sex with her, sexually healing her burning rotting body.

[Personamanx]

Well it's canon that X-23 wears underwear.......

[Fatguy]

Can we consider this an error? Is this a serious thread?

Her vagina was not shown because this is a comic and having underage girls walking around with their hoo-ha's showing is generally considered bad form. Her pants remained on as artistic license. Just like no matter how large the Hulk becomes when he gets free from Banner, his pants remain on. So we arent subjected to his giant green balls flopping around.

[ChrisLHanssen]

For me it looked like Josh was in his undewear, since i think i saw his legs. which made me belive that he gave her his whole uniform.

On the other hand worstblogever's theory sounds even more plausible and explains how she could walk around without leaving behind stuck on pieces of skin from her feet.

Yes, Josh gave her his pants and wore his underwear. After he had sex with her, sexually healing her burning rotting body.

You both are correct. Just got out my issues and did see Josh wearing boxer briefs and was carrying his shoes over his shoulder on the Epilogue 2 where Vanisher teleports the team back to Angels house and is standing in front of Warren.

It almost sounds like someone wanted this scene to go alot further than mainstream comics will allow. I think you know that was'nt an oversight.

Hell why not? There is alot of blood spilled.

[The Big G]

Hell why not? There is alot of blood spilled.

Because America doesnt give a shit about violence....but sex...they care a big deal. And besides Disney owns Marvel now....

[FeminineMystique]

Because America doesnt give a shit about violence....but sex...they care a big deal. And besides Disney owns Marvel now....

To be fair, I don't remember the last time they had someone slices to ribbons in bloody fashion at Disney, but that doesn't stop X-Force being the most blood drenched book Marvel does:wink:

But yeah, Americans are funny that way. Graphic violence? Sure, fine. Graphic sex? BIG NO.:tongue:

[Azure]

Yeah, why can't comics contain images of child pornography :confused:

Stupid Disney. :mad: :mad: :evilangry:

[steve2275]

But yeah, Americans are funny that way. Graphic violence? Sure, fine. Graphic sex? BIG NO.:tongue:
im a fighter
not a lover

[SayOcean]

Yeah, why can't comics contain images of child pornography :confused:

Stupid Disney. :mad: :mad: :evilangry:yeah why cant we just show them dying and being blown up.....remember there was little to no child sex during the holocaust, but child violence???

Because America doesnt give a shit about violence....but sex...they care a big deal. And besides Disney owns Marvel now....yeah you should watch this movie is not yet rated....pretty go od on how americans get their movies rated


and if i was hot teenager or hot(ter) young person and risking my life....i wouldn't wear underwear...i mean it just seems kinda silly

[The Big G]

But yeah, Americans are funny that way. Graphic violence? Sure, fine. Graphic sex? BIG NO.:tongue:

We are kind strange like that arent we Myst :tongue: :tongue:

[ChrisLHanssen]

Excellent points here, people.