PatrickG
10-29-2009, 10:35 AM
Okay, I realize thread derailment happens. But I'm gonna start a separate thread 'cause what I have to say is a wee bit off from that.
Gail was talking how a fanfic writer accused her of "ripping off" a fanfic where Black Canary kissed Batman. Now, I don't think it would constitute "ripping off" even if Gail read fanfic, which she doesn't, because that's not a story premise; it's a story element. I recall people saying that there were people who felt ripped off at the premise of Nightstar, Dick Grayson and Starfire's daughter from Kingdom Come; personally, I think everybody saw the potential for that anybody could have independently come up with that; it's so obvious that, while perhaps fun, is not a concept anybody could cite as "original".
I have a history of "calling" certain things in a vacuum. I remember ranting like a crazy person in more than one comic shop as a teenager about how the Watcher's appearances with gloves vs. his appearances with no gloves were giant neon sign that he was being impersonated by Aron the Rogue Watcher during Defalco's FF run and I started saying it as soon as he showed up gloveless. I insisted in Zero Hour #4 (the first issue) that Extant was working for Parallax and blabbed constantly about the idea of Superman getting overcharged and becoming an energy being. I sincerely doubt any comics pro would have heard some kid's ramblings at the comic shop and run with any of this.
However, where things do get a bit hazy for me as to whether I was inspiring stories is when I started getting online, when I talked to creators and when I started actually pitching.
Joe Casey always had a habit of pitching stuff a few weeks after me that I'd likely chalk up to shared tastes. This includes The Intimates (announced a couple months after my super-hero school pitch to DC, not HUGELY original), an issue of Superman he did where Superman fights a comic book Superman brought to life (I pitched a variation on that to his editor a couple of months prior to the solicit, slightly different emotional hook) and even had a werewolves-on-the-moon steampunk thing floating around. This is surely just shared tastes.
At my first con, I remember everyone at the DC booth staring at me when I said that Hal Jordan should come back as the Spectre. They seemed to lose interest when I added that I found that was a bad fit and suggested that what I thought would fit better would be Hal Jordan: Firestorm (his body WAS in the sun) or even just plain Hal Jordan, a powerless man in deep space written as a space western about redemption, casting Jordan as a guilty hearted, two-fisted badass who has to deal with a lawless universe devoid of a Green Lantern Corps and the anarchy he'd created.
I remember having conversations with John Ostrander about how weird it was for the Crimson Avenger to be the DCU's official "first super-hero" and the void that having no 1938 Superman created and he wrote the short story where it established the Crimson Avenger had prophetic visions of Superman dying and was "avenging" Superman all along. Not quite what I would have done but, hey! I like to think our conversations inspired it.
Likewise, I was pitching Club of Heroes stuff to then Batman editor Matt Idelsen and discussed the pitch in front of Grant Morrison and proceeded to discuss it WITH Morrison, even mentioning that I'd lump in Chief Man of Bats and that I thought financier John Mayhew had sinister potential. This was... 2004? 2005?
I flat out suggested that I found aging Johnny Thunder to be depressing and that I thought he should become the new Thunderbolt, suggested that it could be established as a rule about having a genie in the DCU that you take their place when you die. I remember everyone seemed skeptical but it happened in print.
These are the minor cases, I'll be back with the bigger cases later. Anybody encountered this? I found people were more willing to listen to me because I even said I had no intention of suing if they listened. I said then and continue to believe that having one idea or ten ideas or a hundred ideas doesn't make you a writer or an artist or a creator but the true test is the ability to come up with more ideas on command. So, for me, no one idea would constitute something I would pick a fight over... But sometimes I do start to wonder if I've been too loose lipped or maybe even been used as an idea farm. Like I say, more later...
In the meantime, anybody else have this experience?
Gail was talking how a fanfic writer accused her of "ripping off" a fanfic where Black Canary kissed Batman. Now, I don't think it would constitute "ripping off" even if Gail read fanfic, which she doesn't, because that's not a story premise; it's a story element. I recall people saying that there were people who felt ripped off at the premise of Nightstar, Dick Grayson and Starfire's daughter from Kingdom Come; personally, I think everybody saw the potential for that anybody could have independently come up with that; it's so obvious that, while perhaps fun, is not a concept anybody could cite as "original".
I have a history of "calling" certain things in a vacuum. I remember ranting like a crazy person in more than one comic shop as a teenager about how the Watcher's appearances with gloves vs. his appearances with no gloves were giant neon sign that he was being impersonated by Aron the Rogue Watcher during Defalco's FF run and I started saying it as soon as he showed up gloveless. I insisted in Zero Hour #4 (the first issue) that Extant was working for Parallax and blabbed constantly about the idea of Superman getting overcharged and becoming an energy being. I sincerely doubt any comics pro would have heard some kid's ramblings at the comic shop and run with any of this.
However, where things do get a bit hazy for me as to whether I was inspiring stories is when I started getting online, when I talked to creators and when I started actually pitching.
Joe Casey always had a habit of pitching stuff a few weeks after me that I'd likely chalk up to shared tastes. This includes The Intimates (announced a couple months after my super-hero school pitch to DC, not HUGELY original), an issue of Superman he did where Superman fights a comic book Superman brought to life (I pitched a variation on that to his editor a couple of months prior to the solicit, slightly different emotional hook) and even had a werewolves-on-the-moon steampunk thing floating around. This is surely just shared tastes.
At my first con, I remember everyone at the DC booth staring at me when I said that Hal Jordan should come back as the Spectre. They seemed to lose interest when I added that I found that was a bad fit and suggested that what I thought would fit better would be Hal Jordan: Firestorm (his body WAS in the sun) or even just plain Hal Jordan, a powerless man in deep space written as a space western about redemption, casting Jordan as a guilty hearted, two-fisted badass who has to deal with a lawless universe devoid of a Green Lantern Corps and the anarchy he'd created.
I remember having conversations with John Ostrander about how weird it was for the Crimson Avenger to be the DCU's official "first super-hero" and the void that having no 1938 Superman created and he wrote the short story where it established the Crimson Avenger had prophetic visions of Superman dying and was "avenging" Superman all along. Not quite what I would have done but, hey! I like to think our conversations inspired it.
Likewise, I was pitching Club of Heroes stuff to then Batman editor Matt Idelsen and discussed the pitch in front of Grant Morrison and proceeded to discuss it WITH Morrison, even mentioning that I'd lump in Chief Man of Bats and that I thought financier John Mayhew had sinister potential. This was... 2004? 2005?
I flat out suggested that I found aging Johnny Thunder to be depressing and that I thought he should become the new Thunderbolt, suggested that it could be established as a rule about having a genie in the DCU that you take their place when you die. I remember everyone seemed skeptical but it happened in print.
These are the minor cases, I'll be back with the bigger cases later. Anybody encountered this? I found people were more willing to listen to me because I even said I had no intention of suing if they listened. I said then and continue to believe that having one idea or ten ideas or a hundred ideas doesn't make you a writer or an artist or a creator but the true test is the ability to come up with more ideas on command. So, for me, no one idea would constitute something I would pick a fight over... But sometimes I do start to wonder if I've been too loose lipped or maybe even been used as an idea farm. Like I say, more later...
In the meantime, anybody else have this experience?