PDA

View Full Version : Didio discusses DC's legacy characters (From 10 Answers & One Question)


Will.S
10-19-2009, 09:58 PM
I thought his answers to these questions regarding DC's legacy characters were interesting and would be of interest to fans of those particular characters:

9) Fat Asteroid wrote:
How does DC view characters like Kyle, Wally and Connor now that you've returned their previous roles to "iconic" status?

DiDio: Well, Kyle’s still going to be very prominent in Green Lantern Corps. Wally, we’ve already announced the fact that he’ll have a second feature in The Flash. It shows us that he’ll be very active in the DCU still. And Connor, again, in the post-Blackest Night DCU, I’m sure he’ll have a place.

Nrama: I'm going to follow this up with a last question that is somewhat related...

10) Dietel wrote:
What is your opinion on characters growing up in the DCU? Dick Grayson has grown from a young Robin to Batman, Tim Drake has moved up to Red Robin, the former Teen Titans became Titans and are now in James Robinson's Justice League. How do you let characters grow and age without overshadowing or replacing main characters? Will we eventually see characters like Tim, Conner, Bart, and Cassandra growing into their own heroes? How do you approach this?

DiDio: Well, in the new year, we’re going to be addressing the topic of legacies in a story because there are two problems that we are faced with, in the DCU, I think. One is that you’ve got a situation where Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman really didn’t age as a lot of characters aged around them. So we had to keep on revising continuity in order for those guys to fit in properly, based upon how well other characters were growing older around them. We’re hopefully resolving that situation right now and into the new year by being able to be much clearer of where everybody was introduced and more importantly, how each character relates to each other in regards to agewise and who they basically grew up with.

The second thing is that we also entered in to a period of time into the, I would say middle of the ‘90s up until a few years ago, where a lot of characters were aging very rapidly. A lot of characters were being replaced. Their replacements were coming in as younger versions, then younger versions were added in on top of that. So we added many layers on to our characters in that particular period of time.

And right now, we’re just trying to straighten that out a little bit more so there’s a much clearer sense of what a legacy character is, what the relationship with the legacy character was, and more importantly, just a sense of how long each character was active, so we have a better sense of what they’re all about. Naturally, time compresses because you’re taking 70 years’ worth of continuity and trying to [inaudible] it into a person whose life is 30 years old. So that gets a little difficult.

But we’re trying to unravel that and give a clearer sensibility to what everybody’s time line is, and then more importantly, maintaining very cleanly going ahead, so that way, we don’t have that same sense of characters aging faster than others. OK?

Nrama: Yeah. You said "in the new year" that you’ll be "addressing legacies in a story." So is this just something that's taking place in one or more current ongoing series featuring legacy characters?

DiDio: That’s a really good question, Vaneta.

Nrama: When I heard you say "story," I start assuming there's going to be a special, separate story that specifically addresses legacies and features some of these characters you've mentioned. Would that be a more accurate assumption?

DiDio: Two very good questions, Vaneta. Great. I love it. It’s a shame none of the fans asked them, because then I would be able to answer them. But since you asked them, unfortunately, I have to move on to the next question.http://www.newsarama.com/comics/091019-Didio-10-Questions.html

I'm not sure that relegating them to back ups, team books, and saying that he's "sure he'll have a place" is exactly the right answer I want to hear with these characters but if there is a planned book for them that addresses the whole legacy aspect and how that's been going these days then I'd be interested in reading it.

Ilash
10-20-2009, 05:26 AM
They're not really trying to make sense of time in the DCU are they?

Oy, this will not end well.

Karl O'Neill
10-20-2009, 07:40 AM
I'm not sure that relegating them to back ups, team books, and saying that he's "sure he'll have a place" is exactly the right answer I want to hear with these characters but if there is a planned book for them that addresses the whole legacy aspect and how that's been going these days then I'd be interested in reading it.

How can he win then? Or ever please everybody?

What if he put Hal, Barry and Ollie to the back up's instead? Would that please everybody?

I personally think Kyle never had so good. He is being written very well in GLC and is very important to that title.

n8twing
10-20-2009, 11:24 AM
<<The second thing is that we also entered in to a period of time into the, I would say middle of the ‘90s up until a few years ago, where a lot of characters were aging very rapidly. A lot of characters were being replaced. Their replacements were coming in as younger versions, then younger versions were added in on top of that. So we added many layers on to our characters in that particular period of time.>>

Yeah, this from the guy who aged the entire DC Universe a full year for a bunch of pointless OYL reboots.

And aside from Oliver Queen and Hal Jordan in the 90s, I don't recall any DC characters being rapidly aged. And the "replacing" of characters (Kyle, Conner, The Reign of Supermen, Knightfall) didnt do anything to age anyone.

Also, this from the guy who has replaced a slew of characters (Jason-Firestorm, Choi-Atom, JasonTodd-Nightwing, Dick-Batman, Steph-Robin, Damien-Robin, Tim-RedRobin, Donna-WonderWoman, Bart-Flash, fakeAquaman, Renee-Question, Holly-Catwoman... shall I go on?)

Also, this from the guy who has rapidly aged the Young Justice characters under his watch. I mean, during the whole run of YOUNG JUSTICE, the kids were 15-16 years old. Now, Conner and Cassie must be approaching college age... which in turn ages EVERYONE.

And please, PLEASE, Didio, do NOT try to "explain" and "magically de-age" anyone.

Forth World
10-20-2009, 12:52 PM
They're not really trying to make sense of time in the DCU are they?

I hope not. That's how they got into this mess.

Also, this from the guy who has rapidly aged the Young Justice characters under his watch. I mean, during the whole run of YOUNG JUSTICE, the kids were 15-16 years old. Now, Conner and Cassie must be approaching college age... which in turn ages EVERYONE.

Why does it have to? I think rigid continuity has been one of the things hampering DC over the years. Looser is good.

Also, this from the guy who has replaced a slew of characters (Jason-Firestorm, Choi-Atom, JasonTodd-Nightwing, Dick-Batman, Steph-Robin, Damien-Robin, Tim-RedRobin, Donna-WonderWoman, Bart-Flash, fakeAquaman, Renee-Question, Holly-Catwoman... shall I go on?)

And how they ripped out Billy Batson's eye and skull-made-love-to him? Ook.

n8twing
10-20-2009, 01:18 PM
Why does it have to? I think rigid continuity has been one of the things hampering DC over the years. Looser is good.


Because when Tim Drake graduates college and begins working, that ages Dick Grayson, which ages Batman..... or, do you think at some point it'd be OK if Tim and Bruce appeared to be the same age?

I'm not one for rigid continuity, but there has to be a sense of continuity.

My less-than-subtle point is that Dan Didio should be the last one to chide past editorial regimes as being narrow-minded or short-sighted.

Forth World
10-20-2009, 01:26 PM
My less-than-subtle point is that Dan Didio should be the last one to chide past editorial regimes as being narrow-minded or short-sighted.

I think we can all stand in firm agreement on that point. :cool:

Guicho
10-20-2009, 03:00 PM
The answer is simple, Robin (Grayson) evolves so much he will go back in time and become the Bat that flies in threw Bruce Wayne's window.

What, that doesn't explain anything or make any sense ?
Neither will the explanation they give.

ScottyQuick
10-20-2009, 03:37 PM
Oh, that's too bad.

numberONE
10-20-2009, 03:43 PM
I for one, enjoy continuity and wish characters aged consistently.

Will.S
10-20-2009, 04:06 PM
How can he win then? Or ever please everybody?

What if he put Hal, Barry and Ollie to the back up's instead? Would that please everybody?

I personally think Kyle never had so good. He is being written very well in GLC and is very important to that title.
No, I wouldn't want Hal, Barry and Ollie in back ups either. I only like those characters to various degrees but since they've been brought back from the death I don't think putting them in back ups is a great way to keep them around.

I would prefer it if Kyle, Wally or Connor got their own titles again (or mini series in the case of Connor, hell make him share the book with GA) rather than see them put on the back burner although the jury's still out on Wally's involvement in Flash. And the thing with Kyle is that while he's written well in GLC, he shares the book with a bunch of other GL's so he's not really a driving force on the book like Hal is on his own title since it's a team book. Although lately Hal's been sharing the book a bit more with John who I'd like to see more of myself but I'd keep him on JLA.