PDA

View Full Version : If not Stark or Osborn, then who?


Ryan W
09-18-2009, 11:50 AM
When all of this 'Dark Reign' business is said and done, it's more than likely that neither Stark nor Osborn will be in control of a global peace-keeping agency or the 50 State Initiative.

With this in mind, who should be put in place as Director of whatever agency comes up next?


Nick Fury?
He's got the chops, obviously, but would the President or anyone else trust him again--and would he even want the job?

Sharon Carter?
She was interim Director of SHIELD for a while and did a fine job, but with everything that's happened to her recently is she really cut out for a long-term position such as this?

Steve Rogers?
Perhaps his place in the new Marvel Universe isn't as Captain America, but as the new Nick-Furyesque character watching over all of the heroes?

Henry Peter Gyrich?
He's dealt with super-powered people for years and has often had positions of power, but are his temper and a negative attitude towards most things superhuman really a good fit?

Jimmy Woo?
Is the leader of ATLAS ready to step into the lime-light and take his place alongside the mainstream Marvel heroes?

Natasha Romanov?
Is the Black Widow better suited for military stratagem than espionage, or is she more of a loner than a leader?

. . . Someone else?
Carol Danvers? Baron Zemo? Dum-Dum Dugan? James Rhodes? Elektra Natchios? Who would be your ideal candidate and why?

o1pickleboy
09-18-2009, 11:55 AM
U S Agent. the perfect government lackey.

Syrant
09-18-2009, 12:11 PM
Damn, this is a hard one.

I just throw in Ms. Victoria Hand. I've been hoping there's more to her.

Fatguy
09-18-2009, 12:14 PM
Steve Rodgers is an interesting idea.

It'll end up being Nick Fury eventually, though.

Jmacq1
09-18-2009, 12:16 PM
Steve Rogers as the head of SHIELD/What-have-you is something fans have rumbled about for years.

Personally I like the idea simply because it gives Steve a very up-front and meaningful role in the Marvel Universe, while still allowing Bucky to Captain America for a while longer.

Drdmx
09-18-2009, 12:24 PM
Steve is an interesting idea indeed.

Whats current events like for Agent Brand or Agent Hill?

XPac
09-18-2009, 12:27 PM
I think Nick Fury is the best choice.

Steve is a guy that I would trust to run things. But honestly, I Do think sometimes the world functions better when you a guy that's willing to cross certain lines to get the job done. Cap won't do that... and I respect the hell out of him because of it. But I can't help but think a guy that Nick Fury will ultimately serve the greater good a little bit better.

Jmacq1
09-18-2009, 12:42 PM
I think Nick Fury is the best choice.

Steve is a guy that I would trust to run things. But honestly, I Do think sometimes the world functions better when you a guy that's willing to cross certain lines to get the job done. Cap won't do that... and I respect the hell out of him because of it. But I can't help but think a guy that Nick Fury will ultimately serve the greater good a little bit better.

Well, I think it'd work best if SHIELD and the Initiative were broken into separate implements. You put Steve at the head of the Initiative and let SHIELD (and maybe the Shadow Initiative/Thunderbolts) do the covert ops and "dirty" stuff and let Fury head that up.

XPac
09-18-2009, 12:46 PM
Well, I think it'd work best if SHIELD and the Initiative were broken into separate implements. You put Steve at the head of the Initiative and let SHIELD (and maybe the Shadow Initiative/Thunderbolts) do the covert ops and "dirty" stuff and let Fury head that up.

That's a good point.

I think Steve in theory could run the Initiaive just fine. Training metahumans and preparing them to be heroes is probably something Cap would be very good at. Caps not a spy, but he's a great superhero. And the Iniative in theory should be more about one than the other.

If we're talking purely the Iniative, I think the best person might be Xavier. He probably has more experience training people to become heroes than anyone. It's just that he tends to focus exclusively on mutants.

CyberCoyote
09-18-2009, 01:00 PM
Going with Steve. At first I thought that he'd be too sidetracked by his own agendas and adventures, then I realized this is the Marvel Universe so any character can appear in as many places as Madrox without so much of as an eyebrow raise :)

No one can command more respect than Cap.

docholliday504
09-18-2009, 01:08 PM
I think Reed RIchards should be a selection.

But overall I guess I think Nick Fury should do it. He's the most brilliant tactical mind in the MArvel Universe. We need a non-costume to keep all the fruity costumes in line.

BigMike20X6
09-18-2009, 01:21 PM
Irving Forbush

durty dee
09-18-2009, 03:07 PM
It should be Tony Stark again.

Monty_Cristo
09-18-2009, 03:54 PM
Victoria for the win. i like her as a new thorn in the heroes side. Gyrich can be her # 2.

gforguava
09-18-2009, 03:55 PM
Zemo, preferably after kicking the ever living crap out of Osborn.

Monty_Cristo
09-18-2009, 04:23 PM
Zemo, preferably after kicking the ever living crap out of Osborn.

that would be a public relations nightmare.

gforguava
09-18-2009, 04:24 PM
that would be a public relations nightmare. Of course it would, but a man can dream. :biggrin:

XPac
09-18-2009, 04:57 PM
that would be a public relations nightmare.

He could always just pretend to be Citizen V again.

They fall for that everytime.

Monty_Cristo
09-18-2009, 05:12 PM
He could always just pretend to be Citizen V again.

They fall for that everytime.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,.....Dark Reign.

Trey
09-18-2009, 07:56 PM
Going with Steve. At first I thought that he'd be too sidetracked by his own agendas and adventures, then I realized this is the Marvel Universe so any character can appear in as many places as Madrox without so much of as an eyebrow raise :)

No one can command more respect than Cap.

That's my vote too.

Or just simply dismantle the organization and return the heroes to thier secret identity/vigilante roots. I don't really enjoy stories with heroes working for the military/government.

jackolover
09-18-2009, 08:22 PM
The old Cube's, The Warden. Read this CW YA/Runaways mini and see what this guy is like. If Hill had disappeared during CW, I could see Warden taking over, no trouble. The government wouldn't mess around. Gyrich is on the outer, and the Warden has some serious versatility, and who has no love for super humans, but can manipulate them very nicely indeed.

Monty_Cristo
09-18-2009, 08:26 PM
on another note, the original Human Torch is back. it only makes sense that he should take over administrative duties at Camp Hammond; offering training to young heroes who want it. Falcon can be one of his trainers. who better to get these kids into fighting trim than ol' Uncle Sam?

Omega Alpha
09-18-2009, 08:31 PM
No one. I think some time at least without government interference would be nice.

Jason Abbadon
09-19-2009, 03:44 AM
Bucky should lead a new SHIELD- he has the experience with the spy biz and dirty tricks.

Cap should lead the 50 state Initiave.

Iron Man should lead the Avengers US operations and Pym could handle global ops (most bad stuff happens in the US in the MU).


Or....

Rick Mason should lead a new SHIELD with carol Danvers and Maria Hill as sub-directors.
Because Rick Mason kicks major bootie.

worstblogever
09-19-2009, 03:49 AM
Who could multi-task something like this? Hmm...

I'll go for Vision, to give everyone that "big-brother" feeling.

monkeypie
09-19-2009, 11:49 AM
I reckon it might be rhodey. Didn't Brevort say in his blog that they were cancelling the War Machine series only because there were big plans afoot for Rhodey? I cant think of anything bigger, and i hope hes not just gonna end up pretending to be Iron Man again.

XPac
09-19-2009, 11:52 AM
Who could multi-task something like this? Hmm...

I'll go for Vision, to give everyone that "big-brother" feeling.

Given the fact that the old Vision pulled the big brother trick in the past, and given that the current one had Kangs brain pattern, I doubt that idea would get too much support.

Drdmx
09-19-2009, 12:05 PM
Given the fact that the old Vision pulled the big brother trick in the past, and given that the current one had Kangs brain pattern, I doubt that idea would get too much support.

I seem to remember him talking about being put in a position of power before... I believe it was when they were trying to decide on leadership for the Avengers Roster after Heroes Reborn. He had reservations because he had been posessed by.... Isaac(?) I believe.... So yeah, I've thought about him running things before, but he probably wouldnt work.

Hrist
09-19-2009, 02:56 PM
I think Nick Fury is the best choice.

Steve is a guy that I would trust to run things. But honestly, I Do think sometimes the world functions better when you a guy that's willing to cross certain lines to get the job done. Cap won't do that... and I respect the hell out of him because of it. But I can't help but think a guy that Nick Fury will ultimately serve the greater good a little bit better.

That's kind of why I want to see Steve in the job for a while-- it wouldn't be right for him, but it would an illuminating character experience.

Goshin
09-19-2009, 02:57 PM
Shortpack!

spiderman_rj
09-19-2009, 03:46 PM
Peter Parker, is the only choice " with great power comes great responsabilities"
nuff said

rbcsecruoser
09-19-2009, 03:56 PM
Peter Parker, is the only choice " with great power comes great responsabilities"
nuff said

Oh no, The Parker Luck would end the world!

Zero Hunter
09-19-2009, 04:08 PM
No one. I think some time at least without government interference would be nice.

I agree with this. No SHIELD. No HAMMER. No SWORD. Nothing. I think the world powers should look at just how easily a nutcase like Osborn has been able to basically became the real power in America beacuse of having the high tech personal army at his hands with what seems like absoluty no oversight. They should not restart anything until a time they can get more controls in place.

Plus SHIELD and HAMMER are just so overused anymore I am tired of seeing them.

Maestro
09-19-2009, 05:13 PM
why would Steve Rogers want be in charge? wasn't he, I don't know, sorta OPPOSED to the idea of registration??

Brother Justin Crowe
09-19-2009, 08:27 PM
William "Husker" Adama.

XPac
09-19-2009, 08:36 PM
why would Steve Rogers want be in charge? wasn't he, I don't know, sorta OPPOSED to the idea of registration??

He was oppossed to forced registration.

But I suppose if they tossed out the SHRA and made the whole thing optional, he'd be willing to run the thing.

I don't think he has a problem exactly with heroes working with or even for government (he does all the time). It's just the notion of it being mandetory.

Ryan W
09-19-2009, 09:14 PM
If he could restructure it his way and delegate his way, you just know Steve would be willing to do it.

@Monty: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice . . . Dark Reign." might have to be the new quote in my signature if you approve. :cool:

Jason Abbadon
09-20-2009, 12:37 AM
I reckon it might be rhodey. Didn't Brevort say in his blog that they were cancelling the War Machine series only because there were big plans afoot for Rhodey? I cant think of anything bigger, and i hope hes not just gonna end up pretending to be Iron Man again.
Hey now- that's not bad. Rhodey could lead a SHIELD kinda organization- particularly knowing what everyone's body count is and proceeding from there, instead of waiting for something to happen and then reacting to it (SHIELD's major failure was this defensive attitude).

spiderwire
09-20-2009, 02:12 AM
I think it's about time for a mutant to lead the ihitiative. Cyclops is a natural leader besides think of all the subplots. What will happen to the X-Men? How will he be recieved by the general public? How would HYDRA, AIM, or the Hand react? What would he do with the "dark" teams? Emma Frost? Vulcan returning to Earth? Professor X, Magneto, or even Sinister? All that and a bag of buffalo wing chips!

spiderwire
09-20-2009, 02:14 AM
I think it's about time for a mutant to lead the ihitiative. Cyclops is a natural leader besides think of all the subplots. What will happen to the X-Men? How will he be recieved by the general public? How would HYDRA, AIM, or the Hand react? What would he do with the "dark" teams? Emma Frost? Vulcan returning to Earth? Professor X, Magneto, or even Sinister? All that and a bag of buffalo wing chips!

Illmatik
09-20-2009, 02:41 AM
I think it's about time for a mutant to lead the ihitiative. Cyclops is a natural leader besides think of all the subplots. What will happen to the X-Men? How will he be recieved by the general public? How would HYDRA, AIM, or the Hand react? What would he do with the "dark" teams? Emma Frost? Vulcan returning to Earth? Professor X, Magneto, or even Sinister? All that and a bag of buffalo wing chips!

I agree, I would love to see Cyclops in a bigger role in the MU. It would definitely take the X-Men to a much-needed different direction

Weapon Ick
09-20-2009, 04:35 AM
Quick question: Where has Gyrich been during Dark Reign? Last I had seen him was when Stark forced him in to retirement. Seems like he would have a position waiting for him in Osborne's cabinet.

That Random Guy
09-20-2009, 05:14 AM
Quick question: Where has Gyrich been during Dark Reign? Last I had seen him was when Stark forced him in to retirement. Seems like he would have a position waiting for him in Osborne's cabinet.

Not sure where he has been but he will be in the new S.W.O.R.D series.

Mister Mets
09-20-2009, 10:36 AM
Steve Rogers or J Jonah Jameson, depending on whether you want it to be a good thing for the superheroes.

Omega Alpha
09-20-2009, 12:00 PM
I think it's about time for a mutant to lead the ihitiative. Cyclops is a natural leader besides think of all the subplots. What will happen to the X-Men? How will he be recieved by the general public? How would HYDRA, AIM, or the Hand react? What would he do with the "dark" teams? Emma Frost? Vulcan returning to Earth? Professor X, Magneto, or even Sinister? All that and a bag of buffalo wing chips!

I honestly don't see Cyclops interested. If anything, recent years have shown him that working with governments never works.

mikekerr3
09-20-2009, 12:04 PM
Steve Rogers or J Jonah Jameson, depending on whether you want it to be a good thing for the superheroes.

JJJ would actually be a better choice than most of the others, he at least is an honest loon, who would try to do the right thing.

passenger
09-20-2009, 04:56 PM
Steve Rogers,for the reasons cited by previous posters and because he would be the Initiative's conscience and moral compass,like he was for the Avengers.

BigMike20X6
09-22-2009, 12:36 PM
Obnoxio the Clown. He's due a comeback, and why not in a position of power?

http://i33.tinypic.com/25z1pvl.jpg

4sake
09-22-2009, 12:54 PM
Warbird
War Machine
Jimmy Woo
Steve Rogers

Sandy Hausler
09-22-2009, 12:58 PM
why would Steve Rogers want be in charge? wasn't he, I don't know, sorta OPPOSED to the idea of registration??

Exactly. The people who want Bucky to remain being Captain America think that is a position they can shunt Steve off to. But that dog won't hunt.

Sandy Hausler

Sandy Hausler
09-22-2009, 01:00 PM
Not sure where he has been but he will be in the new S.W.O.R.D series.

There's a new S.W.O.R.D. series? Bleh.

Sandy Hausler

Sandy Hausler
09-22-2009, 01:02 PM
JJJ would actually be a better choice than most of the others, he at least is an honest loon, who would try to do the right thing.

Uh, when has he been honest. Lying weasel and a coward as well. Makes me miss Guilianni.

Sandy Hausler

Nefarius
09-22-2009, 01:58 PM
No more SHIELD.As an organisation it failed miserably and turned into a tool for a nutjob like Osborn.Besides,bringing back Fury as Director of SHIELD would be restoring pre-Secret War status quo.But if they want to retain SHIELD,Steve Rogers would be great humanising from the inside the whole SHRA.

Monty_Cristo
09-22-2009, 01:59 PM
JJJ would actually be a better choice than most of the others, he at least is an honest loon, who would try to do the right thing.

like create the Scorpion?

Zembo
09-22-2009, 10:12 PM
Agent Brand. She can be a bit of a bastard, which you need, and she has powers so she can sympathize with the heroes. Her or Gyrich. You need someone who will be a hard-ass. He's a jerk, but a hardworking guy. No one who is a hero should be allowed, that would be a conflict of interest. The government should step in if needed where the capes can't police themselves.

Moose967
09-22-2009, 10:33 PM
Steve Rogers wouldn't take the role because he is a soldier who belongs on the front lines. Bucky will be Cap for probably one more arc....maybe....people need to just accept the fact that Bucky was always a temporary replacement.

Ryan W
09-24-2009, 11:54 PM
With his experience, Steve needs to step up from being a soldier and be the general he was meant to be.

nuclearman
09-25-2009, 12:34 AM
I'd like to see nick fury get back in charge.

Blind pugh
09-25-2009, 01:50 AM
I'm onboard with the Zemo proposal, he'll cross the lines people want Fury for, he's outwitted the Grandmaster so he's pretty smart & he'd help remind Marvel that the U.S president doesn't have sole power to choose the leadership of an international initiative.

Whitster
09-25-2009, 02:56 AM
he'd help remind Marvel that the U.S president doesn't have sole power to choose the leadership of an international initiative.

Based on this reasoning I vote Pete Wisdom, he has the espionage experiance and doesn't consider himself a "cape" so no real conflict of interests there, also his willing to cross the lines needed running an agency like this.

HAMMERs a US only agency though right?

Blind pugh
09-25-2009, 05:05 AM
HAMMERs a US only agency though right?
So far as I know H.A.M.M.E.R is but iirc it was the u.s pres that installed Stark as head of S.H.I.E.L.D, & on that note why no mention anywhere of the rest of the U.N contesting the S.H.I.E.L.D assets H.A.M.M.E.R's taken?

God those acronyms were tedious to type:smile:

Slumber Hulk
09-25-2009, 08:12 AM
I was tempted to say Steve but Fury needs back in!

CrimsonComedian
09-25-2009, 11:47 AM
Hellion of the x-men.

Iron Theurge
09-25-2009, 05:51 PM
Zemo, preferably after kicking the ever living crap out of Osborn.

Second this opinion.

Zembo
09-25-2009, 08:44 PM
Second this opinion.

And then things would be diffirent how? Still bad guy in charge. And he started the Thunderbolts, so it's not like he'd disband them. Hell, things would be worse cause he's not whacko.

InSovietRussia
09-25-2009, 08:46 PM
Galactus, or failing that, Deadpool. Imagine the crazy hijinks that would ensue! :biggrin:

tfresca
09-25-2009, 11:37 PM
Zemo really isn't a ad guy anymore. After Born Better, a good mini, he seemed intent on redeeming himself.

almozayaf
09-26-2009, 04:49 AM
what about deadpool

Tim Whitt
09-26-2009, 06:45 AM
I second Pete Wisdom.

Reed Richard's would be another good choice. Oh and what about Amadeus Cho hahaha.

Zero Hunter
09-26-2009, 10:45 AM
So far as I know H.A.M.M.E.R is but iirc it was the u.s pres that installed Stark as head of S.H.I.E.L.D, & on that note why no mention anywhere of the rest of the U.N contesting the S.H.I.E.L.D assets H.A.M.M.E.R's taken?

God those acronyms were tedious to type:smile:

Thats what has been driving me nuts about SHIELD for years now. Alot of current writers just act as if it is a just a branch of the US government like the CIA or FBI and totaly under their control. It was created by the UN not the US.

IllegalPAP
09-26-2009, 12:15 PM
I say WOO, just because then we'd have an AOA series again.

Blind pugh
09-26-2009, 03:28 PM
Thats what has been driving me nuts about SHIELD for years now. Alot of current writers just act as if it is a just a branch of the US government like the CIA or FBI and totaly under their control. It was created by the UN not the US.
I honestly thought I'd imagined that fact for awhile thank god the Knauffs at least remembered it.

Zero Hunter
09-26-2009, 05:01 PM
I think Marvel missed a great chance to show what the rest of the world thought about Osborn and his plans during this year of Dark Reign. It would have been cool to see countries like England and Canada and the like reacting to HAMMER and such.

Blind pugh
09-26-2009, 05:17 PM
I think Marvel missed a great chance to show what the rest of the world thought about Osborn and his plans during this year of Dark Reign. It would have been cool to see countries like England and Canada and the like reacting to HAMMER and such.
Couldn't agree more, we know lots of villains went North when registration was enacted did they start to return to the U.S once news about Osborn got out. How does their government feel about losing Weapon Omega etc.
lots of potential just from Canada.

Zero Hunter
09-26-2009, 06:07 PM
Especially after everything that went down with Secret Invasion. It would have been a perfect time for a new Alpha Flight team.

Minerboh
09-27-2009, 05:09 AM
I Have a feeling that Dr Doom's going to take charge of things. The follow up of Dark Reign is called ''the siege'' after all!

Blind pugh
09-27-2009, 09:34 AM
Especially after everything that went down with Secret Invasion. It would have been a perfect time for a new Alpha Flight team.
It's always a good time for Alpha Flight!

Avenger08
09-27-2009, 09:47 AM
I see only three possibilities.

Either Nick Fury, but i very much doubt that. However, everything was working for a while whilst he was in charge

Steve Rogers- Honestly, i kinda hope so. He comes back, redefines the initiative and makes everything better again.

Natalia Romanova- When she lead SHIELD for like half an hour, she was the most crazy good badass leader there could possibly be. She def has what it takes

DamonO
09-27-2009, 06:46 PM
James Rhodes

matthewaos
09-27-2009, 06:48 PM
I see only three possibilities.

Either Nick Fury, but i very much doubt that. However, everything was working for a while whilst he was in charge

Steve Rogers- Honestly, i kinda hope so. He comes back, redefines the initiative and makes everything better again.

Natalia Romanova- When she lead SHIELD for like half an hour, she was the most crazy good badass leader there could possibly be. She def has what it takes

I'm not sure they will let a russian to take over SHIELD

JurassicParkIsAnAwesomeMovie
09-27-2009, 06:57 PM
I want Nick Fury back as Director of SHIELD, but Steve Rogers would be cool, and that means that Bucky can still be Cap.

Sabrinaset
09-27-2009, 07:13 PM
The follow up of Dark Reign is called ''the siege'' after all!

Whoa, whoa, whoa ... I must have missed that! Links?

Sabrinaset
09-27-2009, 07:27 PM
Hmm ... I just looked it up and all I get is references to "The Siege of Asgard" .... I dunno that SHIELD is gonna play a big part in that!

matthewaos
09-27-2009, 07:28 PM
http://marvel.com/catalog/?id=13501

Sowhere it says (maybe not in this link) that it's an event six years in the making.

mikekerr3
09-27-2009, 11:43 PM
like create the Scorpion?

Even that's a step up from Osborn or Hill, he's a nut job but unlike the other two he is not malignantly evil

mikekerr3
09-27-2009, 11:45 PM
With his experience, Steve needs to step up from being a soldier and be the general he was meant to be.

There a long gap experience between being the soldier and front line leader that Cap has always been and the skills needed to be a general.

mikekerr3
09-27-2009, 11:48 PM
I'm not sure they will let a russian to take over SHIELD

Since Shield has always been UN, why not? The UN is far more likely to let a Russian run an agency that an American

matthewaos
09-28-2009, 07:20 AM
Since Shield has always been UN, why not? The UN is far more likely to let a Russian run an agency that an American

Yeah, but it's a comic book company based on the USA. During the cold war the russians were "bad communists", where in the real world both sides did their "bad" things.
And I was also reading an article somewhere (not comic related site) about Bucky, when he became cap. The article was refering to his brainwashed by russians days as "back when Russians were evil".

But either way, I would love to see her in that position.