PDA

View Full Version : Richard K. Morgan: british cyberpunk


Shellhead
09-02-2008, 11:54 AM
A while back, I complained here that cyberpunk seemed to have vanished as a genre. However, it seems that I just wasn't looking carefully enough, like maybe in the UK. For example, Ian McDonald has written a couple of great books that incorporated some cyberpunk themes and technology. John Courtney Grimwood wrote an excellent cyberpunk trilogy set in a big city in an alternate reality version of North Africa. And then there is Richard K. Morgan.

Some of my favorite cyberpunk works have some roots in hardboiled detective fiction along the lines of Raymond Chandler. Richard K. Morgan has written an impressive cyberpunk trilogy in that tradition, featuring a character named Takeshi Kovacs. I don't believe that the trilogy has a name, but the individual books are Altered Carbon, Broken Angels, and Woken Furies. Altered Carbon won the Philip K. Dick award, and is listed at imdb as in-development for a 2009 release.

Like the older hardboiled detective types, Kovacs is tough. Extremely tough. Each book features an intricate but solid plot with possibly a few too many characters in the first and third books. There is a lot of violence, but also a surprising level of introspection. Like all good hard-boiled detective stories, the hero is jaded, but still manages to encounter situations so appalling that they cause him to react with righteous outrage.

Morgan's writing is very good. He is economical with his use of language, like Roger Zelazny at the top of his form. There are some interesting science-fiction concepts, and they are explored with respect to some interesting ethical issues. The dialogue seems very natural, and the plot-driven writing is intertwined nicely with the motivations of the various characters.

Unlike most trilogies, it isn't essential to read these books in order. Each book takes place in a distinctive setting that is somewhat removed from the others, though the character development of Kovacs himself carries over from book to book. The best of the trilogy is Broken Angels, the second book, for taking cyberpunk to an unusual but exciting setting, no man's land in the middle of a planet-wide civil war. Oddly, the cast of Broken Angels is a smaller and more developed group than found in the other two books, but the lethality of the overall situation keeps the plot moving along at a brisk pace.

The other two books are well worth reading. The first book is an unusual murder mystery that play fairly. And the third book takes Kovacs back to his roots, to very literally confront his past mistakes. If you enjoy the writing of Philip K. Dick (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep), George R.R. Martin (Tuf Voyaging) and/or George Alec Effinger (When Gravity Fails), you should definitely give Richard K. Morgan a try.

Ryan Day
09-02-2008, 01:16 PM
I really enjoy Morgan's books, particularly Broken Angels - it's a great mix of detective, action, and science fiction genres.

His last one, Black Man (or Thirteen) is pretty good, too, similar to the Altered Carbon series - in fact, I believe it's a loose prequel. And I'm looking forward to his new book that comes out in the fall, which switches from SF to Fantasy.

Agent Helix
09-04-2008, 06:48 AM
He's fairly good, though I'd only really recommend Altered Carbon. Solid junky sci-fi, anyway, good for a plane ride or lunch break reading.

Libaax
09-04-2008, 11:15 AM
Shellhead Richard Morgan is one of my favorite authors. He is one of few modern SF i enjoy nearly as much my favorite old greats like PKD.


The reason i enjoy him so much is that as you mentioned he mix sf+noir so well. His Cyberpunk elements in his books are awesome.

I also like despite the action,sex,tough characters and dark worlds he has introspection.

Altered Carbon was amazing in that combining the hardcore sf+noir with issues that you dont see in action oriented sf.

Actually i thought Broken Angels was weaker than AC. There is a reason Altered Carbon has been listed a future classic sf book.

I hope the third Kovacs book is as good as AC and better than Broken Angels. Which wasnt bad but it lacked the egde of AC. The characters,story,issues was not as interesting.

Shellhead
09-04-2008, 05:44 PM
I was really impressed by the ideas in Broken Angels, like that chilling nanobes threat, or the revelations about that big artifact. It also benefited from a smaller cast with stronger characterization than either the first of third books. Plus the whole warzone setting was something I hadn't seen before in cyberpunk. The only weakpoint was that the team didn't bother using hazmat suits or the futuristic equivalent.

The third book, Woken Furies, is more like the first book than the third book, but it really forces Kovacs to face the implications of his past actions. The setting is his homeworld, Harlan's World, of which we just got an interesting glimpse of in Altered Carbon. Like Altered Carbon, Woken Furies would have been a better book with a slight reduction in plot twists and cast of characters. Even so, it was a great read with a brisk pace and powerful ending.

Libaax
09-05-2008, 05:57 AM
I enjoy the plot twists you lose the noir elements if its not enough plot twists.


About Broken Angles, it was interesting with the different setting, but the characters in team was boring compared to AC.

Thats really why i dont rate it higher.

Rik Levins
09-22-2008, 12:59 PM
The only weakpoint was that the team didn't bother using hazmat suits or the futuristic equivalent.

Well...to be fair, if I had the promise of being able to swap out my old, radiation-damaged body for a healthy new one, I probably wouldn't bother with the hassle of a hazmat suit either.
But yeah, I very much enjoyed the Kovacs books. On the other hand, I tried to get into Market Forces, but it just didn't interest me.

Have you read any of the Cassandra Kresnov novels, by Joel Shepherd?