PDA

View Full Version : Ebert & Roeper: no more.


Sean Walsh
07-21-2008, 01:54 PM
Yesterday, Richard Roeper announced he's not returning to AT THE MOVIES WITH EBERT & REOPER. Today, Roger Ebert - who's been out for over a year - is parting ways with the show too.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iCzFfPytoOOXHx1B_NZEHpVowmjAD922C3M00

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago Sun-Times film critic Roger Ebert says he's cutting ties with the television show that he and the late Gene Siskel made famous.

In an e-mail to The Associated Press on Monday, Ebert said Disney-ABC Domestic Television had decided to take the show "in a new direction" and he won't be associated with it.

His announcement came a day after Chicago Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper said he was leaving the nationally syndicated "At the Movies With Ebert & Roeper."

Roeper said in a statement Sunday that he had failed to agree on a contract extension with Disney-ABC Domestic Television so his last appearance on the show will air the weekend of Aug. 16-17.

"Several months ago, Disney offered to extend my contract, which expires at the conclusion of the 2007-08 season," Roeper said. "I opted to wait. Much transpired after that behind the scenes, but an agreement was never reached, and we are all moving on."

A message seeking comment was left for a spokeswoman for Disney-ABC Domestic Television early Monday.

Roeper said he intends to "proceed elsewhere ... as the co-host of a movie review show that honors the standards established by Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert more than 30 years ago."

"I will be free to share the details on that program in the near future," he said.

He also said he wishes Disney "the best of luck with their new show, whatever form it may take."

Roeper joined Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert on the show in 2000, after Ebert's original co-host, Chicago Tribune film critic Gene Siskel, died of a brain tumor in 1999.

Siskel and Ebert had begun reviewing movies on television together in 1975 on Chicago public broadcasting's WTTW, which eventually took their program national. The pair jumped to commercial television through the Tribune Co.'s TV syndication wing in 1982, switching to Disney in 1986.

Roeper was chosen from among a large group of contenders to be the permanent replacement for Siskel after his death.

Ebert has been sidelined the last two years because of health issues that have robbed him of his voice.

"Over the last two seasons, as Roger has bravely coped with his medical issues, I've continued the show with a number of guest co-hosts," Roeper said. "It's never been the same without Roger, but I'm proud of the work we've done and I'm grateful to all the co-hosts who stepped in — and to the viewers that stayed loyal to the show."


And this bit from the Chicago Tribune (found at AICN) today basically gives us all a unified hope that AT THE MOVIE dies immediately:

Industry sources said that Disney is contemplating a reinvention of the movie review show with more of a Hollywood focus, along the lines of CBS Television Distribution's "Entertainment Tonight."

titanfan
07-21-2008, 08:00 PM
The new focus sounds way more interesting than Ebert & Roeper to be honest. The only reason I ever watch them is for the movie previews and not for the reviews themselves. A show like that is outdated in a world where there are sites like rotten tomatoes.

Armless Penguin
07-21-2008, 08:08 PM
I disagree that another anonymous Entertainment Tonight rip-off is more interesting than one of the single TV shows dedicted solely to movie reviews. As much as Roeper is not necessarily one of my favorite critics, I hold an immense amount of respect for Roger Ebert and his writings, and I routinely visit his site to check out his reviews of any movies in which I have some particular interest. The show hasn't really been the same since he has been gone, with just Roeper and the guest critics, but I've still caught it a few times and appreciated some of its aspects. I think doing away with it is something quite disappointing, to be honest.

Cyke
07-21-2008, 09:30 PM
I've found the show to be much more engaging and intelligent than any Access Hollywood/Entertainment Tonight-type show. It's one thing to read a review on Rotten Tomatoes, it's another thing to have two critics argue the merits of a film (sometimes even when they BOTH agree) right then and there. I'd much prefer it if the show continued with either a rotating cast of critics, or two permanent hosts.

kalorama
07-21-2008, 09:35 PM
I thought they should have canceled it after Siskel died. I have nothing against Roeper, in fac I often found myself agreeing with him, but as a piece of TV entertainment, the show was never quite right with him and Ebert. I often got the impression that Ebert was treating Roeper like a film student in need of a cinematic education rather than an equal.

DrewTheXenocide
07-21-2008, 09:38 PM
Well, this sucks. Honestly, even with Ebert gone, I've grown a liking to some of the oft-returning guests, like A.O Scott or Micheal Phillips. There is no way news about celebrities is more entertaining than one critic making fun of the other for liking a certain movie.

ZT4
07-21-2008, 10:09 PM
There's metric tons of Siskel and Ebert/Ebert and Roper stuff on Youtube...they even hammered out time for Mask of The Phantasm...and crucified crap deservedly, that will never happen again

DrewTheXenocide
07-21-2008, 10:58 PM
Isn't there another movie review show with some old guy and another younger lady, that's usually kinda boring?

xarathos
07-22-2008, 12:21 AM
Seeing as how the movie industry is dying a slow death I don't think it matters. We'll all be forced to watch stuff on those horrible new televisions that make thing so clear people will look repulsive as we can see their very poors in their faces. Either that or we will have to watch them on them on these little computer things that we will be required by law to have depending on who is elected in November. :smile:

I really liked the old Siskel and Ebert show, but that was literally another century.. .and we had more stuff to watch back then.

JCAll
07-22-2008, 12:58 AM
There used to be a show on E! that did nothing but play trailers for upcomming movies. I believe it was canned for more Paris Hilton Coverage. Since then Ebert and Roeper was the only show that showed me what was actually playing in theaters. And now it's out the window for the same reasons.

It's times like this I say we just raz the human race and start from scratch.

Johnny_Luck
07-22-2008, 01:15 AM
The new focus sounds way more interesting than Ebert & Roeper to be honest. The only reason I ever watch them is for the movie previews and not for the reviews themselves. A show like that is outdated in a world where there are sites like rotten tomatoes.

Wow, Going from 2 people really well educated about movies, but are so snobby and high on themselves they cannot enjoy most stuff for what it is, to a website full of ignorant hacks, imho that kinda comes across as giant lose lose there.

The show wasn't really outdated, I mean I hated everything that came out of their mouths and how high on themselves they thought they were but they still made it worth my time more so than E will or going to tomatoes site.

I mean when Ebert bashes Legend of Zorror because of a floating pool table and says that it sucks because the villains fight with polo sticks, when they actually just play a game of polo, it kinda makes him look bad.

The only review I ever read or heard from him that I ever agreed with was Into the Blue with Alba/Walker/Ashley Scott/Caan

I think that the same set-up would be fine if they actually showed movies a majority of people cared about rather than trying to look like they are artsy by giving more foreign films credit than what most general americans watch and like.

There used to be a show on E! that did nothing but play trailers for upcomming movies. I believe it was canned for more Paris Hilton Coverage. Since then Ebert and Roeper was the only show that showed me what was actually playing in theaters. And now it's out the window for the same reasons.

It's times like this I say we just raz the human race and start from scratch.

Theres actually a show with a older grey haired man and a black haired female that does what Ebert and Roeper do, but they are a lot more annoying and cocky in how they view themselves and what are in the films.

ChrisIII
07-23-2008, 12:16 PM
^ Leonard Maltin and Joyce Kulhawik (Hot Ticket) ?

Ilash
07-23-2008, 03:23 PM
This is really a pity. I've recently been watching tons of their old reviews on the website and while none of the critics on this show strike me as being as knowledgeable and flat out entertaining as Mark Kermode, I usually enjoy the reviews very much.

Oddly, my favourite of them is probably Michael Phillips but either way, I think a show dedicated purely to reviews IS a good idea and it's a pity that they're screwing up the format.

LtMarvel
07-23-2008, 04:59 PM
One more show I watch comes to an end...

KenK
07-24-2008, 07:03 AM
^ Leonard Maltin and Joyce Kulhawik (Hot Ticket) ?

Yeah, that show sucked ass.

Dennis K
07-24-2008, 07:17 AM
I haven't watched that show in a long time, and the whole "thumbs up/thumbs down" thing bothers me, but saying all that I'm still kind of sad to see the show (in the original concept) go away.

Iron Maiden
07-24-2008, 09:00 AM
I will be missing this show but to tell the truth didn't watch it much when Roeper came on board. When Siskel and Ebert were both doing the show, they would sometimes champion a movie that might otherwise be overlooked.

BTW there was a show called "Trailer Park" that used to just show trailers.

Bill Thompson
07-26-2008, 08:58 AM
It's just being transfered to a new venue, probably under a different name. Ebert has said that he and Roeper have been in talks about doing this for a long time because they didn't like the direction their show was taking. However they still want to do the show in the same format, and they will, only on a different network, or in a different medium.

DLFerguson
07-27-2008, 09:39 AM
Isn't there another movie review show with some old guy and another younger lady, that's usually kinda boring?

I think you're talking about the show with Jeffrey Lyons and Alison Bailes (who jumped from The Independent Film Channel to do this show)