PDA

View Full Version : a theory about page-turners


Shellhead
07-14-2008, 08:02 AM
Yesterday, I read a trashy paperback crime thriller, as fast as I could. The book was "The Guilty" by Jason Pinter. It wasn't a particularly good book. The writing was pedestrian. The plot was somewhat predictable. The characters were shallow and somewhat unrealistic. But it was a page-turner, and I couldn't stop reading. As I ended each chapter, I would briefly consider setting the book aside and getting back to it later, then go ahead and read the next chapter anyway. I did take a break mid-book to run some errands, then came home and finished it off.

What is it about these page-turners that makes them so hard to put down? There is definitely an exciting enough plot that moves forward at a good pace, but that can't be the only reason. My theory is that these books tend to make for fast reading because they have so many familiar elements that immersion is easy.

Specifically, there are a lot of cliches in your average page-turner. The setting tends to be modern and familiar, a well-known American city or maybe the suburbs. The characters are shallow enough that you can get to know them quickly, but have a few familiar quirks shared by either the reader or someone the reader knows. But the cliches really seal the deal, enabling the reader to glide through the plot without pause for reflection. A more challenging read might knock the typical reader out of the story, slowing the momentum of the reading.

hawkeye comeback
07-14-2008, 08:27 AM
I think you hit the nail on the head the reader cant question whats going on they just gotta go with it

Roquefort Raider
07-15-2008, 05:04 AM
Specifically, there are a lot of cliches in your average page-turner.

Sounds reasonable.

I hated "The Da Vinci Code" and got angry at the author every ten pages or so for being so predictable or for relying on PIS, but I admit it was a page turner. It could very well be because nothing in there was new, it was all stuff we had seen previously in higher-brow books like Foucault's pendulum or in pop culture gems like Preacher. But as you suggest, familiarity may breed interest instead of contempt!

Likewise with the Harry Potter series... I didn't dislike it, but saw zero originality in it. However, it was a very... let's say "comfortable" series, probably because it used so many clichés and familiar sets. A bit like walking on the bridge of the Enterprise or taking a walk in Tarzan's jungle. We know early on what the rules are. And all the books were page turners!

Matthew E
07-15-2008, 06:19 AM
But there has to be some spark of originality there, doesn't there? For me, if there isn't, if there's no snap or spin at all on the storytelling, it's just not going to grab me. I've given up on such books early before and I'll do it again.

Libaax
07-16-2008, 02:32 PM
For me i dont have page turners often. The only ones that i cant stop reading are original in some way or it has a spark that keeps you going.

I dont remember reading a cliche book,with boring characters etc as page turner.

Only my greatest favorit can make me read like crazy. Only the greatest crime writers,fantasy,SF etc


For example i read Da Vince code but not as a page turner. I struggled with it. I only finished slowly just to see how lame the end would be and it was worse than i thought.

I learned alot from that mistake....

sun tzu
07-16-2008, 02:45 PM
I think it's a bit of an overgeneralization. I don't think "Les Fourmis" by Bernard Werber was particularly full of clichés (or unoriginal!), but it hooked me from the start. Read the whole thing in one day.

Roquefort Raider
07-16-2008, 04:25 PM
Granted, the familiarity can't be all there is to it. There must be some élan, some drive, and also some semblance of coherence to the story.

But I think Shellhead's observation is surprisingly accurate.

The page-turners I remember from the top of my head include Steve Alten's Meg, Dan Simmons' Hyperion, Robert Ludlum's The Bourne supremacy, Brandon Ulysse's Octobre noir, George R. R. Martin's A game of thrones and Greg Rucka's Finder, and they're pretty much all over the place in terms of literary quality.

What I see in common in all of them is that they use familiar elements (in old-fashioned or new ways), use highly-colored characters, and are intensely plot-driven. Things happen in these books. The tension is certainly one of the things that keep us looking at the next page.

mattx110
07-16-2008, 07:05 PM
Those Harry Potter books are addictive.