PDA

View Full Version : The Women in Comics : Why are they Written so Bad ?


SUPERECWFAN1
07-08-2008, 07:14 AM
Its no shock many women aren't reading comics. And those who do must roll their eyes at how DC/Marvel treats them. Either their tortured , raped , made to look like fools , sluts or forced to be pregnet. There is no in between for most women in comics.

Both companies are at fault for this. And lets examine a couple of them.


DC Comics : Spoiler :

Spoiler really was Robin's girlfriend and someone he didn't want being a hero. But over time she managed to carve her own identity out. Fans took to Stephanie Brown since she was written as such a human character by Chuck Dixon and over the years even subbed for Robin at one time.

Then in 2004 DC decided to do the usual calling card that you see above. So she became :

A Fool.
Tortured to death.

She then was allowed to be killed off in such a lackluster turd way that it pissed many off. Chuck Dixon came back and in his run from #170-#174 brought Spoiler back and made it like she faked her death. Which pleased many fans.


Hawkgirl : From being Hawkman's partner to Roy Harper's bed buddy

Hawkgirl was always written well by Geoff Johns and others in the solo Hawkman title. For years she had gotten great treatment in JSA and took part in many of their biggest , toughest battles . Kendra had a daughter but it wasn't til Hawkman returned and saw her he claimed he had came back for his true love.

Kendra was a reincarnated Egyptian Princess who like Hawkman was reincarnated countless times over the decades . Their love was timeless and the 2 would meet , fall in love ect ect. Well this was a decent way to describe Hawkman's muddled origin .

Anyhow , back to Hawkgirl....after years DC decided to capitalize on the fact that Hawkgirl was in Justice League Unlimited. They revamped the 'Hawkman" series and made it "Hawkgirl" . They then started to change the whole destiny situation they had established.

It wasn't something fans were interested in. Hawkgirl died a quick death as a title and soon Kendra was placed in JLA. Its there she met Roy Harper. Panel time barely showed anything beyond him making a few flirting lines in battle and showing his daughter to her. Also to reflect that Kendra was a poor mother ...her daughter was killed "OFF PANEL". Also to reflect what a STUD Roy Harper was , Kendra became his woman ...being caught in a scene where as a male reader you were supposed to go BOOOYYYAAA you rock Roy Harper ! Way to score some ass.

Its very sad to see the Hawkgirl character done this way. Even as a member of JLA she's not so important and when she faces a bad guy , Roy yells about not hurting her or anything. Hard to believe this is a woman who was given her own title at one time. But its coming from DC. So she needs a powerful man to make him look good.


Mary-Jane Watson : Makes foolish deals with Satan !

Lets get this outta the way early....Marvel Comics does not like Mary-Jane Watson. You look at the past decades and you see a fan favorite character which wins most CBR Corries ect ect. As well as other fan awards for best supporting character and ask this..."why does Marvel not like her ?"

Because she is as popular as Peter Parker . And that pisses them off. They wanna sabatouge it somehow. They wanna make the character look as bad as possible and push Peter as a swinging single again and if MJ is there as his loving wife and ohhh so popular they can't. They are SCREWED.

So for 2 decades , fans of the character have seen her ...

Become Pregnet.
Die in a plane explosion.
Being held by a pyscho fan and possibly tortured for awhile.
And becoming a fool for making deals with the devil and sleeping with a character no one likes !

Is it any shock at this point many roll their eyes at the people in charge of Marvel Comics ? Why write a character so bad to make them look bad ? Is it some grand mission to put a female character in their place and make MJ not so important anymore to the Spiderman mythos ?

At this stage its kinda sad and silly really. Most companies would die to have a Mary-Jane Watson character thats so popular she inspires a title and has carried a Hollywood string of movies. Instead at Marvel this is considered a bad thing. She's a woman and she's hampering that swinging Peter Parker. BEST PUT HER IN HER PLACE !





In the end this is a few examples of badly written female characters. Its like the companies involved feel the characters should be treated as shit to prop the male characters up. And is it little shock that it doesn't inspire much female fans ?

valentine
07-08-2008, 07:25 AM
What.

Sorry, where are you drawing this assumption from? I'm having trouble with this one.

Corrina
07-08-2008, 07:33 AM
Super E, did you want to combine this with the "why do fanboys hate superheroines" thread? There's quite a good discussion there about the role of women in mainstream superhero comics.

Your Imaginary Pal
07-08-2008, 07:37 AM
"I'm not bad, I'm just written that way."

Agent Helix
07-08-2008, 07:41 AM
Because they're girls.

Duh.

SUPERECWFAN1
07-08-2008, 07:43 AM
Super E, did you want to combine this with the "why do fanboys hate superheroines" thread? There's quite a good discussion there about the role of women in mainstream superhero comics.


Sure....go ahead. I didn't notice that thread. I'm cool with posting it there.

MartinRedmond
07-08-2008, 09:15 AM
On the other hand, chicks are always right no matter what isn't any better. God help me, I had to watch a few episodes of Drake and Josh and I kind of wanted to see the Megan character get punched in the face. They seem to have this women abusers in kids show these days which I don't find really funny.

MJ being held by the psycho fan was kind of cool. Didn't she end up rescuing herself AND Peter? It was pretty surprising at the time. I'm sorry but Micheline's Spider-Man was just fun to read.

scout1279
07-08-2008, 09:43 AM
On the other hand, chicks are always right no matter what isn't any better. God help me, I had to watch a few episodes of Drake and Josh and I kind of wanted to see the Megan character get punched in the face. They seem to have this women abusers in kids show these days which I don't find really funny.

MJ being held by the psycho fan was kind of cool. Didn't she end up rescuing herself AND Peter? It was pretty surprising at the time. I'm sorry but Micheline's Spider-Man was just fun to read.

I didn't read the Micheline story you're talking about, but it sounds like an early DeMatteis story from right after the Spider-marriage.

Eliseu Gouveia
07-08-2008, 10:05 AM
IMHO, there are a few writers who can write women well, but they´re still in the minority.

I think it falls down on the editors, actualy.
they should be the ones to set the agenda for the company and who they hire for the job.

In this day and age, a writer who can´t write women well should go back to school.

Sorry for my bluntness.

K-DoG7p7
07-08-2008, 10:09 AM
Now about HAwkgirl.. Dwayne has been VERY good at showing both their strengths..
Everything from Roy's Moo Gi Gong skills to the fact that no matter what you do.. Hawkgirl just wont stay down :P

NickThompson
07-08-2008, 10:59 AM
Mary-Jane Watson : Makes foolish deals with Satan !

Lets get this outta the way early....Marvel Comics does not like Mary-Jane Watson. You look at the past decades and you see a fan favorite character which wins most CBR Corries ect ect. As well as other fan awards for best supporting character and ask this..."why does Marvel not like her ?"

Because she is as popular as Peter Parker . And that pisses them off. They wanna sabatouge it somehow. They wanna make the character look as bad as possible and push Peter as a swinging single again and if MJ is there as his loving wife and ohhh so popular they can't. They are SCREWED.

So for 2 decades , fans of the character have seen her ...

Become Pregnet.
Die in a plane explosion.
Being held by a pyscho fan and possibly tortured for awhile.
And becoming a fool for making deals with the devil and sleeping with a character no one likes !

Is it any shock at this point many roll their eyes at the people in charge of Marvel Comics ? Why write a character so bad to make them look bad ? Is it some grand mission to put a female character in their place and make MJ not so important anymore to the Spiderman mythos ?

At this stage its kinda sad and silly really. Most companies would die to have a Mary-Jane Watson character thats so popular she inspires a title and has carried a Hollywood string of movies. Instead at Marvel this is considered a bad thing. She's a woman and she's hampering that swinging Peter Parker. BEST PUT HER IN HER PLACE !


I was going to disagree but lets be honest, nothing is going to change your mind here. Despite you not knowing anyone at Marvel you know they all hate her and they hate her because she is a woman. Fine :)

Charles RB
07-08-2008, 11:01 AM
They're being written bad because you're reading bad comics.

titanfan
07-08-2008, 11:49 AM
The "Don't hurt my girl!" thing is bad writing on Roy, actually. This is a man who has dated Donna Troy, Cheshire, and Grace. (And grew up with Black Canary) He really shouldn't have an over protective gender stereotype.

The bad part about Kendra is that she's pissed at Roy, but being passive-aggressive about it. That's not really her style....

Then in 2004 DC decided to do the usual calling card that you see above. So she became :

A Fool.
Tortured to death.

The torture was gratuitous. On the other hand, Spoiler was always written as inexperienced. From that sense, it doesn't surprise me too much as to how she died. (Spunky, but ultimately failed) The outrage was how Leslie Thomkins magically changed character.

SUPERECWFAN1
07-08-2008, 12:03 PM
I was going to disagree but lets be honest, nothing is going to change your mind here. Despite you not knowing anyone at Marvel you know they all hate her and they hate her because she is a woman. Fine :)

They don't hate her for being a female. They hate her because her character has became such a huge thing in the comics , that when most say Mary-Jane Watson ...they assume "Peter Parker, Spiderman's wife". Ohhh how they wish they could change that.

It does make me laugh some to watch the steps made to really throw shit on her. To make her look bad.

Linkara
07-08-2008, 12:06 PM
Because a lot of men who write female characters write them as "women" first and characters second.

NickThompson
07-08-2008, 12:17 PM
Because a lot of men who write female characters write them as "women" first and characters second.
Hm, that's possible. Haven't noticed it, but I can believe it. Could also tie in to why female characters don't sell too.

Black Atom
07-08-2008, 12:22 PM
I'm not sure why Hawkgirl hooking up with Red arrow means she's written poorly. Also, isn't just as much of a "SCORE!" moment for her as it is for him?

And I don't think the sabotage of the Spider-marriage is anti-MJ specifically--they have been trying to get Pete single in a roundabout way for years. And no character in the Spider-books has been written worse than Peter himself; after all he selfishly made the pact with Mephisto that torpedoed his own marriage because he couldn't deal with the guilt of his Aunt dying. Again.

Spiffy
07-08-2008, 03:07 PM
I can think of a few others I've mentioned elsewhere recently. Sometimes the sexism is subtle.

-- Wonder Woman having to, as I see it, humble herself, to admit that Superman was right and she was wrong about Max Lord. Please note that I think the problem with this is more than her admitting fault. Certainly there are plenty of stories/situations where she should show/gain a bit of humility. What always bothered me was that it kind of came off as if Supes was the morally superior guy passing judgement on her, as opposed to her emotional conflict coming from inside herself. And this was the result of the writers putting her in this morally impossible, very manipulated, plot twist in the FIRST place. Sure, that's what writers DO, but this is a super-manipulated twist that didn't bring anything interesting to the character--all it did was knock her down.

-- Similarly, I thought it was really crass that Zatanna was given a similar treatment in Identity Crisis. In her case, what she did was easier to define as wrong, but there's still this element of a long-term setup, where a poweful female character was set up by a very manipulative plot twist to be lectured/humbled by a male colleague (in Z's case, swap in Batman for Superman).

I actually want to contrast this with some decent recent writing on She-Hulk in this department. She's been given a LOT of recent character angst, but overall I think under both Dan Slott and Peter David, there's been a clear message that SHE'S the source of her own occasional humbling, which is just fine. Her primary male "Super Associate" recently has been Iron Man, and although there have been scenes where we've definitely seen him try and cut her down, morally... he's failed. While she might have her own doubts, she hasn't been forced to capitulate the moral high ground to him--he hasn't humbled her successfully, even if he's tried.

Lester C.
07-08-2008, 03:28 PM
Women are written badly due to a combination of most of the writers being men writing to adults with sever cases of arrested development who might be a tad resentful what they can never have due to the fact that some of them are freaks.

Buzz Dixon
07-08-2008, 03:55 PM
One of the best bits of advice Mark Evanier ever gave to aspiring comics artists is that they shouldn't draw naked ladies until they had spent some time with one. He meant in life drawing classes, but I suppose other circumstances would count as well.

Ditto writers and editors: Spend some actual time with females.

No, trying to have sex with them doesn't count.

Agent_Torpor
07-08-2008, 04:34 PM
i've never been pleased with how Hawkgirl has degenerated into being solely Roy Harper's sexual conquest.

That character is due some respect.

hellokittykat
07-08-2008, 04:47 PM
I'm not sure why Hawkgirl hooking up with Red arrow means she's written poorly. Also, isn't just as much of a "SCORE!" moment for her as it is for him?

Not really. It goes back to the whole double edged sword thing about how when a guy gets laid he's a stud, while a woman is easy.

Also, the way it was written was such that Kendra was a conquest, and Roy, being the stallion that he is, wore her down.

The shame of it is, I could see how if it had been written the correct way-I mean, actually take the time to build a relationship before *blam* they're bangin'-that it could have worked as a story and been kinda cute.

mgs
07-08-2008, 05:02 PM
They're being written bad because you're reading bad comics.

exactly! ;)

Black Atom
07-08-2008, 05:34 PM
I can think of a few others I've mentioned elsewhere recently. Sometimes the sexism is subtle.

-- Wonder Woman having to, as I see it, humble herself, to admit that Superman was right and she was wrong about Max Lord. Please note that I think the problem with this is more than her admitting fault. Certainly there are plenty of stories/situations where she should show/gain a bit of humility. What always bothered me was that it kind of came off as if Supes was the morally superior guy passing judgement on her, as opposed to her emotional conflict coming from inside herself. And this was the result of the writers putting her in this morally impossible, very manipulated, plot twist in the FIRST place. Sure, that's what writers DO, but this is a super-manipulated twist that didn't bring anything interesting to the character--all it did was knock her down.

-- Similarly, I thought it was really crass that Zatanna was given a similar treatment in Identity Crisis. In her case, what she did was easier to define as wrong, but there's still this element of a long-term setup, where a poweful female character was set up by a very manipulative plot twist to be lectured/humbled by a male colleague (in Z's case, swap in Batman for Superman).


I thought the Zatanna bit was handled a little better. Members of the league tried to absolve her by saying she was pressured into performing the mind-wipings, but she declared it was her choice and took full responsibility, which I liked.