PDA

View Full Version : Venom movie?


Kablammo
02-05-2008, 09:57 PM
I could have sworn I heard/read somewhere that theres buzz about a Venom spin off from Spiderman 3. Has anyone else heard this or is there absolutely no truth to this rumor. Thanks

Shadow ES
02-05-2008, 10:06 PM
http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4249&Itemid=99

DeadXMan
02-05-2008, 10:08 PM
no


but they were gonna make one back in the days before the bankrupcy as an anti-hero with no ties to spidey.

I think the guy that did the crappy captain amrecia movie with the rubber ears. was on it


Edit* I stand corrected.

Sonicjuce
02-05-2008, 11:16 PM
I'm not even going to read your post just say, "Oh God Please no"

Spidey-kid1
02-06-2008, 06:18 AM
I could have sworn I heard/read somewhere that theres buzz about a Venom spin off from Spiderman 3. Has anyone else heard this or is there absolutely no truth to this rumor. Thanks

http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?t=187361

I'm not even going to read your post just say, "Oh God Please no"

So enthusiastic. :D

Angelus II
02-06-2008, 06:32 AM
Sweet!!! Venom back. Let just hope they don't mess this up, like Spider-Man 3.

Harlock
02-06-2008, 08:50 AM
I hope they keep Topher Grace in it. He didn't really get the chance to spread his acting wings in Spider-Man 3.

Agent Helix
02-06-2008, 09:02 AM
Thankfully, IESB.net was wrong, as usual.

Billy Parker
02-06-2008, 12:22 PM
Let just hope they don't mess this up, like Spider-Man 3.

Spider-Man 3 ruled!

Spidey-kid1
02-06-2008, 05:25 PM
Spider-Man 3 ruled!

Quoted!!!!

TheAmazingSpidey
02-06-2008, 05:33 PM
Spider-Man 3 ruled!

True. But not as good as Spider-Man 2. ;)

Billy Parker
02-06-2008, 06:20 PM
True. But not as good as Spider-Man 2. ;)

That seems to be a somewhat popular belief with interneters, but Spider-Man 3 is my favorite. Best villain, Harry Osborn.

spiderman_rj
02-06-2008, 06:33 PM
i am the only spiderfan who though the movie was a huge piece of crap ? bad plot,bad editing,it was awfull to watch,it was like (and more problably really was) they just shoot the scenes and put them toguether on a hurry,and kept changing the storyline.

i have forever erased it from my mind,the only good things i left were sandman birth,and harry fight peter.

Harlock
02-06-2008, 06:40 PM
i am the only spiderfan who though the movie was a huge piece of crap ? bad plot,bad editing,it was awfull to watch,it was like (and more problably really was) they just shoot the scenes and put them toguether on a hurry,and kept changing the storyline.

i have forever erased it from my mind,the only good things i left were sandman birth,and harry fight peter.

You are not alone. Hey, "Spider-Man 2 got it right". Manifesto in effect, holla!

Radioactive Zombie
02-06-2008, 06:41 PM
Dialouge/Dialog was horrid, in my opinion, and it was obviously kiddie.

Anyway, I've heard of the Venom movie, and he was supposed to play the anti-hero he was in his comics, but apparently, it was canceled, according to wikipedia.

becominAfanAgain
02-06-2008, 07:26 PM
Spider-Man 3 ruled!

Out of the three movies Spiderman 3 was the worse. SM2 and 1 were better. Personally I think SM2 was the best one.

Spidey-kid1
02-06-2008, 07:58 PM
Out of the three movies Spiderman 3 was the worse. SM2 and 1 were better. Personally I think SM2 was the best one.

For me, it was tied with number 2. My favorite is number 1. Green Goblin was amazing!

Angelus II
02-07-2008, 06:05 AM
Out of the three movies Spiderman 3 was the worse. SM2 and 1 were better. Personally I think SM2 was the best one.

The same here.

For all ya saying that Spider-Man 3 was awesome

Peter decided to become the superhero Spider-Man so nothing like what happen to his Uncle Ben will happen to anyone else. Meaning not letting a villain off the hook. This happen in Spider-Man 3 when Spidey let the Sandman leave without turn him over to the cops.

The sandman was a wanted man just like the guy who shot Peter's Uncle. Letting him off the hook is just like killing a person.

Bad movie, very bad movie

Mr. Earl Brooks
02-11-2008, 05:40 PM
You are not alone. Hey, "Spider-Man 2 got it right". Manifesto in effect, holla!

I'm with you fellas.

Why, ohh why, did we have to re-visit uncle ben's murder? When I first saw the trailer and it said Flint Marko was the guy that killed him I cringed.

Monty_Cristo
02-11-2008, 05:53 PM
For me, it was tied with number 2. My favorite is number 1. Green Goblin was amazing!

Osborn was amazing. the green ranger goblin was goofy looking; that fight scene around the balloons, especially.

Spider-Man 3 ruled!

Spider-man 3-Harry ruled. the rest...not so much. i lost all respect and sympathy for Parker a little before the midway point.

666andahalf
02-11-2008, 08:02 PM
Why, ohh why, did we have to re-visit uncle ben's murder? When I first saw the trailer and it said Flint Marko was the guy that killed him I cringed.

Rules of the third movie of a Trilogy. The past always comes back to bite you in the ass.

Come on, everyone. Spiderman 2 was not the shining gold standard everyone plays it out to be. There was like, what, 2 fight scenes with Doc Ock? Yes, they were awesome, but still, they undercut the villain and dragged out the "Spider-Man No More" and MJ drama WAAAAY too much. There was no sense of balance. In Spiderman 3, however, there is a MUCH better balance between the action and the drama. And the whole whining about Sandman being the killer just doesn't hold up. Look, Spidey still let the burgler go, who when he ran towards and nudge Flint, caused Sandman to fire and kill Ben. Besides, it gave Pete a personal reason to hate Sandman.

Anyways, back on topic, I'd be all for a Venom movie, since he wasn't in Spiderman 3 as much as I would have liked, but I'm weary because Marvel doesn't know how to make spin-offs very well...

Monty_Cristo
02-11-2008, 08:13 PM
Rules of the third movie of a Trilogy. The past always comes back to bite you in the ass.

Come on, everyone. Spiderman 2 was not the shining gold standard everyone plays it out to be. There was like, what, 2 fight scenes with Doc Ock? Yes, they were awesome, but still, they undercut the villain and dragged out the "Spider-Man No More" and MJ drama WAAAAY too much. There was no sense of balance. In Spiderman 3, however, there is a MUCH better balance between the action and the drama. And the whole whining about Sandman being the killer just doesn't hold up. Look, Spidey still let the burgler go, who when he ran towards and nudge Flint, caused Sandman to fire and kill Ben. Besides, it gave Pete a personal reason to hate Sandman.

Anyways, back on topic, I'd be all for a Venom movie, since he wasn't in Spiderman 3 as much as I would have liked, but I'm weary because Marvel doesn't know how to make spin-offs very well...


did he need a reason to hate Sandman? he already had Harry and Brock to contend with. the symbiote was already making him edgy. Sandman's story was simple. he was a desperate guy who was trying to steal money for whatever operation his kid needed. but that all got thrown out the window because of all the other subplots fighting for time. Peter sure forgave Sandman quickly enough at the end there. in my opinion, Sandman should have just been an escaped convict. Spider-man, in the black costume, should have aggressively kicked his butt; stopping him from pulling off whatever job he's doing. his kid should die partway through; giving Sandman the incentive to team up with Venom and go all giant sand monster-like. Harry's the only one who needed to do an aboutface (starting out a bad guy but coming back to the light).

666andahalf
02-11-2008, 08:17 PM
did he need a reason to hate Sandman? he already had Harry and Brock to contend with. the symbiote was already making him edgy. Sandman's story was simple. he was a desperate guy who was trying to steal money for whatever operation his kid needed. but that all got thrown out the window because of all the other subplots fighting for time. Peter sure forgave Sandman quickly enough at the end there. in my opinion, Sandman should have just been an escaped convict. Spider-man, in the black costume, should have aggressively kicked his butt; stopping him from pulling off whatever job he's doing. his kid should die partway through; giving Sandman the incentive to team up with Venom and go all giant sand monster-like. Harry's the only one who needed to do an aboutface (starting out a bad guy but coming back to the light).

Yeah, I admit, the movie would have been better if it was just a Harry/Venom movie, but that wasn't going to be an option...

Mr. Earl Brooks
02-11-2008, 08:53 PM
Rules of the third movie of a Trilogy. The past always comes back to bite you in the ass.

That's a retarded rule. Flint Marko killing uncle ben was so random.

Come on, everyone. Spiderman 2 was not the shining gold standard everyone plays it out to be. There was like, what, 2 fight scenes with Doc Ock? Yes, they were awesome, but still, they undercut the villain and dragged out the "Spider-Man No More" and MJ drama WAAAAY too much. There was no sense of balance. In Spiderman 3, however, there is a MUCH better balance between the action and the drama.

Dude, there was a frickin musical song and dance queer off right in the middle. This is what happens when super hero movies over extend in terms of villains. There were 3 villians in the third film, and with exception to Osbourne, they were underdeveloped. The drama was lame and cheesy and the violence (which I normally love in all forms) was so-so.

Anyways, back on topic, I'd be all for a Venom movie, since he wasn't in Spiderman 3 as much as I would have liked, but I'm weary because Marvel doesn't know how to make spin-offs very well...

I JUST WANT TO SEE CARNAGE!!!!!

kury-bop
02-11-2008, 09:27 PM
I hope they keep Topher Grace in it. He didn't really get the chance to spread his acting wings in Spider-Man 3.
I hope they don't. Topher Grace was a horrible Brock.

Venom
02-12-2008, 08:31 AM
I just hope it's true and not a stupid rumour that there's going to be a Venom movie.

Bulky Brent
02-12-2008, 08:42 AM
It's highly unlikely that we will see a venom movie.Marvel has a bad track record when it comes to making spinoffs just look at Elektra for example.

Venom
02-12-2008, 08:59 AM
It's highly unlikely that we will see a venom movie.Marvel has a bad track record when it comes to making spinoffs just look at Elektra for example.

I actually had that on DVD because at the time I thought it was a cool movie. As I got older I just thought it was an ok movie, so I gave it to the charity shop.

Bulky Brent
02-12-2008, 09:35 AM
I actually had that on DVD because at the time I thought it was a cool movie. As I got older I just thought it was an ok movie, so I gave it to the charity shop.
It only came out 2 years ago though to be honest I think this is the only spinoff movie that Marvel has ever made the should see how well the upcoming X-Men Origins: Wolverine project does before they decide to make a better spinoff.

Venom
02-12-2008, 10:11 AM
It only came out 2 years ago though to be honest I think this is the only spinoff movie that Marvel has ever made the should see how well the upcoming X-Men Origins: Wolverine project does before they decide to make a better spinoff.

Actually it was just over 3 years ago. I was 17 when it came out and now I'm 20. My mind matured a hell of a lot during my late teen years. I've got college to thank for that. It really taught me a lot about life. I actually felt like Peter Parker on my second year at college because I had a lot of similar situations happen to me that happened to him in the comics.

Mideon
02-12-2008, 12:47 PM
haha Ooooooooooook

The Shelf
02-12-2008, 01:16 PM
I actually felt like Peter Parker on my second year at college because I had a lot of similar situations happen to me that happened to him in the comics.

Dude, you fought crime in the wee hours of the night?! That's awesome!

RodeoWearden
02-12-2008, 01:39 PM
I hated Topher as Eddie. His acting felt so very very forced. Especially as Venom. He did his own voice acting for the Spider-Man 3 game and it was just awful. It got to a point where I just played the game with the volume muted on the off chance that I might hear his voice.

Monty_Cristo
02-12-2008, 04:14 PM
That's a retarded rule. Flint Marko killing uncle ben was so random.

Flint Marko killing Ben was retarded. but the rule is gold. Peter's past did catch up with him from the 2nd movie. Harry remembers his identity and came after him.

Dude, you fought crime in the wee hours of the night?! That's awesome!

i didn't but there was a month in college that i'd dress up in costume at night and pretend to patrol for crime. the campus was just set up for stuff like that. it was a lot of fun.

Venom
02-12-2008, 08:46 PM
Dude, you fought crime in the wee hours of the night?! That's awesome!

I know. That darn Green Goblin made me late for my test to pass the course that year. :D

I felt like Peter Parker that year because of girl troubles like when Peter was constantly involved in a love triangle with Mary Jane and Gwen Stacey during the early Stan Lee and John Romita issues.

666andahalf
02-13-2008, 05:55 PM
That's a retarded rule. Flint Marko killing uncle ben was so random.

But it still involved something regarding his past actions. And as far as the random thing? So was his organic webbing and the Green Goblin's power ranger armor in the first one but no one complains as much about those coming out of no where. Come on, you have to allow for some creative thinking whether you agree with it or not.

Dude, there was a frickin musical song and dance queer off right in the middle. This is what happens when super hero movies over extend in terms of villains. There were 3 villians in the third film, and with exception to Osborn, they were underdeveloped. The drama was lame and cheesy and the violence (which I normally love in all forms) was so-so.

Ok, so you liked the repetitive drama in Spiderman 2 better? Here's a summary:

MJ: "Peter, be with me"
Peter: "No"

Peter: "MJ, be with me"
MJ: "No"

MJ: "Peter, be with me"
Peter: "No"

Lather, rinse, repeat.

I thought the dance scene what f%&^@# hilarious, like everyone else I knew that saw the movie. Silly? Definitely, but also entertaining. And the argument about "the villains were underdeveloped" doesn't hold up as well. What more development did you want? Sure, they shouldn't have cut the scene where Sandman meets his family at the park before he meets Venom, but it didn't hurt his character in the long run. Character development is designed to understand the characters actions and motivations. I think we clearly understood both Sandman's and Venom's motivations.

I JUST WANT TO SEE CARNAGE!!!!!

That, sir, I agree with you on completely.

666andahalf
02-13-2008, 05:58 PM
I know. That darn Green Goblin made me late for my test to pass the course that year. :D

You don't happen to have a best friend who's dad runs a multi-billion dollar (or in your case, multi-billion Pound) company? If so, I'd keep my eye on him if I were you... ;)

Venom
02-15-2008, 08:12 AM
You don't happen to have a best friend who's dad runs a multi-billion dollar (or in your case, multi-billion Pound) company? If so, I'd keep my eye on him if I were you... ;)

My best friend's dad is a cheif. Should I be worried? :D