PDA

View Full Version : So I'm thinking that Professor X might really be a...


anthony!
06-24-2007, 09:50 AM
... a brainwashed sleeper agent for the Skrulls.

Not a Skrull, mind you, that would be too hard to rectify against current events.

However, I was flipping through the first 3 issues of New Avengers Illuminati and I can't help but notice a few things:

1.) In the first issue, the Skrulls point out that it would be fairly easy to map out his DNA. He's only a mutant, after all.

2.) Same issue. When Tony rescues Charles, the Prof seems to share a brief moment with one of his Skrull captors after suffering a psychic attack. At first glance it seems to come off as just a "Charles gets a little payback" moment, but it could be more. IIRC, the Skrull says "Nooooo..." and "Noooo...stop."

3.) Issue two. At the end, when each member receives an infinity gem, its Charles the "camera" decides to focus on. At first I thought this was forshadowing Chuck getting his powers back via the Mind Gem, but as we all know the M'Kraan crystal took care of that recently. If that be the case, why point out Charles as opposed to the other Illuminati?

4.) Issue three. Its Charles that brings together the Illuminati to confront the Beyonder, whom HE has determined is a mutant inhuman. Could this have been a ruse to place the Illuminati in danger?

5.) Same issue. Its mentioned not once, but TWICE that Blackbolt cannot remember the Beyonder's entry into the Terrigen Mists. There's a vague flashback, showing it— but it could easily be something else entirely. Could Chuck have removed the memory from Blackbolt's mind?

I hesitate to say the Professor is a Skrull. It's a.) been done before and b.) far to difficult to rectify with all the events that have happened to the professor since the Kree/Skrull War.

My thinking is that they intended to brainwash him into a Skrull agent using their gene-mapping and manipulation, but were interupted by Tony's rescue.

If thats the case, maybe Charles its totally himself most of the time (thus keeping his X-stories totally legit), but is occasionally "turned on" by the Skrulls whenever the need or want him. Certainly the fact that Charles knows the wherebouts of an infinity gem would be golden info for an invading Skrull Empire!

Thoughts? Am I drinking too much crazy?

drupgyu
06-24-2007, 09:40 PM
I think you may be onto something....

Omega Alpha
06-24-2007, 09:54 PM
No chance of that happening. Bendis is doing everything to make everyone sure they won't retcon the entire Marvel Universe, and making Xavier from every moment post GS X-men #1 a Skrull would be a retcon as big and as stupid, if not more, than Ben Reilly and the Clone Saga. Plus, Bendis doesn't write any X-men books, and it wouldn't make any sense for him to do something that would affect them that much (sure, you can say he wrote House of M, but depowering most of mutantkind was an order from Quesada), specially because we already have been told that the X-books won't be affected by this storyline, and it will run mostly on Avengers books. And Xavier is Brubaker's character, they won't force their most acclaimed writer to make him a Skrull, specially because from the 4 other Illuminati characters, two are written by Bendis himself and two, the less popular ones, don't appear on any ongoings (but i don't think any of the Illuminati will be Skrulls anyway).

Beast
06-24-2007, 09:54 PM
Sorry. It wouldn't make a lick of sense with Deadly Genesis or Rise and Fall of the Shi'ar Empire.

Omega Alpha
06-24-2007, 09:56 PM
Sorry. It wouldn't make a lick of sense with Deadly Genesis or Rise and Fall of the Shi'ar Empire.

Or any other storyline on the last 30 years. Plus, Xavier died in Secret Wars, if he was a Skrull, his body would have returned to it's natural state.

Kalen O.
06-24-2007, 09:59 PM
Or any other storyline on the last 30 years. Plus, Xavier died in Secret Wars, if he was a Skrull, his body would have returned to it's natural state.

In the original poster's defense, he did pretty clearly state that he wasn't suggesting Xavier was a Skrull, but a brainwashed sleeper agent of the Skrulls.

Beast
06-24-2007, 09:59 PM
Or any other storyline on the last 30 years. Plus, Xavier died in Secret Wars, if he was a Skrull, his body would have returned to it's natural state.
Yeah. I didn't bother to read the whole thread. Mostly because I'm sick of the theory. But I was just noting it wouldn't make sense with those two stories. Or like you said, any story in the last 30 years. It's a stupid idea. But then so is retconning that anyone was a Skrull for decades of stories is idiotic.

Beast
06-24-2007, 10:00 PM
In the original poster's defense, he did pretty clearly state that he wasn't suggesting Xavier was a Skrull, but a brainwashed sleeper agent of the Skrulls.
Which wouldn't make sense either. In fact, it would be downright ass.

The Sword Is Drawn
06-25-2007, 01:57 AM
In a word, 'No'. In three words. 'Really, really, no'.

Pro
06-25-2007, 02:03 AM
The only truly funny skrull uber-retcon would be if everyone on earth turned out to be a brainwashed skrull. Barring that the skrull invasion needs to be handled subtly but could be fun. Shapeshifters should always be subtle and the skrulls often have been less than subtle. A shapeshifter can do untold damage by instigating trouble at the source rather than being deadsmack in the middle.

The Sword Is Drawn
06-25-2007, 02:05 AM
Bring back The Skrull Beatles.

They should have a mini series of their own... ;)

streator
06-25-2007, 08:15 AM
i don't think xavier is a skrull.

namor or reed, maybe...

Karl H
06-25-2007, 08:17 AM
Bring back The Skrull Beatles.

They should have a mini series of their own... ;)

They could team up with Cadre K!!!!!!!!

Omega Alpha
06-25-2007, 09:18 AM
i don't think xavier is a skrull.

namor or reed, maybe...


Reed died on Secret Wars too...

kate-pryde
06-25-2007, 09:27 AM
Considering the amount of time Rachel spent in Xavier's head when they were psi-linked during the Shi'ar arc makes Xavier being a Skrull nearly impossible. She would have noticed.

DDM
06-25-2007, 09:33 AM
The Skrull idea is full of too many plot holes. When the Brood Queen egg hatches in Uncanny X-Men #167, the Brood gains all of Xavier's memories, experience, & mutant telepathy. A Brood would have been able to see through the Skrull's disguise & kill him. Furthermore, given the Skrull's a genetic dead-ends, the Brood would not have been able to absorb telepathy because the Skrull would have used artificial means to give himself telepathy.

Yes, this is one terrible idea right next to Vulcan.

Keith_Martineau
06-25-2007, 09:45 AM
Not to mention none of this would make any sense in the context of Uncanny X-Men 274-276. He was already a skrull then. It'd be redundant for a Skrull to capture and emulate a Skrull.

anthony!
06-25-2007, 10:16 AM
Okay, say it with me now: Professor X is not a Skrull.

Again, its too hard to rectify against all the events you guys mention. Charles has been broken, cloned, killed, tortured, mind raped, mind-melded, and impersonated by Skrulls far too many times to have it all make sense.

BUT, more than any other character- New Avengers Illuminati strongly implies that something is up with Chuck. There has yet to be any real indication that Reed or Namor are Skrull-fied, thought that still could be the case.

If the Skrulls "know" Charles DNA inside and out, that could be a very handy tool for them. It could give them the ability to use Charles without replacing him, at strategically benefical times and without his knowledge and beyond detection.

After all, Wolverine didn't catch on to Elektra's Skrully scent.

All the Skrulls really need to be able to do is see through Chuck's eyes on occasion. Its entirely possible (and reasonable) to do that without retconning or calling bullshit on 30 years of stories.

cable guy
06-25-2007, 10:39 AM
You have some well thought out stuff there.

No chance of it happening though.