PDA

View Full Version : The UN proposes strengthened sanctions to deal with Al-Qaeda



jmc247
05-08-2007, 04:21 PM
According to the sanctions regime, States are required to freeze financial assets controlled by the Taliban, and to ensure that they are not used by the group. Countries are also obliged to freeze funds, property and other financial assets of Usama bin Laden and his associates in the Al-Qaida organization, and to prevent their entry or transit through the State’s territory.

In addition, nations must prevent the supply, sale and transfer of all arms and materiel - along with any form of military training - to the named individuals and entities.

In addition to its recommendations, the Committee reminded States that are victims of Al-Qaida-related attacks that it is possible for them to add suspects to the sanctions list. It also reminded them of their obligations to prosecute any of their nationals who violate the arms embargo.

The sanctions were originally adopted, and later tightened, in response to the indictment of Usama bin Laden for the 1998 terrorist bombings of US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam.

http://www.judeoscope.ca/breve.php3?id_breve=3583

Sanctions on al-Qaeda and the recient sanctions put on Iran shows the UN is deeply involved in combating terrorism and dealing with world problems.

Paul McEnery
05-08-2007, 04:30 PM
Sanctions on al-Qaeda and the recient sanctions put on Iran shows the UN is deeply involved in combating terrorism and dealing with world problems.

Boy, you really like to stoop low with your disinformation, don't you.

What a crock of shit.

One tiny interpol issue about supplying materiel and finances to known Al-Qaeda operatives -- BFD.

And then you stuff it in there with Iran, as if it's in any way the same thing.

Every piece of propaganda you have pushed on this board has turned out to be horseshit. This one doesn't even count as propaganda until your commentary intervened. So why don't you take your propaganda and shove it.

(Or, to put it more politely, take this as an invitation to contribute to the board in any positive way you can find, but please, your continued propaganda against Islam and Iran is tantamount to lying; and has at every turn been shown to be at best the deliberate spreading of someone else's lies with the intent of causing actual harm. Please please stop it.)

Royal
05-08-2007, 04:43 PM
Al-Qaeda has an organization!?!

jmc247
05-08-2007, 04:45 PM
Boy, you really like to stoop low with your disinformation, don't you.

What a crock of shit.

And then you stuff it in there with Iran, as if it's in any way the same thing.



So you don't think the UN putting stronger sanctions al-Qaeda and reciently Iran is a good thing? Do you not support the UN as a world making body or do you just think they are simply carrying Bush's water when they put stronger sanctions on a terrorist groups or an Islamic state enriching uranium?

Paul McEnery
05-08-2007, 04:52 PM
So you don't think the UN putting stronger sanctions al-Qaeda and reciently Iran is a good thing? Do you not support the UN as a world making body or do you just think they are simply carrying Bush's water when they put stronger sanctions on a terrorist groups or an Islamic state enriching uranium?

I'm saying that your duplicitous use of the word "sanctions" here is intended to lead to a false impression.

The word "sanctions" -- even within the propaganda site you cited -- clearly refers simply to criminal sanctions within national and international law enforcement.

Your attempt to link that with Iran is contemptible.

Everyone knows that Al Qaeda had no connection to Iraq. It has exactly the same connection to Iran -- none whatsoever.

There is no reason to post this except to further your cause of maintaining hostilities with Islam and starting a war with Iran. Which you've stood up for plenty of times in the past.

That sort of thing sounds like race-baiting bigotry to me, which is why I always ask Brian to put a stop to it. I understand his point of view in favour of freedom of speech. I just don't think that incitement to hatred counts as freedom of speech.

And on this board, it certainly shouldn't count as civility.

jmc247
05-08-2007, 04:54 PM
I'm saying that your duplicitous use of the word "sanctions" here is intended to lead to a false impression.


Boy are you full of cow dung. Did you even look at the UN's own web site the article came from.

It uses the exact same words and title getting rid of the Taliban because it took up too much space.

"UN panel proposes measures to strengthen sanctions on Taliban, Al-Qaida"

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=22476&Cr=qaida&Cr1=taliban

I expect you will feel not that good after throwing out that idiotic invective at me without looking at the actual UN's title of the article. But, of course you will suck it up to throw out another round and I will ignore those as well.

Paul McEnery
05-08-2007, 05:03 PM
Boy are you full of cow dung. Did you even look at the UN's own web site the article came from.

It uses the exact same words and title getting rid of the Taliban because it took up too much space.

"UN panel proposes measures to strengthen sanctions on Taliban, Al-Qaida"

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=22476&Cr=qaida&Cr1=taliban

I expect you will feel not that good after throwing out that idiotic invective at me without looking at the actual UN's title of the article. But, of course you will suck it up to throw out another round and I will ignore those as well.

Well, you've been told two times now, so either you can't understand what I'm writing, or you're deliberately being obtuse.

You are misusing the word sanctions in your title. You are misusing the word sanctions when you speak about Taliban/Al Qaeda sanctions (which are criminal sanctions through law enforcement agencies) as if it were the same thing as economic sanctions on Iran.

These are two completely different uses of the word. You are attempting to make them mean the same thing when it patently does not, and I have now spelt out twice before it does not.

There is no point to your post except to spread disinformation. And that's contemptible.

Naldo
05-09-2007, 08:10 AM
A review of Rules 1, 3 & 7 might be in order for Paul.

HomerJay
05-09-2007, 09:24 AM
Sanctions on al-Qaeda and the recient sanctions put on Iran shows the UN is deeply involved in combating terrorism and dealing with world problems.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v655/HomerJay64/orlybabyog6.gif