PDA

View Full Version : British French Union late 1950's?


warspite1805
01-15-2007, 10:54 AM
This just remarkable

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261885.stm

When Britain and France nearly married
By Mike Thomson
Presenter, Document



The major event of the year was the Suez episode

Formerly secret documents unearthed from the National Archives have showed Britain and France considered a "union" in the 1950s.

On 10 September 1956 French Prime Minister Guy Mollet arrived in London for talks with his British counterpart, Anthony Eden.

These were troubled times for Mollet's France. Egypt's President Gamel Abdel Nasser had nationalised the Suez Canal and, as if that was not enough, he was also busy funding separatists in French Algeria, fuelling a bloody mutiny that was costing the country's colonial masters dear.

Monsieur Mollet was ready to fight back and he was determined to get Britain's help to do it.

Formerly secret documents held in Britain's National Archives in London, which have lain virtually unnoticed since being released two decades ago, reveal the extraordinary proposal Mollet was about to make.


Really I am stuttering because this idea is so preposterous

Henri Soutou
Historian

The following is an extract from a British government cabinet paper of the day. It reads:

"When the French Prime Minister, Monsieur Mollet was recently in London he raised with the prime minister the possibility of a union between the United Kingdom and France."

Mollet was desperate to hit back at Nasser. He was also an Anglophile who admired Britain both for its help in two world wars and its blossoming welfare state.

There was another reason, too, that the French prime minister proposed this radical plan.

Tension was growing at this time along the border between Israel and Jordan. France was an ally of Israel and Britain of Jordan. If events got out of control there, French and British soldiers could soon be fighting each other.

With the Suez issue on the boil Mollet could not let such a disaster happen.

Secret document

So, when Eden turned down his request for a union between France and Britain the French prime minister came up with another proposal.

HAVE YOUR SAY
We could have been a considerable force today had we gone ahead with a union

Daniel Cook, UK


Send us your comments
This time, while Eden was on a visit to Paris, he requested that France be allowed to join the British Commonwealth.

A secret document from 28 September 1956 records the surprisingly enthusiastic way the British premier responded to the proposal when he discussed it with his Cabinet Secretary, Sir Norman Brook.

It says: "Sir Norman Brook asked to see me this morning and told me he had come up from the country consequent on a telephone conversation from the prime minister who is in Wiltshire.

"The PM told him on the telephone that he thought in the light of his talks with the French:


"That we should give immediate consideration to France joining the Commonwealth

"That Monsieur Mollet had not thought there need be difficulty over France accepting the headship of her Majesty

"That the French would welcome a common citizenship arrangement on the Irish basis"
Seeing these words for the first time, Henri Soutou, professor of contemporary history at Paris's Sorbonne University almost fell off his chair.

Stammering repeatedly he said: "Really I am stuttering because this idea is so preposterous. The idea of joining the Commonwealth and accepting the headship of Her Majesty would not have gone down well. If this had been suggested more recently Mollet might have found himself in court."


Textbooks

Nationalist MP Jacques Myard was similarly stunned on being shown the papers, saying: "I tell you the truth, when I read that I am quite astonished. I had a good opinion of Mr Mollet before. I think I am going to revise that opinion.


"I am just amazed at reading this because since the days I was learning history as a student I have never heard of this. It is not in the textbooks."

It seems that the French prime minister decided to quietly forget about his strange proposals.

No record of them seems to exist in the French archives and it is clear that he told few other ministers of the day about them.

This might well be because after Britain decided to pull out of Suez, the battle against President Nasser was lost and all talk of union died too.

Instead, when the EEC was born the following year, France teamed up with Germany while Britain watched on. The rest, it seems, is history.

Charles RB
01-15-2007, 11:48 AM
Huh! Now that's strange.

The term "union" is confusing me - do they mean union in the EU sense or something else?

king mob
01-15-2007, 12:39 PM
It would have been France becoming part of the Commenwealth, it really is an amazing discovery.

warspite1805
01-15-2007, 01:22 PM
I just can not see it working as proposed, the only time I can see an Anglo-French mergeer suceeding is in the direct aftermathe of the Great War.

Tages
01-15-2007, 01:36 PM
Anyone in the UK or France that went ahead with such a plan would never have won reelection.

Ray R.
01-15-2007, 01:38 PM
That's like cats marrying dogs.

Might have legs in a theoretical sense, like conquering Iraq and setting up a democracy and watching all the other Middle East states decide it's a great idea and join in. That was a far-fetched policy made reality, so I suppose it's not out of the realm of possibility.

Still, Canada has problems keeping Quebec in line, and the British Commonwealth would swallow up France? I don't think so.

I personally love France, but hate the French (and I'm of French-Canadian descent). Can't see the Brits swallowing that piece of quiche without choking.....

BlairH
01-15-2007, 02:25 PM
Arf! They tried to surrender to us and we weren't even at war with them!

Agent Helix
01-15-2007, 04:38 PM
Fascinating, but what would we have called them? The Brench? The Fritish?

Iangould
01-15-2007, 10:15 PM
T

These were troubled times for Mollet's France. Egypt's President Gamel Abdel Nasser had nationalised the Suez Canal and, as if that was not enough, he was also busy funding separatists in French Algeria, fuelling a bloody mutiny that was costing the country's colonial masters dear.

I love how that's phrased to imply that the dirty, stinky lazy improvident French were out to sponge of the virtuous industrious British.

Because its not like the British had also been defeated in the Suez Crisis and was also facing uprising across its colonial empire.

Iangould
01-15-2007, 10:18 PM
Anyone want to tell me why this is innately more absurd than the EEC which was launched the following year - and which Britain nearly joined from the start?

dingo
01-15-2007, 10:19 PM
Anyone in the UK or France that went ahead with such a plan would never have won reelection.

Reelection would be the least of their worries.
Lynching would be the top of the list.

thehod
01-16-2007, 01:08 AM
Hell, the country shoulda been ours anyway. Henry V came within a gnats bollock of being crowned King of France in August 1419. Then he went and died and we lost all the land he'd just spent the last ten years winning.

We held Calais until 1558 and it wasn't until 1802 when George III officially dropped his claim to the title King of France.

Personally her maj should march into Paris, thrust the union jack into the side of the Arc de Triomphe and dare anyone to come and have a go if they think they're hard enough.

dingo
01-16-2007, 01:12 AM
Personally her maj should march into Paris, thrust the union jack into the side of the Arc de Triomphe and dare anyone to come and have a go if they think they're hard enough.

Does one think one is hard enough then?
Come on. Does ones mother sew?

thehod
01-16-2007, 01:30 AM
Does one think one is hard enough then?
Come on. Does ones mother sew?

Is one addressing me or is one masticating on a house brick? Because either way one loses one's fucking teeth.

Iangould
01-16-2007, 03:35 AM
Personally her maj should march into Paris, thrust the union jack into the side of the Arc de Triomphe and dare anyone to come and have a go if they think they're hard enough.

Hmmm, Jean Reno versus Betty Windsor.

I know where my money's going.

thehod
01-16-2007, 03:41 AM
Hmmm, Jean Reno versus Betty Windsor.

I know where my money's going.

So that's $100 on the one wearing the tiara then?

Of course, Betty will be weilding this....

http://www.royalexhibitions.com/BCJ%20photo%20Sceptre%20with%20dove%20web.jpg

Iangould
01-16-2007, 05:17 AM
Jean just has to look at her and fluids will start flowing in places Phil never reached.