View Full Version : It's great to have Churchill back doing Supergirl pencils.
Killer Bee
12-29-2006, 11:01 AM
Anyone else feel the same? I liked Conner's work last issue, but I suppose that I've grown attached to the way Churchill pencils Kara.
Jack Zodiac
12-29-2006, 12:08 PM
I only bought the last issue for Amanda's art, which I loved, and still like better than Churchill's. I did buy this last issue of Supergirl, though, because I was interested in Power Boy after seeing him in 52. Same old Churchill art, same old Churchill panty shots. I like how he gave Power Boy a nice hairy chest, too.
karasu
12-29-2006, 12:31 PM
Outside of Ultraman(freaking nuts!) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/karasux/Ultraman.jpg), I'm not too fond of Churchill's faces.
The Mirrorball Man
12-30-2006, 02:01 AM
I don't like Churchill's art at all and in my opinion, "Supergirl" really needs a more cartoony artist.
AaronJ
12-30-2006, 02:15 AM
Churchill and Rapmund (along with Reis on colors) do AMAZING work on Supergirl.
There's all sorts of subtlety, little clues, tiny hints ... every single panel, especially the way that Kelly writes, is absolutely critical. Each image in each panel is critical.
The beautiful, lovely, stunning art that Churchill, Rapmund, and Reis have done on this title is deserving of a lot more respect than it has received.
SKETCHSANCHEZ
12-30-2006, 03:06 AM
I like the book but cant stand the art.
I honestly feel like he gives supergirl the worst facial expressions, enough to make me want to punch her in the mouth :p haha, but seriously, I hate it. And he draws her torso too long.
I only bought the last issue for Amanda's art, which I loved, and still like better than Churchill's. I did buy this last issue of Supergirl, though, because I was interested in Power Boy after seeing him in 52. Same old Churchill art, same old Churchill panty shots. I like how he gave Power Boy a nice hairy chest, too.
What panty shots? He never has those. Even despite that he draws the shortest skirt for her out of all other artists that have drawn her, he manages to not have them,
I wish he did, then I wouldt have something to distract me from those horrible faces. HAW
jade_nova
12-30-2006, 10:15 AM
I am glad to see him back. His artwork helps to disguie the poor writing of this series.
Kid Kyoto
12-30-2006, 10:27 AM
What panty shots? He never has those. Even despite that he draws the shortest skirt for her out of all other artists that have drawn her, he manages to not have them,
I agree Churchill has been restrained so far but there is an upskirt panty shot in this issue.
Feel free to complain or cheer as you will.
I agree. Now that Connor's off the book, I have no reason to buy it. =P
karasu
12-30-2006, 03:39 PM
How can anyone reading a superhero book complain about panty shots? Most superheros wear their underoos on the outside of their pants. :eek:
Outside of Ultraman(freaking nuts!) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/karasux/Ultraman.jpg), I'm not too fond of Churchill's faces.
Hell, Kara's face looked like A GUY WITH TOO MUCH MAKEUP ON for one panel in the latest issue. Maybe she's Jack Sparrow's cousin instead. :D
Jack Zodiac
12-30-2006, 08:16 PM
There's all sorts of subtlety, little clues, tiny hints ... every single panel, especially the way that Kelly writes, is absolutely critical. Each image in each panel is critical.
Eh. I'll agree that he fits the book, especially under Kelly's pen, but I'm not seeing this. Care to point a few of these out?
Jack Zodiac
12-30-2006, 08:18 PM
What panty shots?
Yeah, I should've said "upskirt" shots. Lotta' thigh, a hint of groin, but usually no panty. This issue, though, had straight panty.
If you're wondering, they're blue. I was bankin' on red with a little yellow "S."
SKETCHSANCHEZ
01-02-2007, 09:08 AM
I agree Churchill has been restrained so far but there is an upskirt panty shot in this issue.
Feel free to complain or cheer as you will.
Sounds like a reason to cheer my friend. :p
Drakonnen
01-02-2007, 09:39 AM
What panty shots? He never has those. Even despite that he draws the shortest skirt for her out of all other artists that have drawn her, he manages to not have them,
I wish he did, then I wouldt have something to distract me from those horrible faces. HAW
In issue 13 which just came out he did his first Supergirl panty shot. Blue in case you were wondering (I was hoping for white, lol).
Considering how short that skirt is it was about time you saw what was under there. It was almost unrealistic to never have seen it so far, and the way it was done wasn't sexual.
I much much MUCH prefer Churchill's art to Conners. I HATED Conner's cartoony art. It was interesting for one issue but it completely didn't feel like Supergirl.
That said, Churchill does need to work on making female characters look different (as with the oft mentioned Wondergirl and Supergirl looking like twins). However, Supergirl looks great when he is drawing her.
Killer Bee
01-02-2007, 12:22 PM
Wow, whole lotta mixed reactions. >_>
Harding Prime
01-02-2007, 03:58 PM
I guess because he is the original artist for the character, I like the way Churchill draws her. Everyone hates on her about the way she looks, but I like it because its different then how all the other characters look.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.