PDA

View Full Version : Is "Criminal" the first "Fell" Variant


goman
11-03-2006, 10:14 AM
I read Criminal #1 and 2 yesterday, and it got me thinking this morning that it's a variant on the so-called Fell format. So far we basically have two books in the proper Fell format (i.e. $1.99 for 16 pages of art with 4 pages of back-matter) Fell and Casanova. Before Fell came out, Ellis was talking about how he wanted to create a single issue that gave people more bang for the buck, hence the lower price. I think both Fell and cassanova have succeeded in that mission, as each read very well in singles and take a bit more time to read. I think Criminal is also going for that.

At $2.99, you get, I think 22+ pages of art, plus some Brubaker back material, plus (and for a Marvel book, this is a big plus) no ads till the end. Also you get the nice wrap-around cover, that makes it look more like a novel, than the traditional magazine look with the back page ad. I took me a good deal longer to get through each of these issues than a regular issue, which is nice.

I don't know if Brubaker is intentionally using Fell as a model for criminal, but it make a bit of sence, and I think it works. I'd argue that criminal is a truly mature book, with out resorting to the traps of other "mature" books, such as excessive language, sex and violence. It reads like a good crime novel, and I think, along with Fell, is one of the best new books to get new readers into comics.

I almost wish they could package a few other similar series together and come out with something more in line with a magazine or a manga monthly (not the small bookstore size, but Shonen Jump style.) I've long thought that publishers should start printing comics in larger books with three or four similar stories, with a slightly higher price point, but go for magazine distribution. But now I'm off topic.

I'm left to wonder if the stuff from the back of the book will make it into the trade for Criminal. If they do, where do you place it in the trade? if you haven't read the issue yet, Brubaker writes an essay on his favorite noir movie. It ties in with the series, kind of, but doesn't really match anything in the issue. it's just a peak into Brubabker's mind on the subject of crime fiction. The article is very interesting, need to find that movie and watch it, but it's basically like a letter column, which usually doesn't end up in the trade.

I've gone on too long now. i guess I'm just looking to see if anyone agrees with my assesment. I think this is a book that will actually read better in the singles. Issue 2 was probably better than issue 1, IMO. Stick with the singles, I think that's going to be the best way to read the series.

Augie De Blieck Jr.
11-03-2006, 11:48 AM
I think it's more in the vein of POWERS. They're both in the ICON line of creator-owned properties, and both pack their book with as much material as humanly possible.

-Augie

pmpknface
11-03-2006, 12:01 PM
Another thing that seperates Fell & Cass from Powers & Criminal (I think) is the "slab of culture" theory. Fell is supposed to be a story in 1 comic, although condensed. Powers & Criminal are still more arc related.

But I do see the similarities and like that these creators are jamming as much info as possible into 1 comic.

Augie De Blieck Jr.
11-03-2006, 12:35 PM
How long ago was it that I predicted a move in comics towards chattier/talking heads comics gaining in popularity over widescreen/manga-fied comics? A couple of years now, right?

Maybe I was just ahead of my time. ;-)

-Augie

pmpknface
11-03-2006, 12:58 PM
Why Augie's so smart...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6b/Glaskugel_CrystalBall.jpg/240px-Glaskugel_CrystalBall.jpg

goman
11-03-2006, 01:15 PM
That's a good point about the Arc vs. The Single, although Cassanova kind of bucks that by having a sort of arc, even Fraction says that isue 7 ends Volume 1, I believe that's how he put it. I think it's a good thing that there are writers who are making sure that each single is worth the money spent, which is what I think Criminal is going for. Brubaker and Phillips (and Marvel to a degree) are purposefully saying, "Each issue, we'll give the reader part of the story, some prose material in the back, and strip of 'Frank Kafka', and wrap it in a nice cover, and have minimal ads." You've got to line up for a single that can do that month in, month out.

I think it was that film review by Bru that got me thinking. I don't think I read the printed part in issue 1 of Criminal, want to say it was a short story. The backmater portion just made me see similarities and differences between the two.

I guess I'm just trying to get as many people as possible to buy the singles of this series, and not wait for the trade. It's a series worth keeping around for a long while, and I don't want it to die a premature death like Sleeper, (which I bought in trades, so I'm making sure I'm part of the solution.)

pmpknface
11-03-2006, 01:23 PM
I do what I can to "support" books I like, but I just can't do this with everything. I'm already buying FELL and CASS sucked me in, so I'm waiting for the CRIMINAL tpb.

Another book I've also been buying since day 1 is REX MUNDI, and I like to think I helped keep it going. But for every Rex that I buy monthly, there's a ROCKETO that I'm waiting for.

goman
11-03-2006, 02:27 PM
I understand about not having enough money to support everything. The problem with having so many good books coming out is that you can't buy everything, and even if you had the money, you don't have time to read everything. I think Rex Mundi is going to become a victim of a micro purge for me. It's not that I don't enjoy it, at least from the two issues I've bought so far, it's just that I need to read the rest of the story to get caught up. Damn talented creators and thier good books!

dancj
11-06-2006, 06:04 AM
How long ago was it that I predicted a move in comics towards chattier/talking heads comics gaining in popularity over widescreen/manga-fied comics? A couple of years now, right?

Maybe I was just ahead of my time. ;-)

-Augie

Hmmm... but 8+ years behind Brian Bendis

Augie De Blieck Jr.
11-06-2006, 06:42 AM
And 15 behind Keith Giffen and J.M. DeMatteis.

No, I just mean a more overall trend, not necessarily isolated examples here and there. After AUTHORITY, everyone tried to do widescreen to some degree. And while Bendis is still the "authority" on very chatty comics, I think there is a larger move towards talking heads in comics today than there has ever been.

Although, from what I hear, CRIMINAL #2 ramped up the action, so it would completely nullify my argument from that angle.

-Augie

pmpknface
11-06-2006, 06:51 AM
I don't know that it's as much "talking heads" as it is making a comic a more "dense" read.

People say talking heads and I get a Bendis page in my head of 2 looooong strings of word balloons. But making a comic a little more dense has many other storytelling tricks involved like using more panels, making more happen in each panel, and putting enough interesting art on the page so it makes the reader take their time to soak in every detail.

Then there are the added features in the back that add to the length of time it takes to read the book.

That's jus tmy $.02.

goman
11-06-2006, 09:48 AM
I don't know that it's as much "talking heads" as it is making a comic a more "dense" read.

I think that's what I'm going for in calling Criminal a Fell-variant. It's giving us more bang for the buck than most other single issues. I hope that will be the movement to motivate more people to buy singles, as opposed to what Marvel and DC are trying to do to get people to buy singles, i.e "Every issue ties into our crossover" or "Every issues changes EVERYTHING." Criminal, I'd say, is not filled with a ton of dialogue, especially issue #2, but it's packed with stuff going on, and after reading it, I didn't feel 2 minutes had passed. Fell is all about making that single issue worth buying, the "slab of culture." Criminal is just a different kind of slab.