PDA

View Full Version : Should Bill Clinton Be Dipped In Pudding?



Damo
10-07-2006, 12:47 AM
Like the title says folks.

I can't believe I made this thread.

David Atkins
10-07-2006, 12:53 AM
I never say no to pudding.

Not even when I should.

Spike-X
10-07-2006, 01:34 AM
Sure, why not?

Lester C.
10-07-2006, 05:32 AM
He going to intake but not swallow.

Weetomuncher
10-07-2006, 06:11 AM
I reckon that Clinton should be buried up to the neck in pudding and have some smeared on his face and then be left with 70 million African pudding ants.

That is what he deserves after eating a sandwich from another store in a Starbucks.

David Bedlam
10-07-2006, 07:17 AM
I think instead of dipping this guy into the pudding, we scoop it out into bowls and eat it.

Assuming that it's a yummy pudding.

Or flavored with beer.

Damo
10-07-2006, 10:17 AM
I reckon that Clinton should be buried up to the neck in pudding and have some smeared on his face and then be left with 70 million African pudding ants.

That is what he deserves after eating a sandwich from another store in a Starbucks.

I've done that. And I'll to it again too. Come and get me do-gooder!

Ninja Kris
10-07-2006, 10:41 AM
No. Batman should drop him in a vat of acid instead.

Kristin.

the4thpip
10-07-2006, 10:44 AM
No. Batman should drop him in a vat of acid instead.

Kristin.
Then who'll help the people with HIV?

Grazzt
10-07-2006, 10:48 AM
Then who'll help the people with HIV?

Uh, hello? Its Batman dropping him into a vat of acid, that means he's going to get superpowers from it. Or become hideously deformed and insane, but his luck and power of invention will be so godly that it might as well be a superpower.