PDA

View Full Version : Gene Colan: Secrets in the Shadows


MichikoS
06-09-2006, 09:09 PM
I just got this book (2005, TwoMorrows) from Amazon and read through it last night. It's quite good.

I was rather expecting a breathless fanboy hagiography.

Instead, it's thoughtful, balanced, and accurate in its portrayal of a remarkable and complex man and artist.

Author Tom Field provides an enthusiastically partisan, but extremely fair, in-depth discussion of Colan's contributions to graphic storytelling. The interview questions are probing rather than adversarial, and the whole undertaking has a respectful tone that still pulls no punches when it comes to exploring the more painful episodes in Colan's career, especially his split with Marvel after 15 years of superstardom there, his feud with Jim Shooter, and the less than stellar work he subsequently did for DC.

One surprise for me was Colan's rather brutal treatment at the hands of Dick Giordano. There are always two sides to a story, but Colan does seem to have been given the bum's rush at DC.

Ah, the magnificent art! Field and other contributors suggest that until you study Colan's original pencils, you can't truly appreciate the full glory of his work. I agree. Even Tom Palmer's consistently sympathetic inking doesn't do full justice to Colan's subtle chiaroscuro and liquid panel layouts. The hundreds of examples of Colan's pencil work in this book are a feast for the eyes. There are plenty of original commissions as well as published panels.

Colan makes no bones about his deep affection for Daredevil, and the book provides ample evidence of his incredible affinity for the character. Nobody can choreograph an acrobatic swing over the cityscape like Colan.

Colan discusses his habitual preference of NOT laying out a complete plot out in thumbnails or storyboards. In fact, he makes it quite clear that he doesn't like to read a story in its entirety before beginning to draw! This odd technique often results in a squished, nine-panel final page or an unsatisfying visual fizzle to what ought to be a big finish.

It's a bizarre quirk that's resulted in some unusually-paced stories, that's for sure. Colan defends this practice by pointing out that he is discovering the story in the same way the reader is. Interesting.

Colan is an original, whatever else you think of him or his art. His style is instantly identifiable, and his contribution to comics is inestimable.

I appreciated getting to know the man behind the art a little better in this book. I think it's one of the best comic artist bios out there. A+

Michi

david r
06-10-2006, 07:36 AM
I'd love to read this book.

Cei-U!
06-10-2006, 08:29 AM
This is one of the items on my shopping list for SDCC. Colan is my favorite comic book artist bar none. I have the Gene Colan Annual: Painting with a Pencil volume (autographed, even) already. I'm looking forward to adding this new one to my library.

Cei-U!
I summon the anticipation!

Greg Hatcher
06-10-2006, 08:41 AM
I got this at LAST year's SDCC, I think, and had a pleasant exchange with Mr. Colan. It really is a fun book. There's also interviews with writers that worked with Gene too.

scratchie
06-10-2006, 10:11 AM
I got this for Christmas. I haven't read through the whole thing but it seems like a very thorough biography, with lots of great art, as noted. I particularly like the mutual-admiration-society interview with Colan and Steve Gerber.

Lone Ranger
06-10-2006, 12:53 PM
Kat gave me the book for my birthday last October. I blogged about it, and Tom Field post a comment.

Great stuff overall!

http://seductionoftheindifferent.blogspot.com/2005/10/secrets-in-shadows-art-life-of-gene.html

Cherokee Jack
06-10-2006, 01:17 PM
Weren't there two versions of this book? I have a hardcover, but I thought there was a tpb also. It's a great book.

Red Oak Kid
06-10-2006, 01:24 PM
Thanks for the info on this book.

Gene Colan may be the single most original, one of a kind comic book artist in the history of ever.

When I first saw his art, I thought it was weird, but then I realized how original it was. I'd like to think of a better word than original, but I can't. His art is beyond original.

The fact that he got crossways with Shooter is not surprising. I've yet to read an interview with any Marvel artist who had anything good to say about Shooter.

But I am shocked to read anything negative about Giordano. Could anyone send me a private email and let me know Colan's beef with Giordano? I'd rather it be private, than posted here, since there are always two sides to every story.

I thought Colan's work on Detective Comics was awsome.

scratchie
06-10-2006, 06:20 PM
Weren't there two versions of this book? I have a hardcover, but I thought there was a tpb also. It's a great book.Yes, there are, and I believe the hardcover might have slightly more content.

scratchie
06-10-2006, 06:24 PM
When I first saw his art, I thought it was weird, but then I realized how original it was. I'd like to think of a better word than original, but I can't. His art is beyond original.When I was a kid, Gene Colan was just another one of those old guys who appeared in the "Origins" books. I saw his work in Howard the Duck, but that book was so different from everything else anyway that it didn't really strike me how unique the art was (also, I was much less tuned into the art as a kid).

Coming back to reread my 70s comics as an adult, I was really blown away by the creativity in Colan's work on HTD. One thing I love is that he draws every character with an identifiable, unique face (are you listening, John Byrne?). On the few issues where Val Mayerik filled in, for instance, Winda just didn't look like Winda.

More important, though, is his incredible visual style. He could draw a page with nothing but two people talking (or one person and a duck) (and there are a lot of pages like that in HTD!) and still maintain visual interest across the whole thing.

Agentum
06-11-2006, 12:32 AM
And Byrne said Colan drawed worthless crap and garbage or something like that.

nonhosonno
06-11-2006, 11:39 PM
Specifically, Byrne-out criticized Colan for (don't quote me) "lack of detail" consistent with his style — a HUGE crock of you-know-what (more like a coprolith). Byrne-out has absolutely no place criticizing Gene. He cannot render, embellish, draw action or establish mood and noir atmospheres as Gene can. Simply, Byrne-out's work doesn't hold a candle to GC's, and I expect no arguments when it comes to that observation!