PDA

View Full Version : All-Purpose Spider-Man 3



Pages : 1 2 [3]

kel25
11-09-2006, 09:56 PM
The first SM3T I saw gave me goosebumps and I probably watched it ten times in a row. For some reason this new one doesn't grab me any where near as much. Still, it's nice to get a little more.

GRANT!
11-09-2006, 10:41 PM
Oh, and the trailer is very cool. If you look really closely, there's a very brief shot of Venom swinging away with Mary Jane.

I saw some black webs but no shot of Venom swinging with Mary Jane. Where did you see that?

StoneGold
11-09-2006, 11:38 PM
AICN had a prototype shot for Venom up a couple of days ago, Sony made them take it down. Looked about as faithful to the original as the Spidey costume. Which is to say, minor differences in the textures.


Oh, and look at the belltower scenes. It doesn't look like the costume is just cloth in those.

Murrocko
11-09-2006, 11:38 PM
I saw some black webs but no shot of Venom swinging with Mary Jane. Where did you see that?
Yeah, what he said.


I liked it, but really wanted more. I can't wait for the release.

Sean Whitmore
11-09-2006, 11:42 PM
AICN had a prototype shot for Venom up a couple of days ago, Sony made them take it down. Looked about as faithful to the original as the Spidey costume. Which is to say, minor differences in the textures.

Screw AICN. CBR's got em now. (http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?t=151162) :D


SEAN

Gilda Dent
11-09-2006, 11:43 PM
I saw some black webs but no shot of Venom swinging with Mary Jane. Where did you see that?

Well, now it appears to be gone. I must have imagined it in the quick montage at the end.

GRANT!
11-09-2006, 11:48 PM
Well, now it appears to be gone. I must have imagined it in the quick montage at the end.

I would have imagined something cooler. Like four armed Spidey fighting Stegron.



Screw AICN. CBR's got em now.


SEAN

Surprised they didn't take those down yet.

StoneGold
11-09-2006, 11:52 PM
Surprised they didn't take those down yet.
A lot of message boards have them. It's hard to comb the boards for them all. Main pages of news sites, a little easier.

GRANT!
11-09-2006, 11:57 PM
A lot of message boards have them. It's hard to comb the boards for them all. Main pages of news sites, a little easier.

I know I just figure the mods might take it upon themselves. Not that I want them to.

Captain_Video
11-10-2006, 12:41 AM
Yeah I remember that issue when you find out that Sandman killed Uncle Ben, didnt the next part have Harry Osborn as "The Night Surfer" ?

Was it Web of Spider-Man or Spectacular Spider-Man ?

I can't remember.

I am sure this movie will be entertaining enough for its close to three hour duration.

fanboy d
11-10-2006, 01:19 AM
that trailer was GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEAT! not wild about harry's get up but the green goblin outfit(s) are pretty much the only questionable things about this franchise so i'll get over it, hell i think i have already. they really fixed up how the symbiote moves from the teaser.

venom will probably not be in it for long but i can wait patiently to see him in action...

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/3731/venomqy8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Sean Whitmore
11-10-2006, 01:23 AM
Yeah I remember that issue when you find out that Sandman killed Uncle Ben, didnt the next part have Harry Osborn as "The Night Surfer" ?

It was after the one where Peter was bitten by a genetically-altered spider, but before the one where Green Goblin knocked Mary Jane off the bridge.


SEAN

Mac Danny
11-10-2006, 05:13 AM
I had chills. It seems like this chapter will be very plot heavy. Parts of the trailer seemed to be too revealing, i.e. Harry in traction.

However, the mystery of where the suit comes from wasn't hinted at, so I appreciate that.

I can't wait.

I had thought since they introduced Captain Jameson that they would use the costume origin from the 90's cartoon.

He bought it back from Space with him.

The trailer was great. Nice to see Peter as a dick. Also Topher doesn't look like he's playing Brock to be as much of an A-Hole as he was.

Sandman is COOL!

Nintendite
11-10-2006, 06:38 AM
That was the best Movie Trailer I have seen in a looooooooong time. Some of the stuff they were saying in it makes me worried that this might be the last Spidey movie, though (I think I read that most of the actors will return only if Sam Raimi returns).

Phil Clark
11-10-2006, 07:02 AM
As far as the effects... remember this is still just a movie trailer. Many of the effects shots may still be just little better than slick animatics. A lot of refinement can occur between now and the release in May.

Captain Trips
11-10-2006, 07:15 AM
There were two. One of him saying "Love the new outfit" and one totally badass shot of Peter throwing him against a wall and breaking some glass. Now that's a reason for Eddie to hate Peter.

The glass that breaks is a frame for a blow up of the front page of the Bugle that has the headline "Spider-man Shows His True Colors," with a photo of Spidey in his black suit doing something (can't see what). I think Peter may be pissed that Eddie is helping the Bugle portray Spider-man as a bad guy.

Gary Joyce
11-10-2006, 10:26 AM
I think the whole Sandman killing Uncle Ben will the symbiote messing with Peters head in an attempt to completely bond with him.When peter realises Sandman is not the killer he will realise he has to lose the suit.

the film freak
11-10-2006, 03:23 PM
As far as the effects... remember this is still just a movie trailer. Many of the effects shots may still be just little better than slick animatics. A lot of refinement can occur between now and the release in May.

It looks better in HD. Especially with richer blacks.

Also I heard John Jameson is in the movie. So they might be doing that origin for the movie

hoffmandu
11-10-2006, 04:34 PM
Three, actually. He appears very early in the trailer when the crowds are cheering Spidey, right before we see Spidey standing next to the American Flag.

He seems to be a big Spidey 'shipper (like Flash was in the comics). I think Pete's probably throwing him around for trying to horn in on his Spidey photos. Pete probably feels he's got a corner on the market.

Gwen will probably die at hands of a villian, through some sort of negligenace from the symbiote wearing Parker. In fact, virtually retelling his origin.

Patient Boy
11-11-2006, 02:07 AM
Nobody's talking about the new trailer? Basically an extended version of the earlier, shorter one. No giveaways as to plot (which is good), a sneak at Gwen Stacey. Apparently the movie will try to link Sandman to Uncle Ben's murder, I don't see how and I'm not sure how fond I am of this particular detail (having seen it done in Batman and Daredevil already) but I'm giving Sam Raimi the benefit of the doubt here.

And a parade for Spider-Man.

the film freak
11-11-2006, 03:20 AM
Nobody's talking about the new trailer? Basically an extended version of the earlier, shorter one. No giveaways as to plot (which is good), a sneak at Gwen Stacey. Apparently the movie will try to link Sandman to Uncle Ben's murder, I don't see how and I'm not sure how fond I am of this particular detail (having seen it done in Batman and Daredevil already) but I'm giving Sam Raimi the benefit of the doubt here.

And a parade for Spider-Man.

Seperate thread. Scroll down below.

stealthwise
11-12-2006, 12:32 AM
The Sandman reveal will hopefully prove to be a hoax, otherwise you have a comic movie gaff larger than the Superbaby.

I'd like to see Mary Jane get tossed out of the movie like Cyclops ala X3 though, as she does nothing for me. Dunst delivers her horrendous lines with all the acting ability of a second-rate soap star, and she has no chemistry with Maguire.

DonC
11-12-2006, 08:44 AM
It's up at youtube if you're having trouble with ifilm. Probably won't be up long, though.

http://youtube.com/results?search_query=spider-man+3&search=Search

Captain Trips
11-12-2006, 10:43 AM
See it now before it gets taken down. An alternate version of the trailer with incomplete effects, new scenes, and Venom at the end. He looks awesome! Just like the comic.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30671?holy_smokes___a_pretrailer_in_progress_of_sp iderman_3_with_venom_footage

Nate Grey
11-12-2006, 12:16 PM
Thomas Haden Church revealed, quite a while ago, too, that he's the villain for a good quarter of the movie, but Venom is the villain for the whole final 30 minutes of the movie. At first I thought that was kinda reckless to reveal but then a) I can't even remember the name of the magazine I saw that in, I just remember it was in a Suncoast store, and b) no one else has seen it anyway so no one else knows this, so I guess its all good. lol REALLY looking forward to the movie now.

the film freak
11-12-2006, 12:49 PM
Thomas Haden Church revealed, quite a while ago, too, that he's the villain for a good quarter of the movie, but Venom is the villain for the whole final 30 minutes of the movie. At first I thought that was kinda reckless to reveal but then a) I can't even remember the name of the magazine I saw that in, I just remember it was in a Suncoast store, and b) no one else has seen it anyway so no one else knows this, so I guess its all good. lol REALLY looking forward to the movie now.

They were filming scenes here in New York where it was Venom and and Sandman fighting Spider-man. Basically Raimi when directing the crowd reactions said There's two bad guys holding a girl hostage and suddenly a giant monster (the Sandman monster we saw in the trailer) appears while the other bad guy gets away with the girl.

the film freak
11-12-2006, 12:55 PM
See it now before it gets taken down. An alternate version of the trailer with incomplete effects, new scenes, and Venom at the end. He looks awesome! Just like the comic.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30671?holy_smokes___a_pretrailer_in_progress_of_sp iderman_3_with_venom_footage

Dude you might want to change your Avatar since some people want to wait until the movie to see what Venom looks like.

Still really cool to see a early version of the trailer. I think I heard Raimi doing scratch track for one of Peters lines.

venom029
11-12-2006, 12:57 PM
See it now before it gets taken down. An alternate version of the trailer with incomplete effects, new scenes, and Venom at the end. He looks awesome! Just like the comic.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30671?holy_smokes___a_pretrailer_in_progress_of_sp iderman_3_with_venom_footage

Dude that was totally amazing

thanks for putting up the link

Jared
11-12-2006, 12:59 PM
Awesome. Anyway, (extremly mild spoilage ahead)

Venom appears to look like...Venom. Nothing shocking there.

Frankie Dennis
11-12-2006, 01:57 PM
Venom is looking pretty good so far.

Captain Trips
11-12-2006, 02:02 PM
Dude you might want to change your Avatar since some people want to wait until the movie to see what Venom looks like.

Still really cool to see a early version of the trailer. I think I heard Raimi doing scratch track for one of Peters lines.


Didn't think about that. Sorry. I hope I didn't ruin it for anyone.

Edit: Although, on the previous page of this thread is this:
http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/3731/venomqy8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

the film freak
11-12-2006, 02:24 PM
Didn't think about that. Sorry. I hope I didn't ruin it for anyone.

Edit: Although, on the previous page of this thread is this:

*picture of Venom




True but this is a speculation and anticipation thread. Anyone avoiding spoilers probably won't come here (or at least piss and moan that they've be spoiled). Your avatar on the other hand can be seen anywhere you posted.

Captain Trips
11-12-2006, 02:38 PM
True but this is a speculation and anticipation thread. Anyone avoiding spoilers probably won't come here (or at least piss and moan that they've be spoiled). Your avatar on the other hand can be seen anywhere you posted.

Good point. I removed it. I honestly didn't think about that. Again, sorry if I spoiled anything for anyone.

meethraa
11-12-2006, 03:00 PM
Dammit, I missed the Venom trailer.
Anyone knows of another place where I could find it?

Sean Whitmore
11-12-2006, 03:04 PM
Dammit, I missed the Venom trailer.
Anyone knows of another place where I could find it?

Here is the link AICN had:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5l9fEBs4m8

By all indications, it will be gone soon.

Here is just the Venom part:

http://www.tg3h.com/episodes/Venomclipsound.mov


SEAN

meethraa
11-12-2006, 03:07 PM
I dunno about the whole thing, but here is just the Venom part:

http://www.tg3h.com/episodes/Venomclipsound.mov


SEAN
Thanks my good man!
I shall watch it and complain about inaccuracies at once!

SlightlyMad
11-13-2006, 10:45 AM
Here's one (http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5866757396576992173&q=spider-man+3+venom) that hasn't been removed yet.

Guts/Batman
11-13-2006, 11:01 AM
Thank you Slightly Mad. I had not seen it.

metalhead_dave743
11-13-2006, 01:02 PM
I thought Spider-Man 2 was stellar until I read Alex Ross' take on it. I still like it, but he makes some sense, and I no longer think it's as great as I did.


Mind showing me a link to read that?

Jared
11-13-2006, 01:49 PM
Here's one (http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5866757396576992173&q=spider-man+3+venom) that hasn't been removed yet.

Here's another one, it actually has the more complete-effects from the official trailers.

http://gorillamask.net/spiderman3venom.shtml

SlightlyMad
11-13-2006, 02:15 PM
Anyone managed to get screen grabs yet?

This movie is gonna be the most awesome one yet.

p.s. Didn't Sam, or someone else involved in production say that Harry wouldn't be taking on a Goblin persona, so maybe he's Jack O'Lantern or Rocket Racer?

Sean Whitmore
11-13-2006, 02:21 PM
p.s. Didn't Sam, or someone else involved in production say that Harry wouldn't be taking on a Goblin persona, so maybe he's Jack O'Lantern or Rocket Racer?

I'd be very surprised if Harry took on any kind of name. I would imagine his entire thing is "put on the gear, kill Peter, and get on with my life."

For action figure purposes, he'll sell just as many being labeled "Harry as Goblin" or "Green Goblin II" or something. :)


SEAN

andy khouri
11-13-2006, 11:39 PM
An illegally leaked, unfinished trailer for "Spider-Man 3" has surfaced on the web featuring an unobscured, full-color look at Spidey's most dangerous foe, VENOM.

Warning: Possible Spoilers.

http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=8893

Jiminez Criqueta
11-14-2006, 12:13 AM
Looks pretty good, although that shot is blurry so hard to tell. I kinda wish they went with the current venom look and added smaller eyes into the white patches. Looks better. More....alive.

the goddamn batman
11-14-2006, 02:39 AM
mmm... I dunno. He looks ok I guess. Hard to tell.

I guess we know how he finds the suit now.

nickfury187
11-14-2006, 05:11 AM
At least it seems like they follow the comic pretty close the way Eddie gets the suit. Now, how does PETER get the suit? Hmmm...........:confused:

Drifter
11-14-2006, 06:09 AM
At least it seems like they follow the comic pretty close the way Eddie gets the suit. Now, how does PETER get the suit? Hmmm...........:confused:

SPOILER... Highlite below

A meteorite crashes in central park with the suit attached, Peter and MJ just happen to be strolling through the park at the tmie and the symbiott latches onto the bottom of Peters shoe.

adamthered
11-14-2006, 10:40 AM
SPOILERS IN LINK BELOW!


http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/showthread.php?t=115116

Follow the link, second post, there's a gif of the trailer. Better'n nothin' :D

TheCrow13
11-14-2006, 03:50 PM
Everywhere has taken it down :(

TheCrow13
11-14-2006, 03:50 PM
Everywhere has taken it down :(

lushe
11-28-2006, 07:45 AM
or just the simbiot

Gilda Dent
11-28-2006, 08:06 AM
Yes. Topher Grace plays Venom's host.

Stellar
11-28-2006, 08:07 AM
But you just know you're only going to see him in like the last 10 minutes of the movie, which will get us totally psyched for Spider-Man 4.

meethraa
11-28-2006, 08:12 AM
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5086/1131/1600/Venom.gif

Stellar
11-28-2006, 08:16 AM
Like i said, last ten minutes.

Agent Helix
11-28-2006, 08:23 AM
Venom's in the movie.

He's not a cliffhanger for the next movie.

Frankie Dennis
11-28-2006, 11:06 AM
But you just know you're only going to see him in like the last 10 minutes of the movie, which will get us totally psyched for Spider-Man 4.

I thought he was in the movie for 13 minutes.

borateen
11-28-2006, 11:11 AM
You'd think with more than 2,000 that lushe would know that there was a Movie forum for questions like this.

thespianphryne
11-28-2006, 12:18 PM
I thought he was in the movie for 13 minutes.

Yes, and Hannibal Lecter was in Silence of the Lambs for only 18 minutes and he still stole that movie.

It all depends on the script.

the film freak
11-28-2006, 06:36 PM
But you just know you're only going to see him in like the last 10 minutes of the movie, which will get us totally psyched for Spider-Man 4.

I should put this as my sig...

There's no deals signed for Spider-man 4 (aside from Alvin Sargent the screenwriter). All the Venom/symbiote stuff will be resolved in Spider-man 3. They've already shot scenes where Spider-man and Venom fight. You can see some shots in the trailer. Big hint: if there's black webbing all over the place it ain't Peters.

Robotech Master
11-28-2006, 10:16 PM
There's also a scene where Harry, in his goblin gear, is carrying Spider-man (unmasked IIRC) on his glider, holding him in a somewhat protective way (IE, likely at the end of the movie when Harry comes to terms with what happened with his father), and the two are flying off, looking behind them as if something is chasing them and they are desperate to get away. And since Sandman is supposed to be built up in a somewhat sympathic light in this movie, my guess is that the antagonist chasing them is Venom.

Besides guys, we already know from the recent trailer and the comic con trailer that Peter uses the bell tower to get rid of the Symbiote, it falls from the roof and lands on Eddie Brock--and if past movies are any indication, there will be a good chunck of the movie left from that point on in which Parker, in normal costume, will have to deal with the problems that he caused when he had the black suit on, this time righting his wrongs.

ChrisIII
01-13-2007, 05:03 AM
Here's Medicom's upcoming Venom action figure:


http://www.action-figure.co.uk/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=20936


As you can see, he's quite different from the concept art, although this is really only an action figure (Although from what I understand Medicom is pretty accurate).


EDIT: Oops, somebody beat me to it.

SlightlyMad
03-28-2007, 09:52 AM
Remember a while back when it was rumoured that Bruce Campbell was going to play "Quention Beck" (aka Mysterion)? Well, Bruce isn't currently among the cast & crew on the IMDB Spider-man 3 page & there is no mention of the movie on his own IMDB page.

I think that either he & Sam Raimi have fallen out (highly unlikely) or his involvement in Spider-Man 3 is being kept under wraps to surprise fans (much more likely).

The thing is, if it is the latter, I may have worked it out. Bruce Campbell is...

Kraven the Hunter!

I got the idea from seeing Hasbro's new Kraven figure (http://www.hasbro.com/marvel/spiderman/default.cfm?page=Products/Detail&product_id=19240) & remembering Bruce a Autolycus in Xena: Warrior Princess:

http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Contrib/Xena/images/autolycus.gif

Anyone else think I'm onto something?

Phil Clark
03-28-2007, 09:57 AM
While he would be awesome as Kraven, I don't see it happening in this film, simply because that would be just too much. Maybe the next one.

marshal99
03-28-2007, 10:00 AM
Don't recall any rumors about him having a major role in any spider-man movies , but he will play a small cameo role as per usual no doubt in part 3.

MaxofSteel
03-28-2007, 10:08 AM
I wouldn't mind if he's Beck or Kraven either way.

Hadn't considered Kraven though. Sounds like an interesting theory.

Captain_Video
03-28-2007, 10:36 AM
Don't recall any rumors about him having a major role in any spider-man movies , but he will play a small cameo role as per usual no doubt in part 3.

Bruce is playing a guy who teams up with Spidey to thwart a villain, sort of...he is certainly in Spidey 3 and he has not fallen out with Raimi in the slightest, not from anything I have read.

Though a lot of people have since Raimi went uber Hollywood.

Spider-man 3, should be a decent ending to a film trilogy but it will be quite an odd Spider-man story, should be well made none the less.

I still like the first one best though, it doesnt have the sheen of the second and it has a great romantic/naive quality to it.

GRANT!
03-28-2007, 10:47 AM
Though a lot of people have since Raimi went uber Hollywood.

Only person I recall saying bad things about him is Danny Elfman and he's got a rep of being a prima donna anyways.

Captain_Video
03-31-2007, 07:12 PM
Only person I recall saying bad things about him is Danny Elfman and he's got a rep of being a prima donna anyways.

There are others, but personal conflicts is not something I should have brought into a movie discussion, it is irrelevant and I was idiotic for bringing it up as it doesnt really matter who argues with who as long as the movie is good.

( I have been a huge Raimi fan for years and he is a different guy now, no longer the hilarious nihlist film-maker that produced his most interesting work, so being a shameless fanboy I take interest in how he has changed as a person, that does not make it relevant to discussion of this movie ).

DannyV_El_Acme
04-22-2007, 07:27 PM
IGN.COM just released their advance review of the movie, and they like what they saw. Click here (http://movies.ign.com/articles/782/782381p1.html) to check it out :)

Van Custo
04-22-2007, 07:32 PM
IGN.COM just released their advance review of the movie, and they like what they saw. Click here (http://movies.ign.com/articles/782/782381p1.html) to check it out :)

User reviews on imdb.com are real positive too from what I saw....

Wenatchee the Hatchet
04-22-2007, 10:07 PM
Well, it was Elfman who talked about how I hated working with Raimi on Spiderman 2 so since Elfman went so public about it and the studio got Chris Young instead I'd say it has some bearing on the film. Ironically the reason Elfman said he refused to work with Raimi anymore was because of the Spiderman 2 soundtrack and I thought the soundtrack for the second was a lot more interesting than the first. So for this movie-goer Elfman was complaining about decisions Raimi made that resulted in a better soundtrack. I'm wondering if Elfman should be left to his own devices as much he thinks he should.

roguespirit
04-27-2007, 05:28 PM
Ok spidey fans

My co-host on my podcast and I got into a press screening last week and we have 2 things for you if your interested.

We were going to review it the same day we saw it but we got slapped with an embargo which we are blaming on the Sony Ninja Department. So we did a special non spiderman 3 review episode where we say as much as we can without saying anything if you see what I mean. Thats episode 30 and on Monday episode 31 will have both a spoiler free review and a spoiler full review.

So if your up for it pop over to www.geeksyndicate.co.uk (http://www.geeksyndicate.co.uk) and download episode 30

ultramandingo
10-08-2007, 05:55 PM
SPIDER-MAN 3: HOW IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED

This short film is so on-the-nose about the "Spider-Man" franchise that you actually wish this had been how the movie ended... especially the bit after the credits...

http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=features&Id=2039

trickster
10-17-2007, 04:14 AM
My god, couldn't they find someone fatter to play Gwen Stacy in SM:3?
http://marvel.com/videos/Spider-Man_3_Red_Carpet

ozvette
10-17-2007, 04:25 AM
You do realise that she had a child less than 2 months before that right?

darkhawk76
10-17-2007, 05:03 AM
shhh nobody likes to talk about the 'Goblin twins' :p

trickster
10-17-2007, 05:45 AM
shhh nobody likes to talk about the 'Goblin twins' :p
LOL.

You do realise that she had a child less than 2 months before that right?
What, before the premiere? So she was pregnant during the movie? I thought she was supposed to portray a girl in her 20s. Not pregnant married housewife. Strange, for me.

darkhawk76
10-17-2007, 05:58 AM
it depends on when they filmed her scenes, it's not like Gwen was in it as much as MJ

anyway I thought Bryce looked fine in the movie

trickster
10-17-2007, 06:05 AM
Well, I haven't seen the movie. Just curious whether she looked like that in the movie.

Sean Whitmore
10-17-2007, 01:51 PM
Holy Jesus.

No, she wasn't.


SEAN

Toku King
10-17-2007, 01:58 PM
Leave Gwen Stacy alone! She's a human being!

Btw, this was during her pregnancy, so it's obvious that she'd look big.

Thorlief
10-17-2007, 02:01 PM
what's SM3?

oh yeah. That movie that pretended to be a Spiderman movie

Jared
10-17-2007, 02:03 PM
Holy Jesus.


I second that. She looked like more like Mama Cass than herself. That might be the biggest I've ever seen a woman get from being pregnant. I shudder to think at what she must have given birth to.

But she was fine in the movie. And pregnancy is a beautiful thing. In a non-literal way. :)

StoneGold
10-17-2007, 02:03 PM
Her in the movie.

http://media.movieweb.com/galleries/2399/2377/lo/spiderman3_images_08.jpg
http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Profiles/20061003/244.howard.ron.100206.jpg

ChrisIII
10-17-2007, 02:05 PM
I thought Howard did a pretty good job as Gwen. However, she wasn't terribly well developed (or her father, for that matter). Hopefully, the next film might deal with the whole "death of the Stacys" plotline, although since the first movie already used up the Goblin storyline and the bridge scene, and Doctor Octopus is dead, they're going to have to think of something else, unless they either (A) bring GG or Ock back-there is precedent for this in comic book films already, with Jean Grey and Elektra coming back, but let's not overuse the cliche, or (B) go the Ultimate comics route, which would make more sense.

Black Atom
10-17-2007, 02:13 PM
http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Profiles/20061003/244.howard.ron.100206.jpg

No wonder Spider-Man 3 sucked. Everyone knows Gwen's supposed to be blonde.

mattx110
10-17-2007, 02:18 PM
LOL.

What, before the premiere? So she was pregnant during the movie? I thought she was supposed to portray a girl in her 20s. Not pregnant married housewife. Strange, for me.

people in the their 20s get pregnant too.

and if they wanna adapt the whole sins past thing, they need someone that believably could have been the age of consent while norman was still alive.

Jared
10-17-2007, 02:19 PM
and if they wanna adapt the whole sins past thing,

Take that back. TAKE IT BACK!!! :evilangry

Sean Whitmore
10-17-2007, 02:19 PM
people in the their 20s get pregnant too.

and if they wanna adapt the whole sins past thing, they need someone that believably could have been the age of consent while norman was still alive.

Heck, I don't think comics Gwen was even that old when it happened.


SEAN

kalorama
10-17-2007, 02:22 PM
Heck, I don't think comics Gwen was even that old when it happened.

I believe the story took place during the gang's second year of college, which would put her in the 19-20 range (assuming she didn't skip any grades in public school).

Sean Whitmore
10-17-2007, 02:25 PM
I believe the story took place during the gang's second year of college, which would put her in the 19-20 range (assuming she didn't skip any grades in public school).

Ah, that's right.


SEAN

mattx110
10-17-2007, 02:30 PM
I believe the story took place during the gang's second year of college, which would put her in the 19-20 range (assuming she didn't skip any grades in public school).

i'm praying she was a dumb kid...

Shellhead
10-17-2007, 02:55 PM
My god, couldn't they find someone fatter to play Gwen Stacy in SM:3?
http://marvel.com/videos/Spider-Man_3_Red_Carpet

"Mary Jane" wasn't exactly as thin as a model in the Spider-man movies. If somebody ever films a live-action Muppet Show movie, they should totally cast Kirsten Dunst as Miss Piggy.

Thorlief
10-17-2007, 02:57 PM
http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Profiles/20061003/244.howard.ron.100206.jpg

http://tametheweb.com/personal/McCrane/Movies/emil1.jpg

Black Atom
10-17-2007, 03:25 PM
"Mary Jane" wasn't exactly as thin as a model in the Spider-man movies. If somebody ever films a live-action Muppet Show movie, they should totally cast Kirsten Dunst as Miss Piggy.

You're being sarcastic, right? Dunst looked damned near anorexic.

J. Robb
10-17-2007, 03:31 PM
So she was pregnant during the movie? I thought she was supposed to portray a girl in her 20s. Not pregnant married housewife. Strange, for me.
That's nothing, the guy playing Spider-Man has no spider-powers whatsoever!

Deep_Sleeper
10-17-2007, 03:39 PM
Yeah. Bryce Howard was definitely easy on the eyes in the movie. She was not the problem with SM3.

kalorama
10-17-2007, 03:40 PM
"Mary Jane" wasn't exactly as thin as a model in the Spider-man movies. If somebody ever films a live-action Muppet Show movie, they should totally cast Kirsten Dunst as Miss Piggy.

I can only assume you live on a planet populated entirely by Eastern European supermodels, because that's the only way anyone could think Dunst was fat.


That's nothing, the guy playing Spider-Man has no spider-powers whatsoever!

LIAR!

Shellhead
10-18-2007, 06:06 AM
Kirsten has a fat face and unusually saggy breasts for someone who is in her mid-20s. I'm guessing that she doesn't work out or eat right, but just relies on bulimia or anorexia to get in shape for her movies, then pigs out the rest of the time. She is attractive, just not particularly healthy looking. Yes, I'm judging her by Hollywood standards, because she chose to be an actress, so she should be judged by those standards.

http://www.starwrecked.faketrix.com/contents/celebs/large-pics/kirsten-dunst.jpg

http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/kirsten-dunst-44th-annual-new-york-film-festival-marie-antoinette-press-conference-xByTyf.jpg

trickster
10-18-2007, 06:09 AM
Smoke and mirrors, that's what American entertainment is all about. Some of these guys look so ugly in real life it's scary.


Kirsten has a fat face and unusually saggy breasts for someone who is in her mid-20s. I'm guessing that she doesn't work out or eat right, but just relies on bulimia or anorexia to get in shape for her movies, then pigs out the rest of the time. She is attractive, just not particularly healthy looking. Yes, I'm judging her by Hollywood standards, because she chose to be an actress, so she should be judged by those standards.
I don't know if working out is gonna help in the case of sagging tits, nor an appropriate diet. It's not like she's gonna get the body of Kim Kardashian or Jessica Alba.
(What makes a good diet anyway? Tom Cruise is rumored to be a vegetarian and he seems in very good shape).

Jared
10-18-2007, 10:20 AM
Tom Cruise is rumored to be a vegetarian and he seems in very good shape).

And you could be too, if you harness your mental energy to purge your body of unclean Thetans. Hubbard Be Praised.

Black Atom
10-18-2007, 10:29 AM
Kirsten has a fat face and unusually saggy breasts for someone who is in her mid-20s. I'm guessing that she doesn't work out or eat right, but just relies on bulimia or anorexia to get in shape for her movies, then pigs out the rest of the time. She is attractive, just not particularly healthy looking. Yes, I'm judging her by Hollywood standards, because she chose to be an actress, so she should be judged by those standards.


Could just be bad genes. She has that Fred Savage curse and is turning into a rather odd-looking adult. Dunst has always been rail thin. Her head is getting bigger but her body isn't. A tan wouldn't kill her, either.

But she's a long way from overweight, even by Hollywood standards.

trickster
10-18-2007, 12:14 PM
And you could be too, if you harness your mental energy to purge your body of unclean Thetans. Hubbard Be Praised.
Dude, I meant physically. Mentally. that's a whole other ball game. Besides, crazy or not, he sure bagged himself a nice one. And maybe if I managed to harness my mental energy I'd be where he is.

kalorama
10-18-2007, 01:32 PM
Besides, crazy or not, he sure bagged himself a nice one.

Well, that's whathigh-priced lawyers and lengthy contractual negotiations will get you.

trickster
10-18-2007, 10:55 PM
Well, that's whathigh-priced lawyers and lengthy contractual negotiations will get you.
What, his lawyers held Katie Holmes at gunpoint and said "You marry him or we'll kill you?"

Jared
10-19-2007, 04:52 PM
Dude, I meant physically. Mentally. that's a whole other ball game. Besides, crazy or not, he sure bagged himself a nice one. And maybe if I managed to harness my mental energy I'd be where he is.

I meant physically too. A master of Scientology like Cruise is said to be able to manipulate reality itself. I'm sure getting ripped abs abs is a simple matter of concentration, at that point.