PatrickG
05-10-2006, 01:38 PM
I was reading a review of the Northern Exposure DVD boxed set and I noticed, apparently, that music had to be substituted to keep the DVD cost down.
Now, I never noticed this with my Buffy boxed sets but I found this bit from the Northern Exposure review interesting and informative:
Before saying a couple of things about the seasons, let me say that people who complain about the soundtrack really need to . . . I apologize beforehand for any impoliteness here . . . shut up!!! Look, music substitution is just going to be part of the future from here on out in TV shows coming out on DVD. There is simply no way around it. Or rather, if you want to blame someone, blame ASCAP and BMI and RIAA. Here is the real deal: as long as these folks continue to exact such huge royalties for the use of songs, we are going to get vastly less expensive songs substituted for the original ones. There is simply no way around it. The makers of the DVDs have two choices: substitute music and sell the sets at reasonable prices or use the original music and sell the sets at absurdly high prices. Want to pay $100 per season of NORTHERN EXPOSURE? Well, neither do I. But to get the original music that is what it is going to cost. So, the choice really is substituting music or paying through the nose for our DVDs. This is the very reason why ALLY McBEAL may never some out on DVD. That show was written too tightly to particular songs to enable substitution. Right now they are unable to come up with pricing that makes it possible to bring it out on DVD. Someday? Maybe. But until such nonproductive entities as I mentioned above (especially RIAA), who own rights but really don't do anything for anyone that matters, especially the artists, start bringing the fees charged down to a reasonable level, substitution is going to be the standard practice.
So... If I understand this correctly, TV shows can stay in reruns forever (using songs from the original broadcast) without being terribly butchered up, even as they face dwindling profits. But throw in the prospect of DVD sales and the RIAA wants the seasons to sell for double what the market will support in the name of "artists"?
Seriously, anyone in favor of intellectual property law as it stands (or arguing for further extensions) is a BASTARD in my opinion. It's not for the sake of art.
It ceases to be about the sake of art or artists when you're talking about reaping profits after everyone who created a work of art is DEAD. And that's exactly what people at Disney, Scientology, the RIAA and politicians like Mary Bono are talking about.
They aren't in favor of protecting artists. They're in favor of something no less heinous in my eyes than necrophelia.
Of course, the RIAA will stroll out some poor artist's grandkid as a posterchild for why copyright should be forever. When, in fact, the real issue is that CORPORATIONS want copyright to be forever. And that grandkid or great-grandkid should not be ENTITLED to exclusive control over his grandfather's creativity; it belongs to ALL of us at a certain point and, eventually, that grandkid or great-grandkid should be encouraged to get off her/his ass and create some new intellectual property rather than milking the family inheritance.
I'm no fan of hacking or piracy. I don't use peer to peer networking except mytunes and I pay for my downloads there. The only "illegal" downloads I've ever made were off easy to find webpages which, in almost every case, the artist was aware of. If a band has an official myspace site and puts their music for download without the permission of their record label, I don't feel bad. If a movie director has a site with downloads of songs used in their films, I don't feel guilty. But I AM disgusted with people hoarding hundreds of episodes of hundreds of TV shows on their computer. I am disgusted at the thought of someone having thousands upon thousands of illegally downloaded CDs.
But I'm more sick of the RIAA and the corporate intellectual property gestapo which is trying to KILL the public domain.
Does anyone know of a way to get involved in this issue? I'm afraid that most people are scared to speak up or find it difficult to be passionate about an issue like this. But I think it's time to ACT. It's time for me, at least, to write to elected officials and let them know that the death of the public domain is a make or break issue for me in elections and that there are thousands more like me.
This has been an issue where corporate money has controlled political policy for over 25 years and it's TIME to send a message to people in Washington that politicians who base their policy on who finances their campaign can rot in Hell.
Now, I never noticed this with my Buffy boxed sets but I found this bit from the Northern Exposure review interesting and informative:
Before saying a couple of things about the seasons, let me say that people who complain about the soundtrack really need to . . . I apologize beforehand for any impoliteness here . . . shut up!!! Look, music substitution is just going to be part of the future from here on out in TV shows coming out on DVD. There is simply no way around it. Or rather, if you want to blame someone, blame ASCAP and BMI and RIAA. Here is the real deal: as long as these folks continue to exact such huge royalties for the use of songs, we are going to get vastly less expensive songs substituted for the original ones. There is simply no way around it. The makers of the DVDs have two choices: substitute music and sell the sets at reasonable prices or use the original music and sell the sets at absurdly high prices. Want to pay $100 per season of NORTHERN EXPOSURE? Well, neither do I. But to get the original music that is what it is going to cost. So, the choice really is substituting music or paying through the nose for our DVDs. This is the very reason why ALLY McBEAL may never some out on DVD. That show was written too tightly to particular songs to enable substitution. Right now they are unable to come up with pricing that makes it possible to bring it out on DVD. Someday? Maybe. But until such nonproductive entities as I mentioned above (especially RIAA), who own rights but really don't do anything for anyone that matters, especially the artists, start bringing the fees charged down to a reasonable level, substitution is going to be the standard practice.
So... If I understand this correctly, TV shows can stay in reruns forever (using songs from the original broadcast) without being terribly butchered up, even as they face dwindling profits. But throw in the prospect of DVD sales and the RIAA wants the seasons to sell for double what the market will support in the name of "artists"?
Seriously, anyone in favor of intellectual property law as it stands (or arguing for further extensions) is a BASTARD in my opinion. It's not for the sake of art.
It ceases to be about the sake of art or artists when you're talking about reaping profits after everyone who created a work of art is DEAD. And that's exactly what people at Disney, Scientology, the RIAA and politicians like Mary Bono are talking about.
They aren't in favor of protecting artists. They're in favor of something no less heinous in my eyes than necrophelia.
Of course, the RIAA will stroll out some poor artist's grandkid as a posterchild for why copyright should be forever. When, in fact, the real issue is that CORPORATIONS want copyright to be forever. And that grandkid or great-grandkid should not be ENTITLED to exclusive control over his grandfather's creativity; it belongs to ALL of us at a certain point and, eventually, that grandkid or great-grandkid should be encouraged to get off her/his ass and create some new intellectual property rather than milking the family inheritance.
I'm no fan of hacking or piracy. I don't use peer to peer networking except mytunes and I pay for my downloads there. The only "illegal" downloads I've ever made were off easy to find webpages which, in almost every case, the artist was aware of. If a band has an official myspace site and puts their music for download without the permission of their record label, I don't feel bad. If a movie director has a site with downloads of songs used in their films, I don't feel guilty. But I AM disgusted with people hoarding hundreds of episodes of hundreds of TV shows on their computer. I am disgusted at the thought of someone having thousands upon thousands of illegally downloaded CDs.
But I'm more sick of the RIAA and the corporate intellectual property gestapo which is trying to KILL the public domain.
Does anyone know of a way to get involved in this issue? I'm afraid that most people are scared to speak up or find it difficult to be passionate about an issue like this. But I think it's time to ACT. It's time for me, at least, to write to elected officials and let them know that the death of the public domain is a make or break issue for me in elections and that there are thousands more like me.
This has been an issue where corporate money has controlled political policy for over 25 years and it's TIME to send a message to people in Washington that politicians who base their policy on who finances their campaign can rot in Hell.